Literature DB >> 3443207

A review of autorefractors.

I C Wood1.   

Abstract

The overall performance of autorefractors in this study as defined by reliability, validity and rejection rate statistics, is similar to other hospital based studies but lower than in an optometric clinic. The performance of individual autorefractors varies according to the interaction between the underlying optical/detector mechanism and the media and pathological changes of a given eye. The autorefraction data proves a useful complement to the refractive data gained by conventional techniques, notwithstanding the poorer performance of the autorefractors in the presence of senescent pathology.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3443207     DOI: 10.1038/eye.1987.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Objective autorefraction in posterior chamber pseudophakia.

Authors:  P S Raj; T Akingbehin; A M Levy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Clinical evaluation of automated refraction in anterior chamber pseudophakia.

Authors:  P Sunder Raj; J R Villada; K Myint; A E Lewis; T Akingbehin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Robert P L Wisse; Marc B Muijzer; Francesco Cassano; Daniel A Godefrooij; Yves F D M Prevoo; Nienke Soeters
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.