Literature DB >> 34433650

Genome-Derived Classification Signature for Ampullary Adenocarcinoma to Improve Clinical Cancer Care.

Saptarshi Chakraborty1, Brett L Ecker2, Mithat Gonen1, Ronglai Shen1, William R Jarnagin3, Ken Seier1, Victoria G Aveson2, Vinod P Balachandran2,4, Jeffrey A Drebin2, Michael I D'Angelica2, T Peter Kingham2, Carlie S Sigel5, Kevin C Soares2, Efsevia Vakiani5,6, Alice C Wei2, Rohit Chandwani7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The clinical behavior of ampullary adenocarcinoma varies widely. Targeted tumor sequencing may better define biologically distinct subtypes to improve diagnosis and management. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The hidden-genome algorithm, a multilevel meta-feature regression model, was trained on a prospectively sequenced cohort of 3,411 patients (1,001 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 165 distal bile-duct adenocarcinoma, 2,245 colorectal adenocarcinoma) and subsequently applied to targeted panel DNA-sequencing data from ampullary adenocarcinomas. Genomic classification (i.e., colorectal vs. pancreatic) was correlated with standard histologic classification [i.e., intestinal (INT) vs. pancreatobiliary (PB)] and clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Colorectal genomic subtype prediction was primarily influenced by mutations in APC and PIK3CA, tumor mutational burden, and DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficiency signature. Pancreatic genomic-subtype prediction was dictated by KRAS gene alterations, particularly KRAS G12D, KRAS G12R, and KRAS G12V. Distal bile-duct adenocarcinoma genomic subtype was most influenced by copy-number gains in the MDM2 gene. Despite high (73%) concordance between immunomorphologic subtype and genomic category, there was significant genomic heterogeneity within both histologic subtypes. Genomic scores with higher colorectal probability were associated with greater survival compared with those with a higher pancreatic probability.
CONCLUSIONS: The genomic classifier provides insight into the heterogeneity of ampullary adenocarcinoma and improves stratification, which is dictated by the proportion of colorectal and pancreatic genomic alterations. This approach is reproducible with available molecular testing and obviates subjective histologic interpretation. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34433650      PMCID: PMC8563403          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  31 in total

1.  Pre-validation and inference in microarrays.

Authors:  Robert J Tibshirani; Brad Efron
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2002-08-22

2.  Ampullary carcinoma is often of mixed or hybrid histologic type: an analysis of reproducibility and clinical relevance of classification as pancreatobiliary versus intestinal in 232 cases.

Authors:  Michelle D Reid; Serdar Balci; Nobuyuki Ohike; Yue Xue; Grace E Kim; Takuma Tajiri; Bahar Memis; Ipek Coban; Anil Dolgun; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Olca Basturk; David A Kooby; Juan M Sarmiento; Shishir K Maithel; Bassel F El-Rayes; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Prognostic score for recurrence after Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinomas; results of an AGEO retrospective multicenter cohort.

Authors:  O Colussi; T Voron; A Pozet; P Hammel; A Sauvanet; J B Bachet; J C Vaillant; Ph Rougier; B Nordlinger; A Berger; R Coriat; B Dousset; D Malka; T André; F Paye; T Aparicio; C Locher; D Cojean Zeleck; L Tchinou; F Bonnetain; J Taieb
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  A differential microRNA profile distinguishes cholangiocarcinoma from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Amy L Collins; Sylwia Wojcik; James Liu; Wendy L Frankel; Hansjuerg Alder; Lianbo Yu; Thomas D Schmittgen; Carlo M Croce; Mark Bloomston
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  An audit of outcomes of a series of periampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  P O Berberat; B M Künzli; A Gulbinas; T Ramanauskas; J Kleeff; M W Müller; M Wagner; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Ampullary Cancers Harbor ELF3 Tumor Suppressor Gene Mutations and Exhibit Frequent WNT Dysregulation.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Gingras; Kyle R Covington; David K Chang; Lawrence A Donehower; Anthony J Gill; Michael M Ittmann; Chad J Creighton; Amber L Johns; Eve Shinbrot; Ninad Dewal; William E Fisher; Christian Pilarsky; Robert Grützmann; Michael J Overman; Nigel B Jamieson; George Van Buren; Jennifer Drummond; Kimberly Walker; Oliver A Hampton; Liu Xi; Donna M Muzny; Harsha Doddapaneni; Sandra L Lee; Michelle Bellair; Jianhong Hu; Yi Han; Huyen H Dinh; Mike Dahdouli; Jaswinder S Samra; Peter Bailey; Nicola Waddell; John V Pearson; Ivon Harliwong; Huamin Wang; Daniela Aust; Karin A Oien; Ralph H Hruban; Sally E Hodges; Amy McElhany; Charupong Saengboonmee; Fraser R Duthie; Sean M Grimmond; Andrew V Biankin; David A Wheeler; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  The utility of immunohistochemistry in subtyping adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of vater.

Authors:  Daphne C Ang; Jinru Shia; Laura H Tang; Nora Katabi; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Novel biomarkers distinguishing pancreatic head Cancer from distal cholangiocarcinoma based on proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Takenami; Shimpei Maeda; Hideaki Karasawa; Takashi Suzuki; Toru Furukawa; Takanori Morikawa; Tatsuyuki Takadate; Hiroki Hayashi; Kei Nakagawa; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Takeshi Naitoh; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome.

Authors:  V G Cheung; N Nowak; W Jang; I R Kirsch; S Zhao; X N Chen; T S Furey; U J Kim; W L Kuo; M Olivier; J Conroy; A Kasprzyk; H Massa; R Yonescu; S Sait; C Thoreen; A Snijders; E Lemyre; J A Bailey; A Bruzel; W D Burrill; S M Clegg; S Collins; P Dhami; C Friedman; C S Han; S Herrick; J Lee; A H Ligon; S Lowry; M Morley; S Narasimhan; K Osoegawa; Z Peng; I Plajzer-Frick; B J Quade; D Scott; K Sirotkin; A A Thorpe; J W Gray; J Hudson; D Pinkel; T Ried; L Rowen; G L Shen-Ong; R L Strausberg; E Birney; D F Callen; J F Cheng; D R Cox; N A Doggett; N P Carter; E E Eichler; D Haussler; J R Korenberg; C C Morton; D Albertson; G Schuler; P J de Jong; B J Trask
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations.

Authors:  Matthew H Bailey; Collin Tokheim; Eduard Porta-Pardo; Sohini Sengupta; Denis Bertrand; Amila Weerasinghe; Antonio Colaprico; Michael C Wendl; Jaegil Kim; Brendan Reardon; Patrick Kwok-Shing Ng; Kang Jin Jeong; Song Cao; Zixing Wang; Jianjiong Gao; Qingsong Gao; Fang Wang; Eric Minwei Liu; Loris Mularoni; Carlota Rubio-Perez; Niranjan Nagarajan; Isidro Cortés-Ciriano; Daniel Cui Zhou; Wen-Wei Liang; Julian M Hess; Venkata D Yellapantula; David Tamborero; Abel Gonzalez-Perez; Chayaporn Suphavilai; Jia Yu Ko; Ekta Khurana; Peter J Park; Eliezer M Van Allen; Han Liang; Michael S Lawrence; Adam Godzik; Nuria Lopez-Bigas; Josh Stuart; David Wheeler; Gad Getz; Ken Chen; Alexander J Lazar; Gordon B Mills; Rachel Karchin; Li Ding
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 66.850

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multimodal data analysis reveals that pancreatobiliary-type ampullary adenocarcinoma resembles pancreatic adenocarcinoma and differs from cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Cheng; Yize Mao; Wenhui Hong; Wanming Hu; Peng Shu; Kun Huang; Jingjing Yu; Maofen Jiang; Liqin Li; Wei Wang; Dong Ni; Shengping Li
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 8.440

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.