| Literature DB >> 34456868 |
Zhongkang Li1, Mingle Zhang1, Jiahua Zheng1, Yanpeng Tian1, Huihui Zhang2, Yi Tan2,3, Qian Li1, Jingkun Zhang1, Xianghua Huang1.
Abstract
Background: Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is associated with severe physical damage and psychological burden on women. Transplantation of exosomes is an encouraging regenerative medicine method, which has the potential for restoring ovarian functions on POI with high efficiency. This study aims at evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (hUCMSC-Exos) on ovarian dysfunction of POI and the role of Hippo pathway in this exosome-mediated treatment.Entities:
Keywords: exosome; hippo signaling pathway; mesenchymal stem cell; premature ovarian insufficiency; proliferation; reproduction
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34456868 PMCID: PMC8397419 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.711902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1Characterization and identification of hUCMSCs and hUCMSC-Exos. (A) The morphology of hUCMSCs at the fourth passage and the tenth passage. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) hUCMSCs were positive for CD73, CD105, CD44, and CD90, and were negative for CD34, CD45, and HLA-DR, as shown by flow cytometry analysis. (C) Alizarin Red staining was used for hUCMSCs osteogenic identification, and Oil Red O staining was conducted for adipogenic differentiation. Scale bar: 200 μm. (D) Representative images of hUCMSC-Exos under transmission electron microscopy. Scale bar: 100 nm. (E) Particle size distribution of hUCMSC-Exos was determined by Flow Nano Analyzer. (F) hUCMSC-Exos were positive for CD9, CD81, and CD63, which were shown by flow cytometry analysis.
Results of identification of hUCMSCs, hUCMSC-Exos and GCs, and establishment of POI model.
| Identification | Methods | Results | Figure |
|---|---|---|---|
| hUCMSC | (1) Morphological Analysis | Cells exhibited a consistent spindle-shape from passage 4 to 10 |
|
| (2) Flow cytometry | CD73, CD105, CD44, and CD90 are positive, and CD34, CD45, and HLA-DR are negative |
| |
| (3) Osteogenic/adipogenic differentiation | Calcium deposition and neutral lipid vacuole accumulation |
| |
| Exosomes | (1) Transmission electron microscopy | Exosomes exhibited a cup-shaped morphology |
|
| (2) Flow NanoAnalyzer | Size distributions ranging from approximately 50 to 100 nm at a concentration of 8.69×1010 particles/mL |
| |
| (3) Flow cytometry | CD9, CD81, and CD63 are positive |
| |
| Granulosa cells | (1) Morphological Analysis | Oval or polygonal shapes with a single layer |
|
| (2) Immunofluorescence staining | Most cells possessed FSHR |
| |
| Establishment of POI model | (1) Body weights | Body weights loss in the POI group | |
| (2) Vaginal smear | Stayed in the estrous phase or lost the periodic change in the POI model | ||
| (3) Morphological analysis | Follicle numbers were declined, the arrangement of GCs was disordered, and interstitial fibrosis was severe in the POI group |
| |
| (4) TUNEL analysis | More TUNEL-positive cells were observed in the POI group |
|
Figure 2Morphology and identification of GCs and therapeutic effects of hUCMSC-Exos in CTX-damaged GCs. (A) Morphologies of mouse ovarian GCs after isolation at 48 h and 72 h. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) Identification of GCs by FSHR immunofluorescence. Scale bar: 100 μm. (C) EdU assay showed hUCMSC-Exos promoted the proliferative of GCs; cell nuclei were stained blue, while cells with proliferation activity were stained red. Scale bar: 50 μm. (D) Proliferation ratio of GCs was analyzed through the EdU assay. (E) Effects of hUCMSC-Exos on GCs viability were assessed by the CCK-8 assay from day 0 to day 5. (F) Representative immunoblots of PCNA and FSHR, using GAPDH as the reference. Quantification of protein expression revealed that exosomal treatment increased the expression levels of (G) PCNA and (H) FSHR. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns, no significance. Data are representative of three independent experiments in each group.
Figure 3Therapeutic effects of hUCMSC-Exos in POI mice models. (A) Experimental timeline. After POI models were established by the injection of CTX twice, hUCMSC-Exos transplantation was performed. Seven days after the last treatment, six mice were sacrificed while six other mice were mated with male mice (1:1). (B) H&E staining of ovaries in the Normal and POI group. Scale bar: 100 μm and 200 μm. (C) Apoptosis was measured by TUNEL staining in the Normal and POI group. Cell nuclei were stained by DAPI (blue fluorescence) while apoptotic cells were stained with FITC (green fluorescence). Scale bar: 100 μm. (D) HE staining of ovaries in three different groups. Scale bar: 50 μm and 200 μm. (E) The number of follicles in different stages in each group. (F) Mice weight changes in the three groups. The dotted line indicates mice received treatment for 14 days and 21 days. (G) AMH, (H) E2, and (I) FSH levels were significantly elevated in the Exo group compared to the POI group and were near normal levels. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns, no significance. Data are representative of three independent experiments in each group.
Figure 4Exosomes improved reproductive functions of POI mice. (A) Representative outcomes of reproduction in the three groups. (B) Pregnancy rate at 4 weeks after treatment. (C) Cumulative pregnancy rate at 8 weeks after treatment. (D) The number of offspring in the three groups. (E) Time to birth after treatment. Data are presented as percentage or mean ± SD; n = 6 per group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, no significance.
Figure 5Exosomes restored the expression levels of FSHR in GCs in vivo. (A) Expression levels of FSHR in ovaries as measured by immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Expression levels of FSHR in ovaries as measured by immunohistochemical staining. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Figure 6Exosomes promoted ovarian proliferation by regulating the Hippo pathway in POI mice. (A) Expression of PCNA was measured by immunofluorescence staining in the different groups. Scale bar: 50 μm and 200 μm. Expression of Ki67 was measured by (B) immunohistochemical staining and (C) immunofluorescence staining in the three groups. Scale bar: 20 μm and 50 μm. (D) Representative immunoblots of biomarkers of proliferation and the Hippo pathway, using GAPDH as reference. Quantification of protein expression revealed that exosomal treatment elevated the expression levels of (E) FSHR, (F) PCNA, (G) YAP1, (I) TEAD1, and (J) TAZ, and suppressed the expression of (H) p-YAP and (K) MST1. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns, no significance. Data are representative of three independent experiments in each group.
Figure 7Exosomes promoted GCs proliferation by regulating the Hippo pathway in vitro. (A) The EdU assay showed that hUCMSC-Exos promoted GCs proliferation, while the inhibitor of YAP, verteporfin, reversed this effect. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Proliferative ratio of GCs in five different groups was analyzed through the EdU assay. (C) Cell proliferation curve of GCs from day 0 to day 5 in the five groups, as measured by the CCK-8 assay. (D) Representative immunoblots of biomarkers of proliferation and the Hippo pathway in the five groups, using GAPDH as reference. Quantification of protein expression levels of (E) FSHR, (F) PCNA, (G) YAP1, (I) TEAD1, (J) TAZ, (H) p-YAP, and (K) MST1 revealed that exosomes promoted GCs proliferation by regulating the Hippo pathway, and the therapeutic effects were suppressed by verteporfin. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns, no significance. Data are representative of three independent experiments in each group.
Figure 8Model for how hUCMSC-Exos increase ovarian cells proliferation by regulating the Hippo pathway. In brief, after phagocytosis by ovarian cells, exosomes regulated key molecules of the Hippo through the non-coding RNA and other molecules that they convey to cells, thereby regulating the Hippo pathway and promoting cell proliferation.
Results of hUCMSC-Exos treatment.
| Methods | Results | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Exosomal treatment | (1) Vaginal smear | Estrous cycle was gradually restored to normal after treatment | |
| (2) Morphological analysis | Follicles were significantly increased in the Exos group ( | ||
| (3) Ovarian follicle counts | Numbers of primordial, primary, secondary, mature, and atretic follicles were significantly increased following exosomal transplantation ( | Primordial: POI | |
| (4) Body weights | Body weights in the Exos group exhibited a gradual increase ( | ||
| (5) Hormones levels in serum | AMH and E2 were significantly elevated, while FSH levels were suppressed after exosomal administration ( | AMH: POI | |
| (6) Reproductive tests | Exosomes significantly improved reproductive functions of POI mice model ( | Number of offspring: POI | |
| (7) FSHR expression in ovaries | I Immunofluorescence and Immunohistochemistry staining of FSHR revealed that more functional GCs were observed in the Exos group ( | ||
| (8) Proliferative ability | Immunofluorescence staining of PCNA and Ki67, Immunohistochemistry staining of Ki67 showed hUCMSC-Exos promoted ovarian proliferation ( | ||
| (9) Mechanism exploration | hUCMSC-Exos promoted ovarian proliferation by regulating the Hippo pathway ( | FSHR: POI | |
| Exosomal treatment | (1) EdU assay | Proliferation of GCs was significantly increased in the Exos group ( | Cell proliferation ratio: CTX |
| (2) CCK-8 assay | Proliferation of GCs was significantly enhanced in the Exos group ( | ||
| (3) Western blot | PCNA and FSHR were elevated in the Exos group ( | PCNA: CTX | |
| Therapeutic Mechanism | (1) EdU assay | hUCMSC-Exos promoted GC proliferation | Cell proliferation ratio: CTX |
| (2) CCK-8 assay | hUCMSC-Exos promoted GC proliferation and the effect was inhibited by a YAP inhibitor ( | ||
| (3) Western blot | hUCMSC-Exos elevated GCs proliferation and function by regulating the Hippo pathway ( | FSHR: CTX |