| Literature DB >> 34433011 |
Shanlin Liu1, Michael V Westbury2, Nicolas Dussex3, Kieren J Mitchell4, Mikkel-Holger S Sinding2, Peter D Heintzman5, David A Duchêne2, Joshua D Kapp6, Johanna von Seth3, Holly Heiniger4, Fátima Sánchez-Barreiro2, Ashot Margaryan2, Remi André-Olsen7, Binia De Cahsan2, Guanliang Meng8, Chentao Yang8, Lei Chen9, Tom van der Valk10, Yoshan Moodley11, Kees Rookmaaker12, Michael W Bruford13, Oliver Ryder14, Cynthia Steiner14, Linda G R Bruins-van Sonsbeek15, Sergey Vartanyan16, Chunxue Guo8, Alan Cooper17, Pavel Kosintsev18, Irina Kirillova19, Adrian M Lister20, Tomas Marques-Bonet21, Shyam Gopalakrishnan2, Robert R Dunn22, Eline D Lorenzen2, Beth Shapiro23, Guojie Zhang24, Pierre-Olivier Antoine25, Love Dalén26, M Thomas P Gilbert27.
Abstract
Only five species of the once-diverse Rhinocerotidae remain, making the reconstruction of their evolutionary history a challenge to biologists since Darwin. We sequenced genomes from five rhinoceros species (three extinct and two living), which we compared to existing data from the remaining three living species and a range of outgroups. We identify an early divergence between extant African and Eurasian lineages, resolving a key debate regarding the phylogeny of extant rhinoceroses. This early Miocene (∼16 million years ago [mya]) split post-dates the land bridge formation between the Afro-Arabian and Eurasian landmasses. Our analyses also show that while rhinoceros genomes in general exhibit low levels of genome-wide diversity, heterozygosity is lowest and inbreeding is highest in the modern species. These results suggest that while low genetic diversity is a long-term feature of the family, it has been particularly exacerbated recently, likely reflecting recent anthropogenic-driven population declines.Entities:
Keywords: Rhinoceros, Perissodactyl, Conservation genomics, Phylogenomics, Genomic diversity.
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34433011 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell ISSN: 0092-8674 Impact factor: 41.582