Literature DB >> 34457736

Shaping Perceptions of Basic Science Education by Utilizing Real Patient Encounters.

Emine Ercikan Abali1,2, Hanin Rashid1, H Liesel Copeland1, Melissa Calt1, Richard DeMaio1, Jashvin Patel1, Sam Schild1, Sangita Phadtare3, Louis Chai1, Michael Ullo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Integrating basic science into clinical teaching has been a struggle for medical schools. However, early exposure to clinical experience has been associated with an increased understanding of the importance of basic science, positive attitudes, and developing clinical skills faster. Furthermore, early clinical exposure can help students reconnect with what drove them into medicine in the first place, especially when they are starting to feel burned out by the volume of lecture material. As a result, increasing patient experience during the first year has become a goal of many medical schools.
METHODS: At Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, interprofessional case discussions (ICDs) begin with a lecture that explicitly integrates basic science with a disease, followed by a discussion with a patient, their family, the healthcare team, and first-year students. Our objective is to explore whether ICDs enhanced the learning experience of basic science. CONTEXT: ICD satisfaction was assessed using evaluations from two different courses (2013-2016). Responses were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics and qualitatively using a grounded-theory-content analysis. Study 2: A follow-up measure with current third- and fourth-year students on long-term retention of basic science was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Relative rankings of three different case-based teaching modalities were assessed using chi-square.
RESULTS: Students reported significantly higher satisfaction with ICDs (93%) for reinforcing concepts and integrating materials compared to Flipped Classrooms (66%) and Jigsaws (65%), x 2 = 120.9, p < .001. Student comments fit into five categories: enjoyment, learning/retention, the clinical usefulness of basic science, affirming passion to be in medicine, and others. The follow-up measure indicated significantly greater retention of the biochemical basis of diseases covered during ICDs.
CONCLUSIONS: While other teaching modalities integrate basic science into a clinical context, ICDs go further by displaying interprofessional care and the manifestation of the disease on the patient and the lives of their family. As a result, ICDs lead to a positive learning environment in which students feel comfortable, have a sense of rapport with the patients and health care providers, and feel motivated to learn basic science. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basic science; Integration; Interprofessional; Motivation; Real patient; Retention; Teaching modality; Undergraduate medical education; Value

Year:  2020        PMID: 34457736      PMCID: PMC8368671          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-00951-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  34 in total

1.  The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: creating coherence among signs and symptoms.

Authors:  Nicole N Woods; Lee R Brooks; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 2.  Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends.

Authors:  Geoffrey Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Selective use of the primary literature transforms the classroom into a virtual laboratory.

Authors:  Sally G Hoskins; Leslie M Stevens; Ross H Nehm
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Learning in interprofessional teams: AMEE Guide no 38.

Authors:  Marilyn Hammick; Lorna Olckers; Charles Campion-Smith
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 5.  The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23.

Authors:  Jill Elizabeth Thistlethwaite; David Davies; Samilia Ekeocha; Jane M Kidd; Colin MacDougall; Paul Matthews; Judith Purkis; Diane Clay
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 6.  Cognition before curriculum: rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning.

Authors:  Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram; Maria Athina Martimianakis; Maria Mylopoulos; Cynthia R Whitehead; Nicole N Woods
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 7.  Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies.

Authors:  Jeroen J G van Merriënboer; John Sweller
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction.

Authors:  Maria Mylopoulos; Nicole Woods
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  How we flipped the medical classroom.

Authors:  Neel Sharma; C S Lau; Iain Doherty; Darren Harbutt
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.650

10.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Case-Based Collaborative Learning via Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Edward Krupat; Jeremy B Richards; Amy M Sullivan; Thomas J Fleenor; Richard M Schwartzstein
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.