Hajime Ichikawa1,2, Masahisa Onoguchi2, Takayuki Shibutani2, Toyohiro Kato2, Toshimune Ito3, Hideki Shimada1. 1. Department of Radiology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Aichi. 2. Department of Quantum Medical Technology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa. 3. Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is known to improve diagnostic performance. Although SPECT-alone systems are used widely, accurate quantitative SPECT using these systems is challenging. This study aimed to improve the accuracy of quantitative bone SPECT of the lumbar spine with the SPECT-alone system. METHODS: The cross-calibration factor (CCF) was measured using three kinds of phantoms and the optimal values were determined. The recovery coefficient with and without attenuation and scatter correction (ACSC) were compared. Bone SPECT/CT was performed on 93 consecutive patients with prostate cancer, and the standardized uptake values (SUVs) were compared using the respective CCFs. The first 60 patients were classified according to body weight, and the correlation coefficient between SUVs with and without ACSC were calculated; the slopes were defined as body weight-based coefficients (BWCs). In the remaining 33 patients, the SUV was adjusted according to BWC, and the accuracy of the adjustment was verified. RESULTS: The quantitative SPECT values obtained from the CCF using SIM2 bone phantom showed nearly accurate radioactivity concentrations, even without ACSC. The recovery coefficients with and without ACSC were similar. Unadjusted SUVs with and without ACSC were strongly correlated; however, SUVs without ACSC were significantly higher than those with ACSC (P < 0.0001). The mean difference between the SUVs with and without ACSC disappeared when the SUVs without ACSC were adjusted by BWC (P = 0.9814). CONCLUSIONS: Our cross-calibration method for quantitative bone SPECT enables interpretation with a harmonized SUV even in SPECT-alone systems.
OBJECTIVES: Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is known to improve diagnostic performance. Although SPECT-alone systems are used widely, accurate quantitative SPECT using these systems is challenging. This study aimed to improve the accuracy of quantitative bone SPECT of the lumbar spine with the SPECT-alone system. METHODS: The cross-calibration factor (CCF) was measured using three kinds of phantoms and the optimal values were determined. The recovery coefficient with and without attenuation and scatter correction (ACSC) were compared. Bone SPECT/CT was performed on 93 consecutive patients with prostate cancer, and the standardized uptake values (SUVs) were compared using the respective CCFs. The first 60 patients were classified according to body weight, and the correlation coefficient between SUVs with and without ACSC were calculated; the slopes were defined as body weight-based coefficients (BWCs). In the remaining 33 patients, the SUV was adjusted according to BWC, and the accuracy of the adjustment was verified. RESULTS: The quantitative SPECT values obtained from the CCF using SIM2 bone phantom showed nearly accurate radioactivity concentrations, even without ACSC. The recovery coefficients with and without ACSC were similar. Unadjusted SUVs with and without ACSC were strongly correlated; however, SUVs without ACSC were significantly higher than those with ACSC (P < 0.0001). The mean difference between the SUVs with and without ACSC disappeared when the SUVs without ACSC were adjusted by BWC (P = 0.9814). CONCLUSIONS: Our cross-calibration method for quantitative bone SPECT enables interpretation with a harmonized SUV even in SPECT-alone systems.