Ofir Livne1, Dvora Shmulewitz2, Malka Stohl3, Zachary Mannes1, Efrat Aharonovich2, Deborah Hasin4. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States. 2. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States. 3. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: deborah.hasin@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In DSM-5, definitions of substance use disorders (SUD) were changed considerably from DSM-IV, yet little is known about how well DSM-IV and DSM-5 SUD diagnoses agree among substance users. Because data from many studies are based on DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, understanding the agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV SUD diagnoses and reasons for discordance between these diagnoses is crucial for comparing results across studies. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalences and chance-corrected agreement of DSM-5 SUD and DSM-IV substance dependence were evaluated in 588 substance users in a suburban inpatient addiction program and an urban medical center, using a semi-structured interview (PRISM-5). Alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, cocaine, heroin, opioid, sedative, and stimulant use disorders were examined. Cohen's kappa was used to assess agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV SUD (abuse or dependence), DSM-5 SUD and DSM-IV dependence, and DSM-5 moderate/severe SUD and DSM-IV dependence. RESULTS: Agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV SUD was excellent for all substances (κ = 0.84-0.99), except for cannabis and tobacco (κ = 0.75; 0.80, respectively). The most common reason for diagnostic discrepancies was a positive DSM-5 SUD diagnosis but no DSM-IV diagnosis, due to the lowered DSM-5 SUD threshold. Agreement between DSM-5 SUD and DSM-IV dependence was excellent for all substances (κ = 0.88-0.94), except for alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis (κ = 0.63-0.75). Agreement between moderate/severe DSM-5 SUD and DSM-IV dependence was excellent across all substances. CONCLUSION: While care should be used in interpreting results of studies using different methods, studies relying on DSM-IV or DSM-5 SUD diagnostic criteria offer similar information and thus can be compared when accumulating a body of evidence.
BACKGROUND: In DSM-5, definitions of substance use disorders (SUD) were changed considerably from DSM-IV, yet little is known about how well DSM-IV and DSM-5 SUD diagnoses agree among substance users. Because data from many studies are based on DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, understanding the agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV SUD diagnoses and reasons for discordance between these diagnoses is crucial for comparing results across studies. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalences and chance-corrected agreement of DSM-5 SUD and DSM-IV substance dependence were evaluated in 588 substance users in a suburban inpatient addiction program and an urban medical center, using a semi-structured interview (PRISM-5). Alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, cocaine, heroin, opioid, sedative, and stimulant use disorders were examined. Cohen's kappa was used to assess agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV SUD (abuse or dependence), DSM-5 SUD and DSM-IV dependence, and DSM-5 moderate/severe SUD and DSM-IV dependence. RESULTS: Agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV SUD was excellent for all substances (κ = 0.84-0.99), except for cannabis and tobacco (κ = 0.75; 0.80, respectively). The most common reason for diagnostic discrepancies was a positive DSM-5 SUD diagnosis but no DSM-IV diagnosis, due to the lowered DSM-5 SUD threshold. Agreement between DSM-5 SUD and DSM-IV dependence was excellent for all substances (κ = 0.88-0.94), except for alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis (κ = 0.63-0.75). Agreement between moderate/severe DSM-5 SUD and DSM-IV dependence was excellent across all substances. CONCLUSION: While care should be used in interpreting results of studies using different methods, studies relying on DSM-IV or DSM-5 SUD diagnostic criteria offer similar information and thus can be compared when accumulating a body of evidence.
Authors: Julian Santaella-Tenorio; Natalie S Levy; Luis E Segura; Pia M Mauro; Silvia S Martins Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Bridget F Grant; Tulshi D Saha; W June Ruan; Risë B Goldstein; S Patricia Chou; Jeesun Jung; Haitao Zhang; Sharon M Smith; Roger P Pickering; Boji Huang; Deborah S Hasin Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Johannes Petzold; Andy C Dean; Jean-Baptiste Pochon; Dara G Ghahremani; Richard De La Garza; Edythe D London Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 4.093
Authors: Deborah S Hasin; Efrat Aharonovich; Barry S Zingman; Malka Stohl; Claire Walsh; Jennifer C Elliott; David S Fink; Justin Knox; Sean Durant; Raquel Menchaca; Anjali Sharma Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2022-01-31
Authors: D Shmulewitz; M Stohl; E Greenstein; S Roncone; C Walsh; E Aharonovich; M M Wall; D S Hasin Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 10.592