Literature DB >> 34457569

Development of an Instrument for Preceptor Evaluation of Medical Graduates' Performance: the Psychometric Properties.

Mia Kusmiati1, Noor Aini Abdul Hamid2, Suhaila Sanip3, Ova Emilia4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A preceptor has a key role in evaluating medical graduate's performance in the clinical setting. This study is conducted to develop an instrument for preceptor evaluation of medical graduates' performance in the clinical setting.
METHOD: A mixed-method study design, sequential exploratory approach was chosen to develop the instrument. Initial semi-structured interviews were conducted with 4 preceptors at the teaching hospitals. Five main themes emerged from the interviews. The themes were developed into a 23-item questionnaire. Nineteen Head or Assistant Head of clinical departments were asked to review the relevance of the content. The questionnaire was later sent out to 34 preceptors and 35 paramedic staffs to participate in the construct validity study by conducting exploratory factor analysis (EFA). SPSS version 21 software was used to analyze the data and Varimax rotation method was performed to simplify and describe the data structure. RESULT: Review of the factor structures suggested that the most appropriate fit was 5 factors. Most of the questionnaire items were relevant to assess performance (4.65 + 0.15), except in item 4 of the clinical skill factor. The 23 items of the evaluation instruments showed that five factors were extracted which explained 73.9% of the variance between them. Construct validity was achieved after the instrument was run for an iteration of eight times, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.951. DISCUSSION: The instrument has achieved the desired content and construct validity score. It can be used by other institutions to assess their medical graduates' performance in the clinical setting. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Construct validity; Content validity; EFA; Preceptor

Year:  2019        PMID: 34457569      PMCID: PMC8368111          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00774-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  11 in total

1.  Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center.

Authors:  H L Copeland; M G Hewson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Deirdre C Lynch; Patricia M Surdyk; Arnold R Eiser
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Using evaluation research to improve medical education.

Authors:  Mohsen Tavakol; Larry D Gruppen; Sima Torabi
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2010-09

4.  Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes.

Authors:  Cees P M van der Vleuten; Lambert W T Schuwirth
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Evaluation of curricula in higher education: challenges for evaluators.

Authors:  Christiane Spiel; Barbara Schober; Ralph Reimann
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2006-08

6.  The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: involving stakeholders to determine content validity.

Authors:  Renée E Stalmeijer; Diana H J M Dolmans; Ineke H A P Wolfhagen; Arno M M Muijtjens; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews.

Authors:  Pierre Pluye; Quan Nha Hong
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Psychometric properties of the mentor role instrument when used in an academic medicine setting.

Authors:  Terri Collin Dilmore; Doris McGartland Rubio; Elan Cohen; Deborah Seltzer; Galen E Switzer; Cindy Bryce; Brian Primack; Michael J Fine; Wishwa N Kapoor
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 10.  Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Anthoine; Leïla Moret; Antoine Regnault; Véronique Sébille; Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.