Literature DB >> 34456312

Delayed Surgery Does Not Reduce Transfusion Rates in Low-Energy Hip Fractures on Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Ashley E Levack1, Harold G Moore1, Stephen Stephan2, Sally Jo3, Ian Schroeder2, John Garlich2, Aidan Hadad1, Milton T M Little2, Anna N Miller3, Stephen Lyman4, Joseph Lane1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare transfusion rates in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with nonanticoagulated patients undergoing hip fracture surgery and, secondarily, to determine whether time to surgery or complications differ between these groups.
DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort.
SETTING: Three tertiary care, academic, Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Acute, operatively treated, low-energy hip fracture patients 55 years of age and older were included. Anticoagulated patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio to "control" nonanticoagulated hip fracture patients using propensity score matching. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was incidence of perioperative transfusion. The secondary outcomes included time to surgery, length of stay, and 90-day complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients with hip fracture admitted on DOACs were identified (107 factor Xa inhibitors, 25 dabigatran) and were matched to 262 "control" nonanticoagulated patients. There was no difference in overall transfusion rates between anticoagulation and control groups (43.2%; n = 57 DOAC vs. 39.7%; n = 104 control; P = 0.517). The median time from admission to surgery was 41.7 hours in the DOAC group and 26.0 hours in the control group (P < 0.001). There were no differences in 90-day complication, readmission, reoperation, or mortality rates between DOAC and control groups. Comparing DOAC patients undergoing surgery within 24 hours and after 24 hours, there were no differences in transfusion rates (P = 0.558) or overall complication rates (P = 0.179).
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports growing evidence that DOAC use should not be a determining factor in delaying surgery for patients with hip fracture who are otherwise medically optimized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34456312      PMCID: PMC8866529          DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  29 in total

1.  Outcome of older hip fracture patients on anticoagulation: a comparison of vitamin K-antagonists and Factor Xa inhibitors.

Authors:  M Gosch; M Jacobs; H Bail; S Grueninger; S Wicklein
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Safety of urgent hip fracture surgery protocol under influence of direct oral anticoagulation medications.

Authors:  Haggai Schermann; Ron Gurel; Aviram Gold; Eran Maman; Oleg Dolkart; Ely L Steinberg; Ofir Chechik
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Management of hip fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Karl C Roberts; W Timothy Brox; David S Jevsevar; Kaitlyn Sevarino
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Managing hip fracture and lower limb surgery in the emergency setting: Potential role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  William Fisher
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Surgical Delay Is Not Warranted for Patients With Hip Fractures Receiving Non-Warfarin Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Ariana Lott; Jack Haglin; Rebekah Belayneh; Sanjit R Konda; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre.

Authors:  Barry Mullins; Harold Akehurst; David Slattery; Tim Chesser
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) cause delayed surgery, longer length of hospital stay, and poorer outcome for hip fracture patients?

Authors:  Sunniva Leer-Salvesen; Eva Dybvik; Anette H Ranhoff; Bjørn Liljestrand Husebø; Ola E Dahl; Lars B Engesæter; Jan-Erik Gjertsen
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 8.  Discontinuation and management of direct-acting anticoagulants for emergency procedures.

Authors:  Jerrold H Levy
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Use of Anticoagulants Remains a Significant Threat to Timely Hip Fracture Surgery.

Authors:  Razvan Taranu; Chelsea Redclift; Patrick Williams; Marina Diament; Anne Tate; Jamie Maddox; Faye Wilson; Will Eardley
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-22

10.  Rivaroxaban plasma levels in patients admitted for bleeding events: insights from a prospective study.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Sennesael; Anne-Sophie Larock; Jonathan Douxfils; Laure Elens; Gabriel Stillemans; Martin Wiesen; Max Taubert; Jean-Michel Dogné; Anne Spinewine; François Mullier
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2018-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.