| Literature DB >> 34454115 |
Jacob E Till1, Taylor A Black1, Caren Gentile2, Aseel Abdalla1, Zhuoyang Wang1, Hareena K Sangha1, Jacquelyn J Roth2, Robyn Sussman2, Stephanie S Yee1, Mark H O'Hara1, Jeffrey C Thompson3, Charu Aggarwal1, Wei-Ting Hwang4, Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson2, Erica L Carpenter5.
Abstract
Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is used increasingly as a cancer biomarker for prognostication, as a correlate for tumor volume, or as input for downstream molecular analysis. Determining optimal blood processing and ccfDNA quantification are crucial for ccfDNA to serve as an accurate biomarker as it moves into the clinical realm. Whole blood was collected from 50 subjects, processed to plasma, and used immediately or frozen at -80°C. Plasma ccfDNA was extracted and concentration was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), fluorimetry, and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). For the 24 plasma samples from metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, the variant allele fractions (VAF) of KRAS G12/13 pathogenic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were measured by ddPCR. Using a high-speed (16,000 × g) or slower-speed (4100 × g) second centrifugation step showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A two- versus three-spin centrifugation protocol also showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A higher yield was observed from fresh versus frozen plasma by qPCR and fluorimetry, whereas a higher yield was observed for frozen versus fresh plasma by ddPCR, however, no difference was observed in ctDNA VAF. Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when implementing a ccfDNA extraction and quantification workflow in a research or clinical setting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34454115 PMCID: PMC8647427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Diagn ISSN: 1525-1578 Impact factor: 5.341