Koki Nakanishi1, Mitsuro Kanda2, Seiji Ito3, Yoshinari Mochizuki4, Hitoshi Teramoto5, Kiyoshi Ishigure6, Toshifumi Murai7, Takahiro Asada8, Akiharu Ishiyama9, Hidenobu Matsushita10, Dai Shimizu1, Chie Tanaka1, Michitaka Fujiwara1,11, Kenta Murotani12, Yasuhiro Kodera1. 1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan. 2. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan. m-kanda@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan. 4. Department of Surgery, Komaki City Hospital, Komaki, Japan. 5. Department of Surgery, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Japan. 6. Department of Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan. 7. Department of Surgery, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan. 8. Department of Surgery, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, Japan. 9. Department of Surgery, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki, Japan. 10. Department of Surgery, Tosei General Hospital, Seto, Japan. 11. Department of Medical Equipment and Supplies Management, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. 12. Biostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, Kurume, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We analyzed the effect of a microscopic positive margin on survival outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer METHODS: We analyzed a multi-institutional dataset to study patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. We used propensity score matching to strictly balance the patients' oncological features, backgrounds, and postoperative treatment to compare the survival outcomes of those with microscopic positive margins and those with negative margins. RESULTS: Among 3029 patients, 32 (1.1%) had positive margins. After matching, we enrolled 128 patients in this retrospective analysis: 32 with a positive margin and 96 with a negative margin. The recurrence-free survival of the positive-margin group was significantly shorter than that of the negative-margin group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.63, p = 0.0485). Consistent results were observed for patients with pStages I-III disease (HR, 1.65, p = 0.0835), whereas the survival curves overlapped in those with pStage IV disease (HR, 1.29, p = 0.5934). The prevalence of overall recurrence in the positive-margin group was higher than that in the negative-margin group (75% vs 58%, p = 0.0917). This trend was consistent with locoregional recurrence (9% vs 3%) and distant recurrence (69% vs 55%). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer was worse in those with microscopic positive margins than in those with negative margins.
PURPOSE: We analyzed the effect of a microscopic positive margin on survival outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer METHODS: We analyzed a multi-institutional dataset to study patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. We used propensity score matching to strictly balance the patients' oncological features, backgrounds, and postoperative treatment to compare the survival outcomes of those with microscopic positive margins and those with negative margins. RESULTS: Among 3029 patients, 32 (1.1%) had positive margins. After matching, we enrolled 128 patients in this retrospective analysis: 32 with a positive margin and 96 with a negative margin. The recurrence-free survival of the positive-margin group was significantly shorter than that of the negative-margin group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.63, p = 0.0485). Consistent results were observed for patients with pStages I-III disease (HR, 1.65, p = 0.0835), whereas the survival curves overlapped in those with pStage IV disease (HR, 1.29, p = 0.5934). The prevalence of overall recurrence in the positive-margin group was higher than that in the negative-margin group (75% vs 58%, p = 0.0917). This trend was consistent with locoregional recurrence (9% vs 3%) and distant recurrence (69% vs 55%). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer was worse in those with microscopic positive margins than in those with negative margins.
Authors: Paolo Aurello; Paolo Magistri; Giuseppe Nigri; Niccolò Petrucciani; Luciano Novi; Laura Antolino; Francesco D'Angelo; Giovanni Ramacciato Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.480