Jeffrey Nau1, David J Wyatt2, Hans Rollema3, Christopher S Crean4. 1. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey. Electronic address: jnau@oysterpointrx.com. 2. Syneos Health, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina. 3. Rollema Biomedical Consulting, Mystic, Connecticut. 4. Xyzagen, Inc., Pittsboro, Connecticut.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To estimate the systemic bioavailability of OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray, an investigational treatment for dry eye disease, relative to oral varenicline approved for smoking cessation. METHODS: The Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability of Varenicline Administered as OC-01 (Varenicline) Nasal Spray as Compared to Varenicline Administered Orally as Chantix (ZEN study) was a Phase I, open-label, randomized, single-center, 2-way crossover study. On day 1, 22 healthy participants were randomized 1:1 to a single intranasal dose of varenicline 0.12 mg in OC-01 nasal spray or a single oral dose of varenicline 1 mg. On day 15, all participants crossed over to receive a single dose of the alternate treatment. Plasma samples were collected for 6 days after each dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis. Tolerability was monitored throughout. FINDINGS: After a single dose of intranasal varenicline 0.12 mg in OC-01 nasal spray, peak systemic exposure (mean plasma Cmax) was 0.34 ng/mL, which occurred at a median Tmax of 2.0 hours. In comparison, mean plasma Cmax after oral varenicline 1 mg was 4.63 ng/mL at a median Tmax of 3.0 hours. On the basis of geometric mean ratio point estimates, peak exposure (Cmax) and total exposure (AUC0-∞) after intranasal varenicline 0.12 mg were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively, of the systemic exposure associated with oral varenicline 1 mg. Dose-normalized Cmax and AUC0-∞ for intranasal varenicline remained 39% and 33% lower versus oral varenicline, respectively. No new or unexpected tolerability signals were detected. IMPLICATIONS: At its highest intended single dose in OC-01 nasal spray, intranasal varenicline delivered less drug to the systemic circulation than oral varenicline at its highest approved single dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04072146.
PURPOSE: To estimate the systemic bioavailability of OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray, an investigational treatment for dry eye disease, relative to oral varenicline approved for smoking cessation. METHODS: The Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability of Varenicline Administered as OC-01 (Varenicline) Nasal Spray as Compared to Varenicline Administered Orally as Chantix (ZEN study) was a Phase I, open-label, randomized, single-center, 2-way crossover study. On day 1, 22 healthy participants were randomized 1:1 to a single intranasal dose of varenicline 0.12 mg in OC-01 nasal spray or a single oral dose of varenicline 1 mg. On day 15, all participants crossed over to receive a single dose of the alternate treatment. Plasma samples were collected for 6 days after each dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis. Tolerability was monitored throughout. FINDINGS: After a single dose of intranasal varenicline 0.12 mg in OC-01 nasal spray, peak systemic exposure (mean plasma Cmax) was 0.34 ng/mL, which occurred at a median Tmax of 2.0 hours. In comparison, mean plasma Cmax after oral varenicline 1 mg was 4.63 ng/mL at a median Tmax of 3.0 hours. On the basis of geometric mean ratio point estimates, peak exposure (Cmax) and total exposure (AUC0-∞) after intranasal varenicline 0.12 mg were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively, of the systemic exposure associated with oral varenicline 1 mg. Dose-normalized Cmax and AUC0-∞ for intranasal varenicline remained 39% and 33% lower versus oral varenicline, respectively. No new or unexpected tolerability signals were detected. IMPLICATIONS: At its highest intended single dose in OC-01 nasal spray, intranasal varenicline delivered less drug to the systemic circulation than oral varenicline at its highest approved single dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04072146.