Literature DB >> 3445485

Perspective vergence: oculomotor responses to line drawings.

J T Enright1.   

Abstract

When a perspective drawing is viewed monocularly, changes in fixation point are accompanied by changes in steady-state vergence; their direction is usually appropriate for the distance relationships implied in the illustration. The absolute magnitude of these responses varies appreciably among subjects; it can be consistently enhanced or reduced by modest changes in the drawing. Similar configurations of stimuli from three-dimensional objects would presumably also contribute to normal vergence movements during binocular viewing; it appears that their importance would increase with target distance. Corresponding changes in pupil diameter, as expected for the "near reflex", were not observed with perspective stimuli. Consistent, directionally appropriate vergence changes, paralleling perception, were also made by most subjects during monocular viewing of a Necker cube, but there, exceptionally large pupillary responses arose.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3445485     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90160-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Perception can influence the vergence responses associated with open-loop gaze shifts in 3D.

Authors:  Boris M Sheliga; Frederick A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Human vergence eye movements to oblique disparity stimuli: evidence for an anisotropy favoring horizontal disparities.

Authors:  H A Rambold; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Convergence during human vertical saccades: probable causes and perceptual consequences.

Authors:  J T Enright
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The contribution of stereopsis in Emmert's law.

Authors:  Amy Siobhan Millard; Irene Sperandio; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Binocular eye movements evoked by self-induced motion parallax.

Authors:  Jared Frey; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sensitivity of vergence responses of 5- to 10-week-old human infants.

Authors:  Eric S Seemiller; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Where do the eyes really go in the hollow-face illusion?

Authors:  Marc Grosjean; Gerhard Rinkenauer; Stephanie Jainta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.

Authors:  D A Wismeijer; R van Ee; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.