| Literature DB >> 34449513 |
Sandeep Prabhu1,2, Shruti H Mehta1, Allison M McFall1, Aylur K Srikrishnan3, Canjeevaram K Vasudevan3, Gregory M Lucas4, David D Celentano1, Sunil S Solomon1,3,4.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Geographic information systems (GIS) tools can be used to understand the spatial distribution of local HIV epidemics but are often underutilized, especially in low-middle income countries. We present characteristics of an HIV epidemic within Hyderabad, a large city in southern India, as a case study to highlight the utility of such data in program planning.Cross-sectional sample recruited using respondent-driven sampling in a cluster-randomized trial.We analyzed data from 2 cross-sectional respondent-driven sampling surveys of MSM in Hyderabad, which were conducted as part of a cluster-randomized trial. All participants were tested for HIV and those positive underwent viral load quantification. ArcGIS was used to create heat maps of MSM distribution using self-reported postal code of residence and combined into larger zones containing at least 200 MSM.Postal code data was available for 661 MSM (66.2%) in the baseline and 978 MSM (97.8%) in the follow-up survey. The proportion of HIV-positive MSM (12.7-15.7%) and prevalence of virally suppressed persons (2.6-8.2%) increased between the 2 surveys. The distribution of all MSM, HIV-positive MSM, and HIV-viremic MSM differed significantly by geographic zone with several zones having higher numbers of HIV-positive and viremic individuals than would be expected based on the distribution of all MSM.The prevalence of HIV and HIV viremia among MSM differed by geographic zones within a city and evolved over time. Such data could be critical to improving program implementation efficiency by accurately targeting resources to population characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34449513 PMCID: PMC8389960 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Weighted demographics of MSM with postal code data in Hyderabad, India.
| Characteristic N (column %), median (IQR) | Baseline survey (N = 661) | Follow-up survey (N = 978) |
| Median age | 26 (22–33) | 27 (23–34) |
| Marital status | ||
| Never married | 389 (58.9) | 533 (52.6) |
| Currently married/ living with a partner | 260 (40.1) | 397 (44.8) |
| Divorced/widowed/ separated/other | 12 (1.1) | 47 (2.6) |
| Sexual identity | ||
| Panthi | 232 (44.3) | 410 (59.0) |
| Kothi | 177 (15.8) | 220 (14.0) |
| Double-decker | 230 (37.5) | 339 (26.5) |
| Gay/MSM | 11 (2.4) | 8 (0.6) |
| Bisexual | 1 (<0.01) | 1 (<0.01) |
| Education | ||
| Primary school or less | 146 (20.2) | 191 (16.9) |
| Secondary school | 255 (30.0) | 318 (34.8) |
| High school or more | 260 (39.8) | 469 (48.3) |
| Monthly income | ||
| <$50 | 142 (23.8) | 122 (13.9) |
| $50--$115 | 304 (46.0) | 228 (22.2) |
| >$115 | 215 (30.2) | 628 (63.9) |
| Ever tested for HIV | 324 (45.3) | 508 (50.2) |
| Median number of lifetime partners | 14 (5–30) | 6 (2–20) |
| Median number of partners with whom participant has had anal sex in prior 6 months | 2 (1–4) | 1 (0–2) |
| HIV-positive MSM | 121 (12.7) | 201 (15.7) |
| Viral suppression among HIV-positive MSM | 38 (20.7) | 117 (52.0) |
| Viral suppression | 38 (2.6) | 117 (8.2) |
| Prevalence of detectable viremia | 83 (10.0) | 84 (7.6) |
| Number of postal codes represented | 80 | 84 |
Figure 1Spatial distribution of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Hyderabad.