| Literature DB >> 34454459 |
Yang Xiao1, Jingjing Mao1, Xiaodong Mao1, Qifeng Wang1, Xingjia Li1, Guofang Chen1, Ling Guo2, Huaying Huang2, Yiming Mu3, Shuhang Xu4, Chao Liu5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its component and thyroid volume in Chinese adolescents, and to compare the detection rate of MetS under the three different diagnostic criteria.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Metabolic syndrome; Thyroid volume
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34454459 PMCID: PMC8399830 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-021-00833-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 2.763
Basic characteristics of 1097 adolescents (mean ± SD)
| gender | male | female | total |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | 610(55.6 %) | 487(44.4 %) | 1097 |
| age (year) | 13.03 ± 1.05 | 13.08 ± 0.90 | 13.05 ± 0.98 |
| systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 117.44 ± 13.13** | 112.47 ± 11.68 | 115.23 ± 12.74 |
| diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 70.63 ± 8.34** | 72.86 ± 8.12 | 71.62 ± 8.31 |
| heart rate (/min) | 87.83 ± 11.93** | 90.43 ± 12.53 | 88.98 ± 12.26 |
| height (cm) | 166.15 ± 9.70** | 160.16 ± 8.31 | 163.50 ± 9.58 |
| weight (Kg) | 56.00 ± 13.37** | 51.93 ± 10.92 | 54.20 ± 12.51 |
| waist circumference (cm) | 68.39 ± 10.18** | 63.92 ± 6.82 | 66.41 ± 9.12 |
| hip circumference (cm) | 86.13 ± 8.74* | 84.88 ± 7.70 | 85.58 ± 8.31 |
| fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 4.99 ± 0.39** | 4.88 ± 0.35 | 4.94 ± 0.38 |
| total Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.00 ± 0.77** | 4.29 ± 0.76 | 4.13 ± 0.78 |
| triglyceride (mmol/L) | 0.86 ± 0.48** | 0.95 ± 0.44 | 0.90 ± 0.47 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.54 ± 0.30** | 1.64 ± 0.32 | 1.58 ± 0.31 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.01 ± 0.61** | 2.14 ± 0.62 | 2.07 ± 0.62 |
| uric acid (umol/L) | 411.91 ± 90.33** | 340.47 ± 74.50 | 380.31 ± 90.88 |
| fasting insulin (µIU/ml) | 12.20 ± 7.47 | 12.97 ± 5.41 | 12.5 ± 4.64 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.74 ± 1.80** | 2.83 ± 1.23 | 2.78 ± 1.58 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 20.32 ± 6.99 | 20.52 ± 7.79 | 20.41 ± 7.35 |
| thyroid volume (mL) | 5.40 ± 2.01** | 5.82 ± 2.04 | 5.59 ± 2.03 |
HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, BMI body mass index
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Comparison of thyroid volume between normal, overweight and obese subjects of different genders (mean ± SD)
| All | Male | Female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | thyroid volume(mL) | n | thyroid volume(mL) | n | thyroid volume(mL) | |
| normal ( | 459 | 5.39 ± 1.76 | 459 | 5.16 ± 1.66 | 398 | 5.66 ± 1.84 |
| overweight ( | 98 | 5.92 ± 1.79** | 98 | 5.87 ± 1.91** | 54 | 6.02 ± 1.58 |
| obesity ( | 53 | 6.89 ± 3.73** | 53 | 6.60 ± 3.74** | 35 | 7.33 ± 3.71** |
VS. normal, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Association between the number of MetS components and thyroid volume
| number of MetS components | n | thyroid volume(ml)(mean ± SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0a | 692 | 5.41 ± 1.61 | 10.64 | < 0.01 |
| 1b | 302 | 5.67 ± 2.16 | ||
| 2c | 70 | 6.24 ± 3.27 | ||
| 3and mored | 33 | 7.09 ± 3.81 |
Multiple LSD-t test: a VS. b, P = 0.60; a VS. c, P = 0.001; a VS. d, P < 0.001; b VS. C, P = 0.033; b VS. d, P < 0.001; c VS. d, P = 0.043
Fig. 1Linear Regression between physical and biochemical parameters and thyroid volume
Association between physical and biochemical parameters and thyroid volume
| Parameters | β | 95 %CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lower | upper | |||
| age | 0.607 | 0.406 | 0.808 | < 0.01 |
| gender | 0.200 | 0.107 | 0.294 | < 0.01 |
| DBP | 0.000 | -0.011 | 0.012 | 0.974 |
| Heart rate | -0.007 | -0.014 | 0.000 | 0.057 |
| WC | 0.029 | 0.015 | 0.042 | < 0.01 |
| FBG | 0.101 | -0.149 | 0.350 | 0.428 |
| TG | 0.096 | -0.119 | 0.311 | 0.382 |
| HDL-C | -0.073 | -0.376 | 0.230 | 0.637 |
| LDL-C | -0.077 | -0.223 | 0.069 | 0.298 |
| UA | 0.000 | -0.001 | 0.001 | 0.839 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.029 | -0.043 | 0.100 | 0.430 |
| WHtR | 3.317 | 1.661 | 4.973 | < 0.01 |
DBP diastolic blood pressure, WC waist circumference, FBG fasting blood glucose, TG triglyceride, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, UA uric acid, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, WHtR waist-to-height ratio
Comparison among groups in central obesity combined with other components
| Number of MetS components | N | Thyroid volume (ml) (mean ± SD) | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normala | 691 | 5.41 ± 1.61 | 2.51 | 0.057 |
| Central obesity | 37 | 5.59 ± 1.53 | ||
| Central obesity + hypertensionb | 28 | 5.96 ± 1.60 | ||
| Central obesity + dyslipidemia | 14 | 6.04 ± 1.53 |
Multiple LSD-t test: a VS. b, P = 0.038
Prevalences of MetS and its component under three criteria [n(%)]
| Chinese criterion | IDF criterion | Cook criterion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obesity | 111(10.1 %) | 111(10.1 %) | 111(10.1 %) |
| Hypertension | 113(10.3 %)a | 189(17.2 %) | 197(18.0 %) |
| Low HDL-C | 21(1.9 %) | 27(2.5 %) | 27(2.5 %) |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 121(11.0 %)b | 73(6.7 %)c | 190(17.3 %)d |
| Hyperglycemia | 35(3.2 %) | 67(3.2 %) | 35(3.2 %) |
| Metabolic syndrome | 33(2.3 %) | 31(2.8 %) | 33(3.0 %) |
Chinese criterion VS. IDF criterion, Cook criterion, aP < 0.01; Comparison among 3 criterion, b,c,dP < 0.01