Literature DB >> 34433649

RE-MIND: Comparing Tafasitamab + Lenalidomide (L-MIND) with a Real-world Lenalidomide Monotherapy Cohort in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Pier Luigi Zinzani1, Thomas Rodgers2, Dario Marino3, Maurizio Frezzato4, Anna Maria Barbui5, Claudia Castellino6, Erika Meli7, Nathan H Fowler8, Gilles Salles9, Bruce Feinberg10, Nuwan C Kurukulasuriya11, Sascha Tillmanns12, Stephan Parche11, Debarshi Dey11, Günter Fingerle-Rowson11, Sumeet Ambarkhane11, Mark Winderlich11, Grzegorz S Nowakowski13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tafasitamab, an Fc-modified, humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, in combination with lenalidomide, demonstrated efficacy in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), in the single-arm, phase II L-MIND study (NCT02399085). RE-MIND, a retrospective observational study, generated a historic control for L-MIND to delineate the contribution of tafasitamab to the efficacy of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients with R/R DLBCL treated with lenalidomide monotherapy for comparison with tafasitamab + lenalidomide-treated patients (L-MIND). Key eligibility criteria were aligned with L-MIND. Estimated propensity score-based Nearest Neighbor 1:1 Matching methodology balanced the cohorts for nine prespecified prognostic baseline covariates. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Data from 490 patients going through lenalidomide monotherapy were collected; 140 qualified for matching with the L-MIND cohort. The primary analysis included 76 patients from each cohort who received a lenalidomide starting dose of 25 mg/day. Cohort baseline covariates were comparable. A significantly better ORR of 67.1% (95% confidence interval, 55.4-77.5) was observed for the combination therapy versus 34.2% (23.7-46.0) for lenalidomide monotherapy [odds ratio, 3.89 (1.90-8.14); P < 0.0001]. Higher CR rates were achieved with combination therapy compared with lenalidomide monotherapy [39.5% (28.4-51.4) vs. 13.2% (6.5-22.9)]. Survival endpoints favored combination therapy. Lenalidomide monotherapy outcomes were similar to previously published data.
CONCLUSIONS: RE-MIND enabled the estimation of the additional treatment effect achieved by combining tafasitamab with lenalidomide in patients with R/R DLBCL. ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34433649     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  3 in total

1.  Broadening the MIND: Tafasitamab and Lenalidomide versus Synthetic Controls.

Authors:  Hua-Jay J Cherng; Jason R Westin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 2.  Anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: a narrative review with focus on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Pier Luigi Zinzani; Giorgio Minotti
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Monotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jia Li; Jianpeng Zhou; Wei Guo; Xingtong Wang; Yangzhi Zhao; Ou Bai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.