Literature DB >> 34454115

Optimization of Sources of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Variability for Downstream Molecular Analysis.

Jacob E Till1, Taylor A Black1, Caren Gentile2, Aseel Abdalla1, Zhuoyang Wang1, Hareena K Sangha1, Jacquelyn J Roth2, Robyn Sussman2, Stephanie S Yee1, Mark H O'Hara1, Jeffrey C Thompson3, Charu Aggarwal1, Wei-Ting Hwang4, Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson2, Erica L Carpenter5.   

Abstract

Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is used increasingly as a cancer biomarker for prognostication, as a correlate for tumor volume, or as input for downstream molecular analysis. Determining optimal blood processing and ccfDNA quantification are crucial for ccfDNA to serve as an accurate biomarker as it moves into the clinical realm. Whole blood was collected from 50 subjects, processed to plasma, and used immediately or frozen at -80°C. Plasma ccfDNA was extracted and concentration was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), fluorimetry, and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). For the 24 plasma samples from metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, the variant allele fractions (VAF) of KRAS G12/13 pathogenic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were measured by ddPCR. Using a high-speed (16,000 × g) or slower-speed (4100 × g) second centrifugation step showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A two- versus three-spin centrifugation protocol also showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A higher yield was observed from fresh versus frozen plasma by qPCR and fluorimetry, whereas a higher yield was observed for frozen versus fresh plasma by ddPCR, however, no difference was observed in ctDNA VAF. Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when implementing a ccfDNA extraction and quantification workflow in a research or clinical setting.
Copyright © 2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34454115      PMCID: PMC8647427          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.341


  29 in total

1.  A note on concordance correlation coefficient.

Authors:  J J Liao; J W Lewis
Journal:  PDA J Pharm Sci Technol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

2.  Effects of preanalytical factors on the molecular size of cell-free DNA in blood.

Authors:  K C Allen Chan; Sze-Wan Yeung; Wing-Bong Lui; Timothy H Rainer; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  Circulating cell free DNA: Preanalytical considerations.

Authors:  Safia El Messaoudi; Fanny Rolet; Florent Mouliere; Alain R Thierry
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.786

4.  Performance comparison of blood collection tubes as liquid biopsy storage system for minimizing cfDNA contamination from genomic DNA.

Authors:  Yunlong Zhao; Yingjie Li; Ping Chen; Shaojun Li; Jian Luo; Hui Xia
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  The Effect of Preservative and Temperature on the Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA.

Authors:  Sonya Parpart-Li; Bjarne Bartlett; Maria Popoli; Vilmos Adleff; Laura Tucker; Rebecca Steinberg; Andrew Georgiadis; Jill Phallen; Julie Brahmer; Nilo Azad; Ilene Browner; Daniel Laheru; Victor E Velculescu; Mark Sausen; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  A Multianalyte Panel Consisting of Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs and mRNAs, cfDNA, and CA19-9 Shows Utility for Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zijian Yang; Michael J LaRiviere; Jina Ko; Jacob E Till; Theresa Christensen; Stephanie S Yee; Taylor A Black; Kyle Tien; Andrew Lin; Hanfei Shen; Neha Bhagwat; Daniel Herman; Andrew Adallah; Mark H O'Hara; Charles M Vollmer; Bryson W Katona; Ben Z Stanger; David Issadore; Erica L Carpenter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Preanalytical Variables for the Genomic Assessment of the Cellular and Acellular Fractions of the Liquid Biopsy in a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Stephanie N Shishido; Lisa Welter; Mariam Rodriguez-Lee; Anand Kolatkar; Liya Xu; Carmen Ruiz; Anna S Gerdtsson; Sara Restrepo-Vassalli; Anders Carlsson; Joe Larsen; Emily J Greenspan; E Shelley Hwang; Kathryn R Waitman; Jorge Nieva; Kelly Bethel; James Hicks; Peter Kuhn
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification.

Authors:  Alison S Devonshire; Alexandra S Whale; Alice Gutteridge; Gerwyn Jones; Simon Cowen; Carole A Foy; Jim F Huggett
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Investigation of Preanalytical Variables Impacting Pathogen Cell-Free DNA in Blood and Urine.

Authors:  Kanagavel Murugesan; Catherine A Hogan; Zaida Palmer; Byron Reeve; Grant Theron; Alfred Andama; Akos Somoskovi; Amy Steadman; Damian Madan; Jason Andrews; Julio Croda; Malaya K Sahoo; Adithya Cattamanchi; Benjamin A Pinsky; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Anne Tranberg Madsen; Johanne Andersen Hojbjerg; Boe Sandahl Sorensen; Anne Winther-Larsen
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.143

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The utility of cfDNA in TGCT patient management: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jure Krasic; Lucija Skara; Ana Katusic Bojanac; Monika Ulamec; Davor Jezek; Tomislav Kulis; Nino Sincic
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.485

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.