| Literature DB >> 34432228 |
Yi-Bing Guo1,2, Wei-Jia Gao3, Zhi-Liang Long1, Wei-Fang Cao4, Dong Cui5, Yong-Xin Guo4, Qing Jiao6, Jian-Feng Qiu4, Lin-Yan Su7, Guang-Ming Lu8.
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is clinically defined by alternating depressive and manic episodes with a separated period of euthymia. Thalamo-frontal loop plays vital role in psychotic symptoms, altered motor control and executive difficulties in BD. It remains unclear that structural and functional alterations of thalamo-frontal loop among the different mood states in BD, especially in pediatric BD(PBD).Twenty manic PBD (mPBD), 20 euthymic PBD (ePBD) and 19 healthy controls (HCs) were included in the study. By analyzing the T1 images and fMRI signals, thalamus volume and frontal grey matter cortical thickness were tested, and functional connectivity (FC) between bilateral thalamus and frontal cortex was calculated. Relationship between clinical indices and thalamo-frontal FC was also evaluated in mPBD and ePBD adolescents.Compared to HCs, the cortical thickness of left middle frontal gyrus (MFG), bilateral superior frontal gyrus (SFG) was significantly decreased in both mPBD and ePBD patients, and volume of left thalamus and cortical thickness of right MFG significantly decreased in mPBD patients. Compared to that of the HCs and ePBD subjects, thalamo-frontal hyperconnectivity with MFG was found in mPBD, and compared with that of HCs, thalamo-frontal hypoconnectivity with precentral gyrus/SFG was found in ePBD. In ePBD patients, episode times positively correlated with FC values between thalamus and precentral gyrus.The findings of the present study demonstrate detailed knowledge regarding shared and specific structural and functional disruption in thalamo-frontal loop in mPBD and ePBD subjects. Thalamo-frontal abnormalities reported in adult BD subjects were also observed in adolescent BD patients, and thalamo-frontal dysfunction may be a crucial treatment target in BD.Entities:
Keywords: Euthymic pediatric bipolar disorder; Functional connectivity; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Manic pediatric Bipolar disorder; Thalamo-frontal loop
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34432228 PMCID: PMC8500876 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00539-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Imaging Behav ISSN: 1931-7557 Impact factor: 3.978
Demographic characteristics and clinical variables
| Characteristics | mPBD(n = 20) | ePBD(n = 20) | HCs(n = 19) | Statistic(F/T/χ2) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 8/12 | 10/10 | 7/12 | 0.76c | 0.684 |
| Age (years) | 15.10 ± 1.65 | 15.30 ± 1.72 | 14.16 ± 1.57 | 2.641a | 0.080 |
| Education (years) | 8.35 ± 1.76 | 8.40 ± 1.85 | 7.47 ± 2.22 | 1.385 a | 0.259 |
| IQ | 100.10 ± 13.56 | 107.50 ± 9.62 | 105.32 ± 7.51 | 2.579 a | 0.085 |
| YMRS scores | 34.60 ± 6.32 | 5.35 ± 1.60 | 3.63 ± 2.06 | 380.3 a | < |
| MFQ scores | 7.20 ± 2.59 | 6.60 ± 4.44 | 6.37 ± 3.00 | 0.305 a | 0.738 |
| Onset age (years) | 14.00 ± 1.69 | 13.50 ± 2.09 | 0.833b | 0.410 | |
| Illness duration (months) | 13.65 ± 11.46 | 22.55 ± 17.56 | -1.898 b | 0.065 | |
| Episode times | 3.05 ± 1.70 | 4.65 ± 7.53 | -0.926 b | 0.360 | |
| Psychotic symptoms (yes/no) | 9/11 | 12/8 | 0.902 c | 0.342 | |
| BD-I/BD-II | 16/4 | 12/8 | 1.905 c | 0.168 | |
| Familial BD history (yes/no) | 7/13 | 6/14 | 0.114 c | 0.736 | |
| Medications | |||||
| Lithium(n/%) | 9/45% | 7/35% | |||
| Valproate(n/%) | 11/55% | 15/75% | |||
| Atypical antipsychotics(n/%) | 14/70% | 17/85% | |||
| Antidepressants(n/%) | 1/5% | ||||
a one-way ANOVA; b Two-sample t-test; c chi-square test.
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
mPBD: manic pediatric bipolar disorder; ePBD: euthymic pediatric bipolar disorder; HCs: healthy controls; IQ: intelligence quotient; YMRS: Young Manic Rating Scale; MFQ: Mood and Feelings Questionnaire; BD-I, bipolar disorder type I; BD-II, bipolar disorder type II.
Regions showing differences in thalamic volume and frontal grey matter thickness among mPBD, ePBD patients and HCs
| Region | Main effect | Post Hoc | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mPBD vs. ePBD | mPBD vs. HCs | ePBD vs. HCs | |||||||||
| F | p | T | p | Cohen’d | T | p | Cohen’d | T | p | Cohen’d | |
| THA.L | 6.184 | 0.004** | -1.790 | 0.237 | -0.589 | -3.516 | 0.003** | -1.044 | -1.749 | 0.257 | -0.585 |
| THA.R | 2.474 | 0.093 | |||||||||
| IFG.ope.L | 3.934 | 0.025* | -0.062 | 1.000 | -0.02 | ||||||
| IFG.orb.L | 2.569 | 0.086 | |||||||||
| IFG.tri.L | 3.091 | 0.053 | |||||||||
| MFG.L | 4.906 | 0.011* | -0.37 | 1.000 | -0.12 | -2.892 | 0.016* | -0.95 | -2.517 | 0.044* | -0.83 |
| SFG.L | 6.585 | 0.003** | -0.005 | 1.000 | -0.001 | -3.159 | 0.008** | -1.04 | -3.153 | 0.008** | -1.04 |
| PreCG.L | 2.441 | 0.096 | |||||||||
| IFG.ope.R | 3.691 | 0.031* | -0.939 | 1.000 | -0.30 | -2.681 | 0.029* | -0.88 | -1.754 | 0.255 | -0.57 |
| IFG.orb.R | 0.405 | 0.669 | |||||||||
| IFG.tri.R | 2.083 | 0.134 | |||||||||
| MFG.R | 3.555 | 0.035* | -1.280 | 0.617 | -0.42 | -2.666 | 0.030* | -0.87 | -1.401 | 0.499 | -0.46 |
| SFG.R | 4.264 | 0.019* | -0.128 | 1.000 | -0.04 | -2.601 | 0.036* | -0.85 | -2.473 | 0.049* | -0.81 |
| PreCG.L | 2.131 | 0.128 | |||||||||
mPBD: manic pediatric bipolar disorder; ePBD: euthymic pediatric bipolar disorder; HCs: healthy controls; THA.L: left thalamus; THA.R: right thalamus.
Presented adjusted p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference (Bonferroni corrected).
**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.
IFG.ope: opercular inferior frontal gyrus; IFG.orb: orbital inferior frontal gyrus; IFG.tri: triangular inferior frontal gyrus; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; SFG: superior frontal gyrus.
Fig. 1Statistical difference maps showing difference in thalamo-frontal FC among mPBD, ePBD patients and HCs by ANOVA analysis. (p < 0.05, GRF corrected). THA.L: left thalamus; THA.R: right thalamus; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; SFG: superior frontal gyrus; PreCG: precentral gyrus
Regions showing difference in thalamo-frontal FC among mPBD, ePBD patients and HCs
| Brodmann | MNI Coordinates | Peak F value | Cluster size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFG.R SFG.R PreCG.L | 9 6 6 | 25 30 37 24 -9 72 -30 -15 72 | 8.63 8.17 5.32 | 71 62 63 |
| MFG.R | 11 | 27 51 6 | 6.78 | 57 |
| MFG.R | 9 | 24 27 39 | 6.27 | 58 |
mPBD: manic pediatric bipolar disorder; ePBD: euthymic pediatric bipolar disorder; HCs: healthy controls; L: left; R:right; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; SFG: superior frontal gyrus; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; PreCG: precentral gyrus.
Fig. 2Pair wise comparison of z values of thalamo-frontal FC in mPBD, ePBD and HCs groups. (Two-sample T test; p < 0.05, Bonferroni corrected) mPBD: manic pediatric bipolar disorder; ePBD: euthymic pediatric bipolar disorder; HCs: healthy controls; L: left; R: right; SFG: superior frontal gyrus; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; PreCG: precentral gyrus; BA: Brodmann area *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001
Fig. 3Voxel-wised correlation analysis between episode times and thalamo-frontal FC values in euthymic PBD. Episode times positively correlated with FC between THA.L and PreCG.R(A, C) and FC between THA.R and PreCG.R(B, D) (GRF corrected, voxel p < 0.005, cluster p < 0.05). Asterisk (*) represents the adjusted values with age and gender regressed. PreCG: precentral gyrus; L: left; R: right