Literature DB >> 34453608

The impact of social distancing on conjunctivitis cases-a retrospective single-center observation report.

Peter Werkl1, Lukas Hoeflechner1, Wolfgang List1, Ewald Lindner2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34453608      PMCID: PMC8401350          DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05392-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.535


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, In the end of 2019, a novel disease appeared in the Chinese city of Wuhan named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The disease spread quickly around the world [1]. As a consequence, the Austrian Government ordered the first “lockdown”, which lasted from March 16th until May 15th 2020. Shops, restaurants, hotels and schools were closed and people were ordered to stay at home except for five reasons — acute danger, necessary professional activities, necessary purchases (groceries or medication), assisting other people and outdoor activities, alone or in the company of people living in the same household. At the department of ophthalmology of the Medical University of Graz, all appointments except for emergency cases were cancelled at the beginning of the first “lockdown”. Still, all patients presenting at the department without appointment were examined at all times. Thereby, we tried to adhere to the recommendation of ophthalmological societies [2, 3]. The outbreak of COVID-19 has provided researchers with the opportunity to investigate the impact of social distancing on other common infectious diseases. One of the most common infectious eye diseases is conjunctivitis. Approximately 2% of the general population has some form of acute conjunctivitis each year [4]. Here, we wanted to examine the effect of the “lockdown” on the numbers of conjunctivitis cases presenting at our department. We analyzed the numbers of cases by retrospective chart review. Ethical approval was waived by the local institutional review board. Acute conjunctivitis was defined as an inflammation of the conjunctiva with watery or purulent discharge. Allergic conjunctivitis was diagnosed in cases of bilateral conjunctivitis and typical concomitant symptoms like watery discharge, chemosis, itching or rhinitis. Incidence rate ratios were calculated using Poisson regression with SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC, USA). p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Medical University of Graz is a tertiary referral center responsible for roughly 1 million people. So the number of cases with acute conjunctivitis in this area should be around 20,000. Most of these patients are treated by general practitioners or general ophthalmologists. Usually about 1000 patients with acute conjunctivitis present at the department of ophthalmology of the Medical University of Graz each year. The numbers of cases of acute and allergic conjunctivitis presenting at our department in March, April and May 2020 and in the same period in the previous year are shown in Table 1. We found a significant decrease of acute conjunctivitis cases during the lockdown, which could not be found for allergic conjunctivitis.
Table 1

Number of cases during the “lockdown” compared with the previous year. Percentages of cases in relation to total number of patients visiting the hospital are given in parentheses. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) comparing number of cases from March to May 2020 with the same time period in 2019, 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were calculated using Poisson regression

Total number of patientsAcute conjunctivitisAllergic conjunctivitisCorneal foreign body
2019Mar619075 (1.22)7 (0.11)119 (1.92)
Apr568294 (1.65)8 (0.14)123 (2.16)
May611295 (1.55)10 (0.16)131 (2.14)
2020Mar350037 (1.06)2 (0.06)94 (2.69)
Apr331426 (0.78)6 (0.18)112 (3.38)
May564927 (0.48)10 (0.18)135 (2.39)
IRR0.491.041.32
95% CI0.39–0.620.57–1.91.14–1.53
p-value < 0.0010.90 < 0.001
Number of cases during the “lockdown” compared with the previous year. Percentages of cases in relation to total number of patients visiting the hospital are given in parentheses. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) comparing number of cases from March to May 2020 with the same time period in 2019, 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were calculated using Poisson regression In order to investigate whether acute conjunctivitis cases were reduced because patients were afraid to visit the hospital, we looked at non-infectious diseases. For corneal foreign bodies, we did not find a reduction in cases but an increase (Table 1). Another Austrian study found that the ratio of patients with retinal detachment presenting directly at the hospital was not significantly altered during the “lockdown” [5]. Thus, we do not think that the reduction of conjunctivitis cases by more than two-thirds is only due to a fear of visiting the hospital. Our observation is supported by findings in other infectious diseases. Non-pharmaceutical interventions and behavioral changes to mitigate COVID-19 have reduced influenza by almost 80% [6]. Several studies report that national lockdowns have led to a decrease on admissions for several of the most common infectious diseases among children [7-9]. Furthermore, declining gastrointestinal infections with norovirus were observed since the outbreak of COVID-19 [10]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a reduction of conjunctivitis cases. In conclusion, we found a significant decrease of cases of acute conjunctivitis for the period of the first “lockdown”, which replicates previous finding in other infectious diseases.
  7 in total

1.  Social Distancing for COVID-19 and Diagnoses of Other Infectious Diseases in Children.

Authors:  Jonathan Hatoun; Emily Trudell Correa; Sara Mary Alice Donahue; Louis Vernacchio
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Cost effectiveness of a point-of-care test for adenoviral conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Belinda L Udeh; John E Schneider; Robert L Ohsfeldt
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.378

3.  Impact of Social Distancing and Travel Restrictions on Non-Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Non-COVID-19) Respiratory Hospital Admissions in Young Children in Rural Alaska.

Authors:  Leisha D Nolen; Sara Seeman; Dana Bruden; Joe Klejka; Chris Desnoyers; James Tiesinga; Rosalyn Singleton
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Incidence and surgical care of retinal detachment during the first SARS-CoV-2 lockdown period at a tertiary referral center in Austria.

Authors:  Markus Schranz; Michael Georgopoulos; Stefan Sacu; Adrian Reumueller; Gregor S Reiter; Georgios Mylonas; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Andreas Pollreisz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for SARS-CoV-2 on norovirus outbreaks: an analysis of outbreaks reported by 9 US States.

Authors:  Alicia N M Kraay; Peichun Han; Anita K Kambhampati; Mary E Wikswo; Sara A Mirza; Benjamin A Lopman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Impact of COVID-19 outbreaks and interventions on influenza in China and the United States.

Authors:  Luzhao Feng; Ting Zhang; Qing Wang; Shengjie Lai; Yiran Xie; Zhibin Peng; Jiandong Zheng; Ying Qin; Muli Zhang; Dayan Wang; Zijian Feng; Zhongjie Li; George F Gao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Public Health Measures on Detections of Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Children During the 2020 Australian Winter.

Authors:  Daniel K Yeoh; David A Foley; Cara A Minney-Smith; Andrew C Martin; Ariel O Mace; Chisha T Sikazwe; Huong Le; Avram Levy; Christopher C Blyth; Hannah C Moore
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 9.079

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.