Literature DB >> 34450189

Cost-effectiveness of stop smoking incentives for medicaid-enrolled pregnant women.

Marlon P Mundt1, Michael C Fiore2, Megan E Piper2, Robert T Adsit2, Kathleen H Kobinsky2, Kristine M Alaniz3, Timothy B Baker2.   

Abstract

Maternal smoking increases mortality and morbidity risks for both mother and infant. The First Breath Wisconsin study examined the cost-effectiveness of providing incentives to pregnant women who smoked to engage in stop smoking treatment. Participants (N = 1014) were Medicaid-enrolled pregnant women recruited from September 2012 to April 2015 through public health departments, private, and community health clinics in Wisconsin. The incentive group (n = 505) could receive $460 for completing pre-birth visits ($25 each), post-birth home visits ($40, $25, $25, $40 for 1-week, 2-month, 4-month and 6-month visits), monthly smoking cessation phone calls post-birth ($20 each), and biochemically-verified tobacco abstinence at 1-week ($40) and 6-months ($40) post-birth. The control group (n = 509) received up to $80 for 1-week ($40) and 6-month ($40) post-birth assessments. Intervention costs included incentive payments to participants, counselor and administrative staff time, and smoking cessation medications. Cost-effectiveness analysis calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per one additional smoker who quit. The incentive group had higher 6-month post-birth biochemically-confirmed tobacco abstinence than the control group (14.7% vs. 9.2%). Incremental costs averaged $184 per participant for the incentive group compared to controls ($317 vs $133). The ICER of financial incentives was $3399 (95% CI $2228 to $8509) per additional woman who was tobacco abstinent at 6 months post-birth. The ICER was lower ($2518 vs $4760) for women who did not live with another smoker. This study shows use of financial incentives for stop smoking treatment is a cost-effective option for low-income pregnant women who smoke.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Cost-effectiveness; Medicaid; Smoking and tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34450189      PMCID: PMC8595618          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  22 in total

1.  Constructing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an evaluation of parametric and non-parametric techniques using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  A H Briggs; C Z Mooney; D E Wonderling
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Infant morbidity and mortality attributable to prenatal smoking in the U.S.

Authors:  Patricia M Dietz; Lucinda J England; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Van T Tong; Sherry L Farr; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Effects of smoking cessation with voucher-based contingency management on birth outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Ira M Bernstein; Yukiko Washio; Sarah H Heil; Gary J Badger; Joan M Skelly; Tara M Higgins; Laura J Solomon
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Smoking and harm-reduction efforts among postpartum women.

Authors:  Mimi Nichter; Mark Nichter; Shelly Adrian; Kate Goldade; Laura Tesler; Myra Muramoto
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2008-09

5.  A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives to low income pregnant women to engage in smoking cessation treatment: Effects on post-birth abstinence.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; David L Fraser; Kate Kobinsky; Robert Adsit; Stevens S Smith; Lisette Khalil; Kristine M Alaniz; Tingting E Sullivan; Mimi L Johnson; Michael C Fiore
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 6.  Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy.

Authors:  Judith Lumley; Catherine Chamberlain; Therese Dowswell; Sandy Oliver; Laura Oakley; Lyndsey Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

7.  Examining two different schedules of financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant women.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Yukiko Washio; Alexa A Lopez; Sarah H Heil; Laura J Solomon; Mary Ellen Lynch; Jennifer D Hanson; Tara M Higgins; Joan M Skelly; Ryan Redner; Ira M Bernstein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Are financial incentives cost-effective to support smoking cessation during pregnancy?

Authors:  Kathleen A Boyd; Andrew H Briggs; Linda Bauld; Lesley Sinclair; David Tappin
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  Gillian D Sanders; Peter J Neumann; Anirban Basu; Dan W Brock; David Feeny; Murray Krahn; Karen M Kuntz; David O Meltzer; Douglas K Owens; Lisa A Prosser; Joshua A Salomon; Mark J Sculpher; Thomas A Trikalinos; Louise B Russell; Joanna E Siegel; Theodore G Ganiats
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Cardiovascular and metabolic influences of fetal smoke exposure.

Authors:  Hanneke Bakker; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.