| Literature DB >> 34447160 |
Boraiah Shivakumar1, Rashmi Bankur2, Sudarshan Kumar Chinna3, Boraiah Niveditha4, Vipin Jain5, Deepa Sundar2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Dental age (DA) assessment is a reliable method for chronological age (CA) estimation used for criminal, forensic, and anthropologic purposes. Age estimation also provides valuable information when the birth date is unavailable, as in case of migrants. Furthermore, the CA of living people is important for employment and marriage purpose.Entities:
Keywords: Chronological age; Willems method; dental age; dental maturity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34447160 PMCID: PMC8375813 DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_693_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci ISSN: 0975-7406
Distribution of the study subjects according to gender
| Age (years) | Boys | Girls | Total ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 28 | 21 | 49 |
| 11 | 13 | 10 | 23 |
| 12 | 10 | 19 | 29 |
| 13 | 25 | 20 | 45 |
| 14 | 33 | 26 | 59 |
| Total | 109 | 96 | 205 |
Mean, standard deviation, and difference between chronological age and dental age according to Willems method using Student’s t-test
| Age group (years) | Sex |
| Mean±SD | 95 % CI of mean difference |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| CA | DA | Difference between CA and DA | Lower | Upper | |||||
| 10 | Boy | 28 | 10.03±0.58 | 9.96±0.84 | 0.07±0.19 | −0.32 | 0.45 | 0.350 | 0.728 |
| Girl | 21 | 9.79±0.56 | 10.0±1.08 | −0.25±0.27 | −0.79 | 0.29 | −0.937 | 0.354 | |
| 11 | Boy | 13 | 10.85±0.50 | 10.6±0.88 | 0.19±0.28 | −0.39 | 0.77 | 0.688 | 0.498 |
| Girl | 10 | 10.85±0.73 | 10.9±1.52 | −0.10±0.53 | −1.22 | 1.01 | −0.197 | 0.846 | |
| 12 | Boy | 10 | 11.85±0.67 | 12.2±1.78 | −0.39±0.60 | −1.65 | 0.87 | −0.645 | 0.527 |
| Girl | 19 | 11.89±0.74 | 11.3±0.83 | 0.61±0.25 | 0.095 | 1.13 | 2.399 | 0.022 | |
| 13 | Boy | 25 | 13.22±0.41 | 13.5±1.01 | −0.30±0.22 | −0.74 | 0.14 | −1.377 | 0.175 |
| Girl | 20 | 13.21±0.48 | 12.9±0.81 | 0.32±0.21 | −0.10 | 0.75 | 1.542 | 0.131 | |
| 14 | Boy | 33 | 13.93±0.57 | 14.4±1.41 | −0.43±0.27 | −0.95 | 0.10 | −1.614 | 0.111 |
| Girl | 26 | 14.30±0.72 | 13.8±0.92 | 0.54±0.23 | 0.08 | 1.00 | 2.362 | 0.022 | |
P<0.05 is statistically significant. SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidential interval, CA: Chronological age, DA: Dental age
Correlation between the chronological age and dental age using Pearson’s correlation test
| Subjects | Variables |
| Mean±SD |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girls | CA | 96 | 12.25±1.82 | 0.807** | 0.001 |
| DA | 96 | 11.98±1.74 | |||
| Boys | CA | 109 | 12.21±1.70 | 0.861** | 0.001 |
| DA | 109 | 12.40±2.17 | |||
| Overall | CA | 205 | 12.23±1.75 | 0.823** | 0.001 |
| DA | 205 | 12.20±1.99 |
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed). SD: Standard deviation, CA: Chronological age, DA: Dental age
Figure 1Distribution of subjects based on their dental and chronological age using scattered plot