| Literature DB >> 34453644 |
Sneha Verma1, Ved Chaturvedi2, N K Ganguly1, Shivani Arora Mittal3.
Abstract
Vitamin D is an immunomodulatory hormone with an established role in calcium and phosphate metabolism and skeletal mineralization. Evidence showing its immunological benefits by regulating essential components of the innate and adaptive immune system is prevalent. Vitamin D deficiency is reported worldwide and is thereby found to be associated with various immune-related diseases. Rheumatoid Arthritis and COVID-19 are two such diseases, sharing a similar hyperinflammatory response. Various studies have found an association of lower Vitamin D levels to be associated with both these diseases. However, contrasting data is also reported. We review here the available scientific data on risk factor association and supplementation benefits of Vitamin D in Rheumatoid Arthritis and COVID-19, intending to critically evaluate the literature.Entities:
Keywords: Association; COVID-19; Deficiency; Rheumatoid arthritis; Supplementation; Vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34453644 PMCID: PMC8401347 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-021-04245-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cell Biochem ISSN: 0300-8177 Impact factor: 3.842
Fig. 1Immunomodulatory Effects of Vitamin D. The figure describes some of the gene targets of vitamin D and its effect on innate as well as adaptive immune system. Cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP), Integrin alpha M (ITGAM), CD93, Nuclear Factor NF-Kappa-B (NFKB1A), Receptor Activator of Kappa-B Ligand (RANKL), Cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2)
Vitamin D related clinical trial studies for Rheumatoid Arthritis
| Study AIM | Country | Sample Size (N) | Main Findings | Limitations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D-RA association studies | |||||
| Association between Vit. D levels and disease activity, disability and radiographic progression in early RA patients | France | 645 (treatment-naïve, early RA patients) | • Vit. D deficiency (< 10 ng/ml) correlated with more active and severe disease | • Heterogenous population | [ |
| • Small percentage of patients had vit. D supplementation at baseline | |||||
| • Deficiency may predict radiographic progression over 1 year | |||||
| Correlation of Vit. D levels and inflammatory cytokines and ROS in RA | India | 100 RA patients 50 controls | • Reduced Vit. D levels in RA patients | • Correlation between vitamin D and ROS or many pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines not observed | [ |
| • Negative correlation between inflammatory cytokines and vit. D levels and positive association with ROS levels | |||||
| Assessment of Vit. D status in RA patients & development of a new Patient Reported Outcome (D-PRO) questionnaire | European countries | 625 patients | • 64% of the sample (not supplemented) showed reduced Vit. D level | • Cross-sectional Study Design and lack of interventional data | [ |
| • Negative correlation between vitamin D levels and DAS28-CRP | |||||
| • No prior statistical testing of single items in the questionnaire | |||||
| • A first D-PRO questionnaire was validated | |||||
| • Heterogeneous food intake among a diverse population | |||||
| • Negative association between Vit. D levels and D-PRO global risk score was found | |||||
| Association of Vit. D status with disease activity in RA patients: “COMORA study” | Across 15 countries | 1413 RA patients | • Low Vit. D levels are prevalent in different countries & under different latitudes | • High variability in Vit. D levels in different countries | [ |
| • High variability in precision and accuracy of Vit. D assays in different countries | |||||
| • Low levels associated with RA (disease activity & corticosteroid dosage) & co-morbidities | |||||
| Cross-sectional study to investigate relationship between severity of pain and Vit. D levels in RA patients | Finland | 77 RA patients | • Negative correlation found between Vit.D levels and Visual Analog Score (VAS) | • Small sample size | [ |
| • Vit.D déficient patients are more prone to muskulosketal pain | |||||
| Vitamin D supplementation studies | |||||
| Parallel, double-blind randomized trial on effect of Vit.D on clinical features and experimental parameters in early RA patients | Italy | 18 (VitD3) 18 (Placebo) | • Vit. D supplementation (300,000 IU single dose; evaluated after 3 months) along with standard treatment improved global health in eRA patients | • Only females included | [ |
| • Limited sample size | |||||
| • Inclusion of patients regardless of their baseline Vit. D levels | |||||
| • No significant effect on RA symptoms measured as DAS28, CRP and VAS scores | |||||
| Effect of Vit D supplementation for pain relief in early RA, treatment-naïve (duration < 2 years) RA patients | India | 75 patients Two arms (along with DMARD therapy) Group A: Combination VitD3 (60,000 IU/week) + Calcium (1000 mg/day) Group B: Calcium (1000 mg/day) | • After 8 weeks, Vit. D supplementation resulted in 50% higher pain relief and DAS-28 scores but not on the time required for the onset of pain relief (Tm) | • Limited sample size | [ |
| • Lack of placebo control | |||||
| • No Double Blinding | |||||
| • Vit. D deficiency is a risk factor for developing active RA | |||||
| Retrospective study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Vit.D supplementation in RA patients | China | 1180 patients: VitD & Control Group | • No significant change in primary efficacy & secondary efficacy outcomes was observed | • Retrospective study | [ |
| • Heterogeneity in the study population in terms of disease duration, activity & oral glucocorticoid | |||||
| A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate short term efficacy of Vit D supplementation on functional disability | France | 59 patients: 2 arms 29: VitD (100,000 IU) 30: Placebo/week for 6 months | • Significant improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score | • Small sample size | [ |
| • No Vit.D assessment done after the end of the study | |||||
| • No difference in disease activity scores (DAS28ESR/DAS28CRP) | |||||
The table summarizes the published clinical trial studies (Phases III & IV) on vitamin D. Details of associative and supplementation studies of vitamin D in Rheumatoid Arthritis are stated under different subheadings
Vitamin D related clinical trial studies for COVID-19
| Study AIM | Country | Sample Size | Main findings | Limitations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D-COVID-19 association studies | |||||
| Assessing the potential association between mean levels of Vit.D in various countries with cases and mortality caused by COVID-19 | 20 European Countries | • Inverse correlation between mean levels of vitamin D and number of COVID-19 cases | • Variability in number of cases/ country and number of tests performed | [ | |
| • Difference in number of infected patients/country | |||||
| Association of Vit. D levels with COVID-19 infection and hospitalization | Israel | Study Arms: COVID-positive: 782 COVID-negative: 7025 | • Suboptimal VitD levels were an independent risk factor for COVID infection and hospitalization | • Retrospective database study | [ |
| • Assessment of clinical outcomes was not performed | |||||
| Association between Vit. D deficiency and outcome of COVID-19 infection | Germany | 185 COVID Positive | • Median Vit. D level was significantly lower in the inpatient versus the outpatient subgroup | • Confirmation required in larger patient cohorts | [ |
| • Vit. D deficiency (< 12 ng/ml/30 nM) was associated with a sixfold higher course of disease and 15-fold higher risk of health | • Randomised controlled trials required | ||||
| Comparison of Vit. D levels between COVID-positive and negative patients | Switzerland | 27 COVID Positive; 80 COVID negative | • Significantly lower Vit. D levels in COVID-positive patients | • Small sample size | [ |
| • Lack of clinical information on severity of COVID-19 infection | |||||
| • No information on symptoms of COVID-negative patients | |||||
| Analyzing Vit.D levels in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and evaluating correlation with disease severity and prognosis | Italy | 42 COVID-positive patients with acute respiratory failure | • High prevalence of Vit. D deficiency in patients with severe infection posing higher mortality risk | • Small sample size | [ |
| • Relatively short follow-up of patients enrolled | |||||
| • Hypovitaminosis D as a marker for poor prognosis | |||||
| Assessing association of Vit. D deficiency with COVID-19 incidence and severity in Chinese population | China | 335 COVID-19 patients & 560 controls | • Significantly lower Vit. D levels in COVID-19 group after adjustment of age, sex and co-morbidities | • Cross-sectional study design | [ |
| • Lacks sufficient number of Vit. D measurements during the study period | |||||
| • Vit. D deficiency (< 30 nmol/L) was significantly associated with COVID-19 severity | |||||
| Vitamin D supplementation studies in COVID-19 patients | |||||
| Randomized, placebo controlled study to assess the effect of high dose Vit. D supplementation for COVID-19 viral clearance (SHADE study) | India | 40 patients, 2 arms: Intervention ( | • 62.5% patients in the intervention arm turned COVID-19 negative as compared to 20.8% patients in the control arm at the end of 7 days | • Only asymptomatic and mildly-symptomatic individuals were included | [ |
| • Higher than usual dosage of vitamin D provided that requires close follow-up for toxicity | |||||
| Quasi-experimental study to explore whether Vit.D supplementation received in the previous year and after COVID-19 infection improves survival in elderly patients | France | 77 patients | • Significant negative correlation observed between regular Vit. D supplementation (single oral dose of 80,000 IU vitamin D3 every 2–3 months) | • Study cohort restricted to nursing-home patients; unrepresentative of all older adults | [ |
| • Vit. D supplementation (80,000 IU) after diagnosis was not associated with reduced mortality | • Quasi-experimental design less robust than RCT | ||||
| • Participants in the comparing group did not receive placebo and no randomization present | |||||
| Multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to test safety and efficacy of Vit. D supplementation in severe COVID-19 patients | Brazil | 240 patients received a single dose of 200,000 IU vitamin D3 | • Vitamin D3 does not confer therapeutic benefits | • Sample heterogeneity | [ |
| • Vit. D deficient patients included less compared to other cohorts | |||||
The table summarizes the published clinical trial studies (Phases III & IV) on vitamin D in COVID-19. Details of associative and supplementation studies of vitamin D in COVID-19 are stated under different subheadings