Literature DB >> 34456547

Handgrip Strength Cutoff Points for Functional Independence and Wheelchair Ability in Men With Spinal Cord Injury.

Frederico Ribeiro Neto1, Rodrigo R Gomes Costa1, Jefferson R Dorneles1, Carlos W Gonçalves1, João H C L Veloso2, Rodrigo L Carregaro3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine optimal handgrip strength (HGS) cutoff points for greater functional independence and wheelchair skills in men with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to establish predictive equations for functional independence and wheelchair ability in men with SCI, based on demographic characteristics, HGS, and functionality.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study conducted at a rehabilitation hospital, 54 men with SCI were recruited and stratified into high and low paraplegia groups. All participants performed a maximum HGS test to determine cutoff points for the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III) and Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit (AMWC). The primary outcomes were the SCIM-III, AMWC, and HGS. Demographic characteristics obtained from participants' electronic medical records were the secondary outcomes, used as predictor variables of functional independence.
RESULTS: The SCIM-III scale, performance score, and 3-minute overground wheeling test presented significant regression equations (R = 0.45, R = 0.69, and R = 0.72). The HGS showed a cutoff point of 102.5 kilogram force (kgf) to achieve a score of 70 on the SCIM-III and a 3-minute overground wheeling distance of 270 m. The HGS cutoff point to obtain a performance score of 23.7 seconds was 93.0 kgf.
CONCLUSION: The HGS was a significant predictor for the SCIM-III score, AMWC performance score, and 3-minute overground wheeling test. Three significant predictive equations were established based on HGS. The cutoff points could be adopted as parameters for optimal functional independence and wheelchair skills.
© 2021 American Spinal Injury Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  muscle strength dynamometer; reference values; rehabilitation; resistance training; test-taking skills

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34456547      PMCID: PMC8370706          DOI: 10.46292/sci20-00040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil        ISSN: 1082-0744


  62 in total

1.  Proactive balance strategy while maintaining a stationary wheelie.

Authors:  J P Bonaparte; R L Kirby; D A Macleod
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Muscle function assessment in children.

Authors:  G Stratton
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  Spasticity after traumatic spinal cord injury: nature, severity, and location.

Authors:  C Sköld; R Levi; A Seiger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Functional independence and health-related functional status following spinal cord injury: a prospective study of the association with physical capacity.

Authors:  Janneke A Haisma; Marcel W Post; Lucas H van der Woude; Henk J Stam; Michael P Bergen; Tebbe A Sluis; Hendrika J van den Berg-Emons; Johannes B Bussmann
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Wrist strength measured by myometry as an indicator of functional independence.

Authors:  M A Marciello; G J Herbison; J F Ditunno; R J Marino; M E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohort.

Authors:  Anne B Newman; Varant Kupelian; Marjolein Visser; Eleanor M Simonsick; Bret H Goodpaster; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Frances A Tylavsky; Susan M Rubin; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  The physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities: development and evaluation.

Authors:  Richard A Washburn; Weimo Zhu; Edward McAuley; Michael Frogley; Stephen F Figoni
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Grip strength reference values for Canadians aged 6 to 79: Canadian Health Measures Survey, 2007 to 2013.

Authors:  Suzy L Wong
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.796

9.  Compensatory strategies during manual wheelchair propulsion in response to weakness in individual muscle groups: A simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Jill L McNitt-Gray; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Cross-sectional age differences in body composition in persons 60+ years of age.

Authors:  R N Baumgartner; P M Stauber; D McHugh; K M Koehler; P J Garry
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.053

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.