| Literature DB >> 34440417 |
Ibrahim Abousoliman1,2, Henry Reyer1, Michael Oster1, Eduard Murani1, Ismail Mohamed2, Klaus Wimmers1,3.
Abstract
Sheep play a critical role in the agricultural and livestock sector in Egypt. For sheep meat production, growth traits such as birth and weaning weights are very important and determine the supply and income of local farmers. The Barki sheep originates from the northeastern coastal zone of Africa, and due to its good adaptation to the harsh environmental conditions, it contributes significantly to the meat production in these semi-arid regions. This study aimed to use a genome-wide SNP panel to identify genomic regions that are diversified between groups of individuals of Egyptian Barki sheep with high and low growth performance traits. In this context, from a phenotyped population of 140 lambs of Barki sheep, 69 lambs were considered for a genome-wide scan with the Illumina OvineSNP50 V2 BeadChip. The selected lambs were grouped into divergent subsets with significantly different performance for birth weight and weaning weight. After quality control, 63 animals and 40,383 SNPs were used for analysis. The fixation index (FST) for each SNP was calculated between the groups. The results verified genomic regions harboring some previously proposed candidate genes for traits related to body growth, i.e., EYA2, GDF2, GDF10, MEF2B, SLC16A7, TBX15, TFAP2B, and TNNC2. Moreover, novel candidate genes were proposed with known functional implications on growth processes such as CPXM2 and LRIG3. Subsequent association analysis showed significant effects of the considered SNPs on birth and weaning weights. Results highlight the genetic diversity associated with performance traits and thus the potential to improve growth traits in the Barki sheep breed.Entities:
Keywords: Barki sheep; SNP chip; birth weight; growth; indigenous sheep; lamb; weaning weight
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34440417 PMCID: PMC8394750 DOI: 10.3390/genes12081243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Distribution of lambs according to their birth weight (A) and weaning weight (B). The dashed lines indicate the thresholds for classification of animals into low and high groups.
Descriptive statistics of lamb growth traits.
| Trait | Abbreviation | Group * | N | Mean | SD | Min | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth weight (kg) | BW | HBW | 31 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 4.0 | 5.0 | |
| LBW | 24 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 3.5 | |||
| Weaning weight (kg) | WW | HWW | 28 | 18.1 | 2.5 | 15.0 | 28.8 | |
| LWW | 23 | 11.2 | 1.7 | 7.4 | 13.3 |
* HBW = High birth weight, LBW = Low birth weight, HWW = High weaning weight, LWW = Low weaning weight. ** = p-value computed using t-test, SD = Standard deviation.
Figure 2Manhattan plot of the Z(F) values for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) between Barki sheep groups divergent in birth weight (LBW–HBW). Orange dots represent SNPs that passed the cutoff threshold at 99.95% of the percentile distribution (Z(F) ≥ 7.68).
Genomic positions of SNPs that exceeded the cutoff threshold (Z(FST) ≥ 7.68) for divergence in birth weight and adjacent candidate genes within a 2 Mb window.
| Rs Identifier | Chr | Position | MAF | Z( | Permutation | Association | Candidate Genes 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs426652102 | 1 | 95369397 | 0.335 | 10.68 | 0.0006 | 0.004 | |
| rs409727057 | 1 | 124117118 | 0.220 | 7.97 | 0.001 | 0.003 | |
| rs423222301 | 2 | 5472326 | 0.301 | 8.88 | 0.0006 | 0.015 | |
| rs419514091 | 2 | 60044110 | 0.369 | 8.17 | 0.0006 | 0.116 | |
| rs428614465 | 3 | 27732721 | 0.492 | 7.68 | 0.0009 | <0.0001 | |
| rs417060060 | 3 | 160252310 | 0.446 | 10.61 | 0.0003 | 0.001 | |
| rs413547561 | 5 | 31477570 | 0.481 | 8.21 | 0.001 | 0.144 | |
| rs413364871 | 6 | 51650705 | 0.301 | 10.06 | 0.0003 | 0.006 |
|
| rs427385309 | 8 | 64075259 | 0.276 | 8.00 | 0.0006 | 0.156 | |
| rs406649973 | 13 | 54940415 | 0.444 | 9.61 | 0.0003 | 0.041 | |
| rs419112095 | 13 | 54219758 | 0.295 | 8.03 | 0.0009 | 0.166 | |
| rs410323459 | 14 | 39415649 | 0.328 | 8.00 | 0.001 | 0.0006 | |
| rs423237115 | 16 | 56144068 | 0.412 | 11.67 | 0.0003 | 0.014 |
|
| rs413049228 | 16 | 18186560 | 0.134 | 7.84 | 0.009 | 0.058 | |
| rs413966946 | 17 | 6026379 | 0.465 | 9.34 | 0.0006 | 0.006 | |
| rs430430903 | 19 | 33088813 | 0.289 | 8.08 | 0.0006 | 0.046 | |
| rs417719085 | 22 | 42323039 | 0.444 | 10.23 | 0.0003 | 0.002 | |
| rs412781362 | 23 | 41177245 | 0.127 | 8.07 | 0.0009 | 0.001 | |
| rs421209784 | 24 | 18748352 | 0.086 | 7.84 | 0.0009 | 0.001 | |
| rs429736586 | 25 | 41911462 | 0.348 | 8.03 | 0.0003 | 0.064 |
1 p-value resulting from permutation-based test of F values and subsequent adjustment for genomic inflation; 2 p-value resulting from association analysis of the respective SNP with birth weight; 3 Gene names in bold = functional candidate genes, underlined = positional candidate genes, only italic = closest up- and downstream-located genes within a 2 Mb window, Chr = chromosome, MAF = minor allele frequency, Z(F) = SNP-specific Z-transformed fixation index.
Genomic positions of SNPs that exceeded the cutoff threshold (Z(FST) ≥ 6.99) for divergence in weaning weight and adjacent candidate genes within a 2 Mb window.
| Rs Name | Chr | Position | MAF | Z( | Permutation | Association | Candidate Genes 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs401497638 | 1 | 226047403 | 0.274 | 7.30 | 0.170 | 0.002 | |
| rs402362274 | 2 | 4014386 | 0.194 | 8.80 | 0.003 | 0.015 | |
| rs427650461 | 2 | 8985061 | 0.259 | 7.90 | 0.003 | 0.018 | |
| rs405054059 | 2 | 236085906 | 0.354 | 7.69 | 0.004 | 0.177 | |
| rs420573745 | 3 | 70227376 | 0.500 | 8.59 | 0.003 | 0.077 | |
| rs422502823 | 3 | 124010853 | 0.408 | 8.47 | 0.003 | 0.039 | |
| rs425747978 | 3 | 191139722 | 0.269 | 7.90 | 0.003 | 0.067 | |
| rs410754805 | 3 | 182669294 | 0.341 | 7.00 | 0.003 | 0.044 | |
| rs429678680 | 5 | 3076397 | 0.224 | 8.10 | 0.003 | 0.278 | |
| rs418926568 | 6 | 86505675 | 0.381 | 7.00 | 0.004 | 0.120 | |
| rs401888979 | 10 | 25115607 | 0.219 | 8.10 | 0.003 | 0.002 | |
| rs428497629 | 10 | 59974520 | 0.263 | 7.64 | 0.004 | 0.006 | |
| rs426943634 | 12 | 12266633 | 0.436 | 7.60 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |
| rs413169429 | 13 | 74924747 | 0.303 | 8.38 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |
| rs411451096 | 15 | 74597812 | 0.399 | 7.36 | 0.003 | 0.128 | |
| rs430684800 | 18 | 36936501 | 0.322 | 7.01 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |
| rs426036565 | 18 | 55537048 | 0.414 | 6.99 | 0.003 | 0.495 | |
| rs410079568 | 20 | 23394498 | 0.470 | 8.23 | 0.003 | 0.143 | |
| rs421690996 | 22 | 5090223 | 0.345 | 7.03 | 0.003 | 0.026 | |
| rs400432841 | 25 | 41241866 | 0.459 | 8.23 | 0.003 | 0.039 |
1 p-value resulting from permutation-based test of F values and subsequent adjustment for genomic inflation; p-value resulting from association analysis of the respective SNP with weaning weight; 3 Gene names in bold = functional candidate genes, underlined = positional candidate genes, only italics = closest up- and downstream-located genes within a 2 Mb window, Chr = chromosome, MAF = minor allele frequency, Z(FST) = SNP-specific Z-transformed fixation index.
Figure 3Manhattan plot of the Z(F) values for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of weaning weight. Orange dots represent SNPs that passed the cutoff threshold at 99.95% of the percentile distribution (Z(F) ≥ 6.99).