| Literature DB >> 34432004 |
Márton Tokodi1, Attila Oláh1, Alexandra Fábián1, Bálint Károly Lakatos1, István Hizoh1, Mihály Ruppert1, Alex Ali Sayour1, Bálint András Barta1, Orsolya Kiss1, Nóra Sydó1, Emese Csulak1, Zsuzsanna Ladányi1, Béla Merkely1, Attila Kovács1, Tamás Radovits1.
Abstract
AIMS: We sought to investigate the correlation between speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE)-derived myocardial work (MW) and invasively measured contractility in a rat model of athlete's heart. We also assessed MW in elite athletes and explored its association with cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)-derived aerobic capacity. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: athlete’s heart; contractility; myocardial work; speckle-tracking echocardiography
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34432004 PMCID: PMC8788018 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 2047-2404 Impact factor: 6.875
Myocardial work in the rat model of athlete’s heart
| MCo | MEx | FCo | FEx |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLS (%) | −16.3 ± 1.3 | −20.3 ± 2.0* | −19.0 ± 1.4 | −21.5 ± 1.3 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.195 |
| GMWI ( mmHg·%) | 1989 ± 268 | 2600 ± 163* | 2248 ± 220 | 2890 ± 305 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.859 |
| CMWI (mmHg·%) | 2341 ± 290 | 2915 ± 211* | 2550 ± 261 | 3214 ± 364 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.658 |
| WMWI (mmHg·%) | 11 ± 8 | 5 ± 4 | 10 ± 10 | 17 ± 9 | 0.085 | 0.796 | 0.029 |
| MWE (%) | 98 ± 1 | 99 ± 1 | 98 ± 1 | 98 ± 1 | 0.275 | 0.519 | 0.065 |
Values are mean ± SD.
P < 0.05 vs. MCo,
P < 0.05 vs. FCo.
Statistical test: two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the factors ‘Sex’ and ‘Exercise’. The P-value for sex-exercise interaction (PInter) was also calculated.
CMWI, constructive myocardial work index; FCo, female control group; FEx, female exercised group; GLS, global longitudinal strain; GMWI, global myocardial work index; MCo, male control group; MEx, male exercised group; MWE, myocardial work efficiency; WMWI, wasted myocardial work index.
Myocardial work in human athletes and controls
| MCo | MAth | FCo | FAth |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLS (%) | −18.6 ± 1.1 | −17.0 ± 1.6 | −19.0 ± 0.7 | −18.2 ± 1.2 | 0.046 | 0.002 | 0.344 |
| GMWI (mmHg·%) | 1784 ± 280 | 1916 ± 127 | 1726 ± 187 | 1882 ± 149 | 0.460 | 0.025 | 0.846 |
| CMWI (mmHg·%) | 2038 ± 253 | 2187 ± 164 | 1954 ± 136 | 2151 ± 134 | 0.297 | 0.004 | 0.676 |
| WMWI (mmHg·%) | 66 ± 30 | 90 ± 27 | 62 ± 26 | 64 ± 47 | 0.170 | 0.220 | 0.312 |
| MWE (%) | 97 ± 1 | 96 ± 1 | 97 ± 1 | 97 ± 2 | 0.240 | 0.451 | 0.246 |
Values are mean ± SD.
P < 0.05 vs. MCo,
P < 0.05 vs. FCo.
Statistical test: two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the factors ‘Sex’ and ‘Exercise’. The P-value for sex-exercise interaction (PInter) was also calculated.
CMWI, constructive myocardial work index; FAth, female athlete group; FCo, female control group; GLS, global longitudinal strain; GMWI, global myocardial work index; MAth, male athlete group; MCo, male control group; MWE, myocardial work efficiency; WMWI, wasted myocardial work index.