Literature DB >> 34457606

Student Perceptions Regarding Group Learning Activities in a Hybrid Medical Curriculum.

Mona Hmoud AlSheikh1, Muhammad Zafar Iqbal1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Problem- and team-based learning strategies have been introduced in the revised integrated curriculum of our medical college. This study aims to assess perceptions of students regarding recently introduced group learning activities into our hybrid curriculum.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study has used a pre-validated questionnaire to find out the perceptions of medical students studying at College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU). The response of students on the questionnaire was recorded by using a 5-point Likert scale. The data was analyzed by using one-way ANOVA. Mean and standard deviation were calculated. Additionally, three open-ended questions were asked to assess the merits and demerits of these newly implemented group learning approaches.
RESULTS: Out of 736 students, 190 (25.81%) completed the questionnaire. Among the 190 respondents, 64 were from second year, 65 were from third, and 61 were from fourth. Overall, the results show a positive response of students and that they favor the introduction of group learning instructional design in the hybrid curriculum. Students perceived group learning to be helpful in developing their critical thinking, socialization, motivation, and communication skills.
CONCLUSION: This study concludes that group learning activities introduced in a hybrid curriculum have remained successful in promoting group dynamics and overall satisfaction of students toward group learning. However, some issues have been reported too. The views of the students recorded in this study might be helpful in evaluating the implemented hybrid curricula and in optimizing the group environment and function. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Group dynamics; Group functioning; Group learning; Hybrid curriculum; Problem-based learning; Team-based learning

Year:  2019        PMID: 34457606      PMCID: PMC8368608          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00817-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  8 in total

1.  Effective small group learning: AMEE Guide No. 48.

Authors:  Sarah Edmunds; George Brown
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Problem-based learning (PBL): getting the most out of your students - their roles and responsibilities: AMEE Guide No. 84.

Authors:  Emily Bate; Juliette Hommes; Robbert Duvivier; David C M Taylor
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  The PBL group: self-reflections and feedback for improved learning and growth.

Authors:  A Holen
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Small group learning: Graduate health students' views of challenges and benefits.

Authors:  Debra Jackson; Louise D Hickman; Tamara Power; Rebecca Disler; Ingrid Potgieter; Hiba Deek; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  Contemp Nurse       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.787

5.  Can less be more? Comparison of an 8-item placement quality measure with the 50-item Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM).

Authors:  Martina Kelly; Deirdre Bennett; Arno Muijtjens; Siun O'Flynn; Tim Dornan
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  [An assessment of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) in Chilean university students].

Authors:  Javiera Ortega B; Cristhian Pérez V; Liliana Ortiz M; Eduardo Fasce H; Peter McColl C; Graciela Torres A; Ana Wright; Carolina Márquez U; Paula Parra P
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.553

7.  Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds!

Authors:  Diana Dolmans; Larry Michaelsen; Jeroen van Merriënboer; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  The DREEM, part 1: measurement of the educational environment in an osteopathy teaching program.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan; Annie Carter; Chris Macfarlane; Tracy Morrison
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.