Literature DB >> 34447204

Clinical Photography Knowledge and Skills among Dental Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Rozan Khaled Albugami1, Nadin Naji Binmahfod1, Manar Abdulkareem Muhsin1, Rafal Ahmad Bamane1, Abdulrahman Dhaher Almuqrin2, Ohoud Abdullah Aldahri3, Fawaz Pullishery4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clinical photographs have become an important entity in contemporary dental education in Saudi Arabia. The study assessed the knowledge and skills related to clinical photography among final-year undergraduate dental students in different dental schools in the Western province of Saudi Arabia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A face-to-face interview was conducted using a pretested and validated questionnaire after obtaining relevant consent from the college administration and the students. Trained and calibrated data collectors interviewed the dental students between November 2019 and February 2020.
RESULTS: The knowledge related to clinical photography was "good" only in 17.2% of the participants, and most of the students demonstrated "poor" knowledge (58.9%). Digital single lens-reflex (DSLR) camera was used by only 43.9% of the students for taking clinical photographs. The practice of taking informed consent from patients for taking and using clinical photographs was reported in 77.6% of the dental students.
CONCLUSION: The knowledge related to dental clinical photography was not satisfactory, and students need to improve the understanding of the proper functioning of digital cameras and also the medicolegal issues related to clinical photography. Copyright:
© 2021 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental education; digital dentistry; photography

Year:  2021        PMID: 34447204      PMCID: PMC8375905          DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_770_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci        ISSN: 0975-7406


INTRODUCTION

Dental education has undergone a drastic transformation from the past and has evolved more to a digital era. The growth of technologic capabilities has significantly helped in improving the clinical effectiveness of dental care offered. Developments in digital photography have helped dentists to enhance their practice management skills efficiently. Data show that the use of clinical photography by dentists has increased over the past decade, and dental photographs have become inevitable documents in current dental practice.[1] In dental schools, clinical students utilize this digital photography for case discussion, presentation, and patient education and motivation. Digital dental images (DMIs) enable dental students to record key stages of treatment and could also be used as supportive documents in case of medicolegal problems, thus protecting the rights of patients and students or dentists.[2] Knowledge related to basic principles of photography, devices, accessories, their settings, setups, and documentation is essentialities to capture high-quality clinical photographs.[34] In Saudi Arabia, the dental curriculum allows the students to record and store patient's clinical photographs as a part of comprehensive clinical case management.[5] There is a lack of studies done to understand the knowledge, attitude, and practices related to digital clinical photography among dental students. These types of skills could be considered as a hidden curriculum in the current dental education system that is rarely assessed. No studies are done in the Kingdom regarding the knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding the. Thus, the current study aims to explore the level of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceptions of clinical photography among students and interns of dental schools in the Kingdom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among students pursuing their degrees in the Western Province of Saudi Arabia, including three main cities Jeddah, Makkah, and Taif. A pretested and validated questionnaire to collect information from undergraduate dental students (final year and internship) from November 2019 to February 2020. The investigators will identify participants based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Students who have not performed any clinical photography and who did not consent to participate will be excluded from assessing knowledge, practices, and experiences after the eligibility check. Face-to-face interview using the validated questionnaire was carried out using calibrated and trained data collectors. The questionnaire consisted of closed-ended questions covering the items that measure knowledge, attitude, practices, and perception regarding clinical photography skills. The validation and standardization of the questionnaire items and a standardized methodology were followed to validate this questionnaire that included focus group discussion, expert evaluation, pilot study, reliability, and validity assessment, etc. Items with correlation coefficient >0.7 were removed. In the reliability check, internal consistency was done, but test/retest reliability could not be performed because of time scarcity. A Cronbach's α value >0.7 was considered for the questionnaire to be internally consistent. A minimum sample of 276 was calculated considering the values derived from the pilot study using the software nMaster 2.0 (CMC, Vellore, India). A mixture of convenience and snowball sampling was followed, considering all the colleges in the three cities in the Western province. Data collectors briefed the participants about the study purpose and benefits. All the participants were ensured confidentiality of the information they have provided. The Research and Ethical Committee of the institution approved the study, and consent to interview the students was taken from the colleges' concerned dean where participants were pursuing their degree. All the data obtained through the questionnaire were tabulated accordingly using MS Excel software. The data analysis was done using SPSS Version 23 (IBM Corp. USA). Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize descriptive data. Pearson's Chi-square test and/or Fisher's exact test were used to see the possible association between categorical variables. A significance value (α), P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

This study assessed the basic knowledge about the properties of photography, their application, experiences, and attitudes toward dental clinical photography in their academic settings. Our study included 406 dental undergraduates students from 5th year (31.8%) and 6th year/internship (68.2%) studying in different dental schools in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. There were 11 knowledge items in the questionnaire that covered different “must know” properties/features of clinical photography. Each correct responses were given a score “1” and wrong answers were given score “0;” thus, the maximum score 1 could get was 11. The mean total knowledge score in our study was found to be 4.53 ± 3.06. The total scores were then converted into percentages, which were then categorized into “good” (>75%), fair (50%–75%), and poor (<50%). The analysis showed that 17.2% had “good,” 23.9% “fair,” and 58.9% “poor” knowledge regarding clinical photography. When the relationship of this knowledge with the participants' gender, it was found male students have shown comparatively more “good” knowledge (34.5%) than female students (10.6%), and poor knowledge was found significantly higher among females (63.1%) than male students (47.8%) that was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The sixth year/internship students had comparatively more “good” knowledge scores (17.7%) than 5th-year students (16.3%), whereas poor scores were found in 5th-year students (70.5%) than 6th-year students (53.4%), both of these associations were statistically significant (P = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences seen in knowledge between private and government dental school students [Table 1]. The knowledge related to various photographic properties and functions is depicted in Figure 1.
Table 1

Knowledge about photography and its relationship with student characteristics

KnowledgeTotalP*

GoodFairPoor
Gender, n (%)
 Male39 (34.5)20 (17.7)54 (47.8)113 (27.8)<0.001
 Female31 (10.6)77 (26.3)185 (63.1)293 (72.2)
Year, n (%)
 521 (16.3)17 (13.2)91 (70.5)129 (31.8)0.001
 6/internship49 (17.7)80 (28.9)148 (53.4)277 (68.2)
College sector, n (%)
 Private34 (14.6)54 (23.2)145 (62.2)233 (57.4)0.183
 Government36 (20.8)43 (24.9)94 (54.3)173 (42.6)

*, p<0.05 is considered statistically significant

Figure 1

Knowledge related to different parameters of camera

Knowledge about photography and its relationship with student characteristics *, p<0.05 is considered statistically significant Knowledge related to different parameters of camera When the practices related to clinical photography were explored, it was found that 74.6% (n = 303) of our study population used a camera for capturing a clinical image. Hence, we used only these students' responses (n = 303) for assessing the practices related to clinical photography. The most common type of device used to capture clinical images was the Digital Single Lens camera (DSLR) (43.9%) followed by smart phones' camera (40.6%), fixed zoom lens camera (13.5%) and point-shoot camera (2%). It was observed that 57.4% of them always used a flash while capturing clinical images [Table 2] and “Ring or Micro” flash was the commonly used one (38%), whereas 10.4% used built-in flash of the camera. It was reported by the participants that 61.4% and 61.2% of students always used a cheek/lip retractors when taking a frontal view clinical photographs and used occlusal-buccal mirrors when taking a quadrant/arch occlusal photographs, respectively. Participants who always took consent from the patients before capturing dental images were 77.6% and 60.5% of them reported that they faced some kind of objections from the patients while taking consent [Table 2].
Table 2

Practices related to clinical photography

n (%)
Used a camera for clinical photography (n=406)
 No103 (25.4)
 Yes303 (74.6)
Type of camera for capturing a dental clinical image (n=303)
 DSLR133 (43.9)
 Fixed zoom lens camera41 (13.5)
 Point-shoot camera6 (2.0)
 Smart phone’s camera123 (40.6)
Type of lens used for clinical photography (DSLR only) (n=133)
 Macro lens (50-180) (mm)61 (45.9)
 Standard lens (35-85) (mm)30 (22.6)
 Other type6 (4.5)
 I don’t know36 (27.1)
Commonly used flash for clinical photography (n=303)
 Always use flash174 (57.4)
 It depends on the amount of light95 (31.4)
 Don’t use flash at all34 (11.2)
Use a cheek and lip retractors when taking a frontal view clinical photograph (n=303)
 Always use these retractors186 (61.4)
 Use depending on the needs96 (31.7)
 Don’t use, as they are expensive21 (6.9)
Use of occlusal-buccal mirrors when taking a quadrant/arch occlusal photograph (n=303)
 Always use occlusal- buccal mirrors185 (61.1)
 Use those depending on the needs76 (25.1)
 Don’t use those, as they are expensive28 (9.2)
 Don’t use those, as they are uncomfortable14 (4.6)
Take consent from the patient before capturing clinical photographs (n=303)
 Always235 (77.6)
 Sometimes40 (13.2)
 Never28 (9.2)
Objections from patient for taking clinical photography (n=303)
 Always41 (13.5)
 Sometimes143 (47.2)
 Never119 (39.3)

DSLR: Digital single lens camera

Practices related to clinical photography DSLR: Digital single lens camera The experiences and perceptions related to clinical dental photography are illustrated in Table 3. It was reported that 41.1% (n = 167) of the participants attended course/workshops/CDE on clinical photography and 15.6% (n = 26) of them found it was very effective. When 54.4% (n = 221) reported that their academic setting provided course/workshop/CDE, 73.2% had the opinion of including clinical photography in the dental syllabus [Table 3].
Table 3

Experience and perceptions on clinical dental photography

n (%)
Experienced enhancement of clinical effectiveness with clinical photograph
 Always146 (36.0)
 Never35 (8.6)
 Sometimes225 (55.4)
Plan to continue using clinical photographs in your future practice in the same way
 Always212 (52.2)
 Never7 (1.7)
 Sometimes111 (27.3)
 Not planned yet76 (18.7)
Attended course/workshops/CDE on clinical photography
 No239 (58.9)
 Yes167 (41.1)
Outcome of the attended course/workshops/CDE on clinical photography (n=167)
 Very effective26 (15.6)
 Effective63 (37.7)
 I don’t know70 (41.9)
 Not effective8 (4.8)
Academic provide (d) course/workshop/CDE
 Yes221 (54.4)
 No116 (28.6)
 I don’t know69 (17.0)
Suggest including a course/workshop/CDE in your syllabus
 Yes297 (73.2)
 No48 (11.8)
 I don’t know61 (15.0)
Number of course/workshops/CDE on clinical photography attended
 One83 (20.4)
 More than one98 (24.1)
 I don’t remember20 (4.9)
 Didn’t attend any205 (50.5)

CDE: Continued dental education

Experience and perceptions on clinical dental photography CDE: Continued dental education

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study showed that the knowledge related to clinical photography was not satisfactory among the students. Clinical photographs have become one of the essential documents in the dental curriculum, and clinical students need to be acquainted with the properties, techniques, and equipment used for it. The clinical uses of photography for dental students include treatment planning, documentation of the treatment, follow-up, self-evaluation, and referrals to specialists or tutors for a case discussion.[6] The male students had better knowledge regarding dental photography compared to female students. This gender difference could be explained by the fact that male students usually exhibit more interest and engagement in technological activities compared to females, thus further increasing their knowledge and skills in photography.[78] Furthermore, students in the final year showed better knowledge scores than 5th-year students. The reason for this could be attributed to the formers' experience and acquaintance with clinical photography during the previous year of training. It was reported that, among students who took clinical photographs, only 43.9% used Digital single-lens camera (DSLR), and the rest used other types of cameras including smartphone cameras. A DSLR camera is favored for clinical photography because of its wide range of options to change parameters such as exposure (ISO sensitivity), aperture, shutter speed, and also the ease of use compared to the conventional ones.[9] The study showed that the knowledge related to parameters such as exposure, aperture, shutter speed, and image stabilization was poor among the students. It was found that the macro-lens (focal length of 50 mm− 1 80 mm) was used by 46% of the students who used the DSLR camera. One of the advantages of using a macro lens in dental photography is its ability to focus closely on small objects that will give you sharp images with less distortion and better color accuracy, which is very much imperative in the documentation process.[31011] Most digital cameras come up with an in-built flash, and DSLR cameras usually have it in a “pop-up” style. Sometimes, the in-built flash may not sufficient to give the required light in clinical setups, which necessitates an additional flash for improving the lighting of the objects.[12] When capturing intraoral clinical images, it is advisable to use cheek and/or lip retractors (frontal view) and mirrors (quadrant/arch occlusal view) for improved visibility.[1314] It was found that the majority of the participants always used these retractors in their practice. Another challenging aspect of clinical photography is patients' consent and confidentiality. Approximately 78% of the participants took consent from patients before taking clinical images. Dental images are used for various purposes, and there is a need to preserve the anonymity of the patient data and must be securely archived. It is the students' responsibility to take informed consent and ensure confidentiality of the images being captured.[1516] According to the data protection Act, “Patients have a fundamental legal and ethical right to determine what happens to their bodies.”[17] The unconsented use of clinical photographs may cause a loss of morality and privacy in patients. In this study, most students suggested to include a course or workshop about clinical photography in their syllabus. The findings showed that very few students attended more than one course/workshop/CDE in clinical photography. Dental colleges should impart some hands-on courses, CDE programs, and workshops on clinical photography and seriously think about the need to include some topics related to this curriculum. The study findings give us a picture that there is a need to improve the understanding of various essential aspects of digital photography among dental students, and knowledge regarding common mistakes could minimize the errors in photography, thereby achieving better clinical images. One of the study's strengths of this study is that we used a face-to face interview method to collect the response, which could have minimized the response and social desirability bias, as there were no provisions given to refer or ask the questions to someone that enabled to provide actual knowledge. The closed-ended items in the questionnaire could have increased the accuracy and inter- and intra-rater reliability in data collection.

CONCLUSION

Even though dental students used digital photography for clinical purposes, the knowledge related to the essential and fundamental properties was not that satisfactory. The findings could help the dental faculty to assess the current skills or competencies of digital photography among students and thus plan an additional course(s), workshops, CDE programs for knowledge, and skill enhancement in clinical photography.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  14 in total

1.  Health and safety issues pertaining to dental photographic mirrors and cheek and lip retractors.

Authors:  Claire Thompson
Journal:  J Audiov Media Med       Date:  2002-06

2.  Use of dental photography by general dental practitioners in Great Britain.

Authors:  M R Sharland; F J T Burke; S McHugh; A D Walmsley
Journal:  Dent Update       Date:  2004-05

Review 3.  Digital photography in the generalist's office.

Authors:  David Riba Torrecillas; Jorge Soler-González; Antonio Rodríguez-Rosich
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Digital dental photography. Part 1: an overview.

Authors:  I Ahmad
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Developing a Dental Curriculum for the 21st Century in a New Dental School in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ebtissam M Al-Madi; Manal AlShiddi; Samar Al-Saleh; Hoda AbdelLatif
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 6.  Dental photography today. Part 1: basic concepts.

Authors:  A Casaglia; P DE Dominicis; L Arcuri; M Gargari; L Ottria
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-23

7.  Clinical photographs: the gold standard, an update.

Authors:  Jonathan Sandler; Rodrigo J Gutierrez; Alison Murray
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  [A new lip-and-cheek retractor as an aid in photographic documentation].

Authors:  U Damm; H Köhler
Journal:  Dtsch Stomatol       Date:  1966-12

9.  The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.

Authors:  Diane F Halpern; Camilla P Benbow; David C Geary; Ruben C Gur; Janet Shibley Hyde; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2007-08-01

10.  Clinical photography and our responsibilities.

Authors:  Surajit Bhattacharya
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.