| Literature DB >> 34444201 |
Andrés F Dávalos1, Pamela K Garcia2,3, Carolina Montoya-Pachongo4,5, Andrea Rengifo1, Daniela Guerrero1, Lorena Díaz-Ordoñez6, Gustavo Díaz1,7, Beatriz E Ferro6.
Abstract
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous microorganisms naturally resistant to antibiotics and disinfectants that can colonize drinking water supply systems. Information regarding the spread of NTM in specifically South America and Colombia is limited. We aimed to identify and characterize NTM present in tap water samples from Cali, Colombia. Drinking water samples and faucet biofilm swabs were collected in 18 places, including the city's three main water treatment plants (WTPs). Filter-trapped material and eluates (0.45 μm) from swab washes were plated in 7H11 agar plates. Suspected colonies were evaluated microscopically, and NTM species were identified based on the rpoB gene. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was also performed. Fifty percent (9/18) of sampling points were positive for NTM (including two WTPs), from which 16 different isolates were identified: Mycobacterium mucogenicum (8/16), M. phocaicum (3/16), M. chelonae (2/16), M. mageritense (2/16), and M. fortuitum (1/16), all rapidly growing mycobacteria. A susceptibility profile was obtained from 68.75% (11/16) of the isolates. M. chelonae was the most resistant species. All NTM isolated are potentially responsible for human diseases; our findings might provide a baseline for exploring NTM transmission dynamics and clinical characterization, as well as potential associations between NTM species found in drinking water and isolates from patients.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; drinking water; nontuberculous mycobacteria; public health
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34444201 PMCID: PMC8392123 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Sampling points in the study area.
| Sampling Point ID | WTP/Neighborhood | Supplied by WTP | Storage Tank | Floor in the Building | NTM Species Isolated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WTP Río Cali | — | — | — | A87- |
| 2 | WTP Río Cauca | — | — | — | A18- |
| 3 | WTP Puerto Mallarino | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | Urbanización Río Lili | Puerto Mallarino * | Yes | 4 | — |
| 5 | Los Cámbulos | Río Cauca * | Yes | 2 | A21- |
| 6 | Industrial | Río Cauca * | No | 1 | |
| 7 | Las Granjas | Puerto Mallarino | No | 1 | A62- |
| 8 | Panamericano | Puerto Mallarino * | No | 1 | — |
| 9 | Refugio | Río Cauca * | Yes | 6 | — |
| 10 | Salomia | Puerto Mallarino | No | 2 | — |
| 11 | San Fernando | Río Cali | No | 1 | A37- |
| 12 | Vipasa ** | Puerto Mallarino | No | 1 | — |
| 13 | Alameda | Río Cauca * | No | 1 | A105- |
| 14 | Valle del Lili | Puerto Mallarino | Yes | 3 | A122- |
| 15 | Alfonso López ** | Puerto Mallarino | No | 2 | — |
| 16 | San Pedro | Río Cali | Yes | 1 | A114- |
| 17 | Puertas del Sol | Puerto Mallarino | No | 1 | — |
| 18 | Ciudad Córdoba | Puerto Mallarino | No | 1 | A125- |
WTP, water treatment plant; NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria. * Predominant plant supplying the sampling point. ** Some premises may receive water from both WTPs.
Figure 1Location of sampling points in the city of Cali, Colombia. WTP, water treatment plant; NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria. Numbers 1 to 22 represent division of the city in communes.
Physicochemical properties of drinking water samples.
| Parameter | Median (Interquartile Range) | Mean (Standard Deviation) | Accepted Parameters in Colombian Regulations [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) ( | 25.2 (24.6–25.4) | 24.9 (1.1) | Not regulated |
| pH ( | 7.3 (7.0–7.9) | 7.4 (0.5) | 6.5–9.0 |
| Conductivity (uS/cm) ( | 136.4 (128.3–150.4) | 139.8 (18.8) | Up to 1000 |
Figure 2Molecular phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood method.
Minimum inhibitory concentration for nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from drinking water in Cali, Colombia.
| Antimicrobial Agent | MIC (mg/L) Breakpoints | MIC (mg/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | I | R | ||||||
| Amikacin | ≤16 | 32 | ≥64 | S | I, S | S, S, S, S | S, S, S | S |
| Tobramycin | ≤4 | 8 | ≥16 | R | S, S | I, R, R, R | R, S, I | R |
| Doxycycline | ≤1 | 2–8 | ≥16 | S | R, R | R, R, S, S | I, R, S | R |
| Ciprofloxacin | ≤1 | 2 | ≥4 | S | R, I | S, R, S, S | R, R, R | R |
| Moxifloxacin | ≤1 | 2 | ≥4 | S | R, R | S, I, S, S | S, S, S | S |
| Clarithromycin | ≤2 | 4 | ≥8 | R | S, S | S, S, S, R | S, S, S | R |
| Linezolid | ≤8 | 16 | ≥32 | S | R, S | S, S, S, R | S, S, S | S |
| Imipenem | ≤4 | 8 | ≥16 | S | R, R | S, S, I, S | I, S, S | R |
| Cefoxitin | ≤16 | 32–64 | ≥128 | I | R, R | S, S, S, S | I, S, S | I |
| Sulfamethoxazole | ≤32 | - | ≥64 | S | R, R | S, S, S, R | S, S, S | - |
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; RGM, rapidly growing mycobacteria.