| Literature DB >> 34446082 |
Fanny Olsthoorn1, Hein Sprong2, Manoj Fonville2, Mara Rocchi3, Jolyon Medlock4, Lucy Gilbert5, Jaboury Ghazoul6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lyme borreliosis and other tick-borne diseases emerge from increased interactions between humans, other animals, and infected ticks. The risk of acquiring a tick-borne infection varies across space and time, so knowledge of the occurrence and prevalence of pathogens in ticks can facilitate disease diagnosis in a specific area and the implementation of mitigation measures and awareness campaigns. Here we identify the occurrence and prevalence of several pathogens in Ixodes ricinus ticks in Wester Ross, Northwest Scotland, a region of high tourism and tick exposure, yet data-poor in terms of tick-borne pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplasmosis; Cross-sectional study; Hard tick-borne relapsing fever; Lyme borreliosis; One Health; Tick-borne diseases
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34446082 PMCID: PMC8393815 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04946-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Geographical locations of the sites used for tick collection in Wester Ross, Northwest Scotland. The map was created using the free and open source QGIS 3.8. The location of the sites was recorded with a handheld GPS, the shapefile of the United Kingdom was obtained from Runfola D, Anderson A, Baier H, Crittenden M, Dowker E, Fuhrig S, et al. (2020) geoBoundaires: A global database of political administrative boundariies. PLoS ONE 15(4)
Prevalence (Prev) ± 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the tested pathogens and their respective genospecies in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks from Wester Ross (Northwest Scotland) and from other regions of Scotland, England, Wales, and the Netherlands. Presence (+) or absence (−) of each genospecies is indicated if detected in at least one study in each region. Wester Ross (Northwest Scotland) – new data; Other regions of Scotland – combination of published and new data; England and Wales – published data; the Netherlands – published data
| Pathogen | Wester Ross (Northwest Scotland) | Other regions of Scotland | England and Wales | The Netherlands | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prev | 95% CI | Prev | 95% CI | References | Prev | 95% CI | References | Prev | 95% CI | References | |
| 4.7 | 3.9–5.5 | 0.7 | 0.0–1.6 | Gilbert and Rocchi (unpubl.) (Grampian and Inverness-shire)a | 2.3 0.68 | 1.4–3.5 | Hansford et al.2015 [ (South England) Bown et al. 2008 [ (Kielder) | 5.5 | 5–6 | Krawczyk et al. 2020 [ | |
| + | NA | NA | + | ||||||||
| + | NA | NA | + | ||||||||
| − | NA | NA | + | ||||||||
| 2.2 | 1.7–2.8 | 5.6 | NA | James et al.2013 [ | 3.9 3.3 | 2.7–5.5 NA | Hansford et al.2015 [ Bettridge et al.2013 [ | 13.3 | 12.6–14.1 | Krawczyk et al. 2020 [ | |
| 5.9 | 2.9–9.0 | Gilbert and Rocchi (unpubl.) (Grampian and Inverness-shire)a | 18.1 | NA | (North England) Hansford et al.2017 [ (Salisbury) | ||||||
| 2.2 | 1.9–2.6 | Gandy 2020 [ | 3.75 | NA | Hall 2018 [ (Lake District overall) | ||||||
| 1.7 | 1.4–2.2 | Millins et al. 2016 [ | 3.95 | 3.37–4.59 | Cull et al.2021 [ (England and Wales) | ||||||
| + | + | + | + | ||||||||
| + | + | + | + | ||||||||
| + | + | + | + | ||||||||
| + | + | + | + | ||||||||
| 0.2 | 0.06–0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0–1.9 | Gilbert and Rocchi (unpubl.) (Grampian and Inverness-shire)a | 0 | 0–0.36 | Bown et al.2008 [ (Kielder) | 0.9 | 0.7–1.1 | Krawczyk et al. 2020 [ | |
| − | NA | NA | + | ||||||||
| + | NA | NA | + | ||||||||
| – | NA | NA | + | ||||||||
| + | NA | NA | + | ||||||||
| 0.04 | 0–0.2 | NA | NA | NA | 3 | 0.95–8.5 | Tijsse-Klasen et al.2011 [ | 4.2 | 3.8–4.7 | Krawczyk et al. 2020 [ | |
| 0.4 | 0.2–0.7 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 22.9 | 22–23.9 | Krawczyk et al. 2020 [ | |
| 0.0 | < 0.1 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | 0–0.4 | Hansford et al.2015 [ (South England) | 12.2 | 11.5–12.9 | Krawczyk et al. 2020 [ | |
| 0 | 0–3.13 | Jahfari et al.2012 [ (all England and Scotland) | |||||||||
| 0.0 | < 0.1 | NA | NA | NA | 0.4 | NA | Hansford et al.2015 [ (South England) | 3 | 2.6–3.4 | Krawczyk et al. 2020 [ | |
| 0.6 | NA | Hansford et al.2017 [ (Salisbury) | |||||||||
| 0.2 | 0.08–0.38 | Cull et al.2021[ (England and Wales) | |||||||||
| 0.0 | < 0.1 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | 0–0.36 | Bown et al.2008 [ (Kielder) | 5.1 | 4.6–5.6 | Krawczyk et al. 2020 ( | |
Sample sizes as follows: Anaplasma phagocytophilum, 18/2142 positive nymphs from 26 sites; Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., 238/2264 from 26 sites; Babesia clade X, 2/362 from 22 sites
aPrevalence values from Gilbert and Rocchi (unpublished) are from nymphs (pools of three), defined as the number of positive pools divided by the number of nymphs tested per site, then averaged over all sites
bAlthough this study was partly carried out in Scotland, all Rickettsia helvetica-positive ticks were found in Devon, England