| Literature DB >> 34431696 |
Anand V Sastry1, Nicholas Dillon2,3,4, Amitesh Anand1, Saugat Poudel1, Ying Hefner1, Sibei Xu1, Richard Szubin1, Adam M Feist1,5, Victor Nizet2,3, Bernhard Palsson1,2,5.
Abstract
In vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing often fails to accurately predict in vivo drug efficacies, in part due to differences in the molecular composition between standardized bacteriologic media and physiological environments within the body. Here, we investigate the interrelationship between antibiotic susceptibility and medium composition in Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 as contextualized through machine learning of transcriptomics data. Application of independent component analysis, a signal separation algorithm, shows that complex phenotypic changes induced by environmental conditions or antibiotic treatment are directly traced to the action of a few key transcriptional regulators, including RpoS, Fur, and Fnr. Integrating machine learning results with biochemical knowledge of transcription factor activation reveals medium-dependent shifts in respiration and iron availability that drive differential antibiotic susceptibility. By extension, the data generation and data analytics workflow used here can interrogate the regulatory state of a pathogen under any measured condition and can be applied to any strain or organism for which sufficient transcriptomics data are available. IMPORTANCE Antibiotic resistance is an imminent threat to global health. Patient treatment regimens are often selected based on results from standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) in the clinical microbiology lab, but these in vitro tests frequently misclassify drug effectiveness due to their poor resemblance to actual host conditions. Prior attempts to understand the combined effects of drugs and media on antibiotic efficacy have focused on physiological measurements but have not linked treatment outcomes to transcriptional responses on a systems level. Here, application of machine learning to transcriptomics data identified medium-dependent responses in key regulators of bacterial iron uptake and respiratory activity. The analytical workflow presented here is scalable to additional organisms and conditions and could be used to improve clinical AST by identifying the key regulatory factors dictating antibiotic susceptibility.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-seq; antibiotics; independent component analysis; iron regulation; machine learning; transcriptional regulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34431696 PMCID: PMC8386450 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00443-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 5.029
FIG 1Global comparative analysis of the E. coli transcriptome across three media compositions. (a) Pairwise differentially expressed genes across COG categories between CA-MHB media, M9 minimal media, and R10LB media. Orange bars represent upregulation and blue bars represent downregulation. (b) Top two principal component loadings for the PRECISE data set, comprising 278 RNA-seq profiles (12), combined with the data generated in this study. (c) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) compared to the number of differential iModulon activities (DiMAs). (d to f) Proportion of expression deviation explained by eight groups of iModulons. iModulon activities in each group are shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. S2b and d and reported in Table S1.
FIG 2Mechanisms underlying the complex transcriptional response to different media. Bar charts show the iModulon activities for fear-greed iModulons (a), carbon source catabolism iModulons (b), amino acid and vitamin B iModulons (c), nucleotide biosynthesis iModulons (d), respiration iModulons (e), and iron-related iModulons (f). iModulon activities are computed relative to a reference condition (wild-type MG1655 grown in M9 minimal media from the PRECISE database). Individual measurements for independent biological replicates are plotted on top of bars. Asterisks (*) indicate a statistically significant differential iModulon activity (FDR < 0.1) between two of the three medium compositions (CA-MHB, M9, and R10LB). All other iModulons with significant activity differences are shown in Fig. S2b to d.
MIC90 of nine antibiotics on three media
| Antibiotic (abbreviation) | Drug information | MIC90 (μg/ml) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | Target process | CA-MHB | M9 | R10LB | |
| Ampicillin (AMP) | Penicillin | Cell wall | 64 | >16 | 256 |
| Ceftriaxone (CTR)* | Cephalosporin | Cell wall | 0.25 | 0.016 | 0.25 |
| Ciprofloxacin (CIP)* | Quinolone | DNA gyrase | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Fosfomycin (FOS) | Fosfomycin | Cell wall | 16 | 64 | >64 |
| Meropenem (MEM)* | Carbapenem | Cell wall | 0.016 | 0.031 | 0.13 |
| Nitrofurantoin (NIT) | Furan | Multiple | 256 | 128 | >512 |
| Plazomicin (PLZ) | Aminoglycoside | 30S inhibitor | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Rifampin (RIF) | Rifampin | Transcription | 16 | 8 | NA |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (T/S)* | Pyrimidine/sulfa | Folate synthesis | 1 | 0.13 | 1 |
*, Selected for further analysis.
FIG 3Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of three antibiotics across three medium conditions. (a) Survival rates under different antibiotic concentrations. Black bars designate the concentration of antibiotics used in RNA-seq cultures (i.e., MIC90 in relevant media). Missing bars indicate the measured CFU are below the limit of detection. (b) Bar chart comparing MBC99 of each antibiotic across media. T/S, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; CTR, ceftriaxone; CIP, ciprofloxacin.
FIG 4Selected transcriptional trade-offs that are independent of drug targets. Arrows indicate the effect of antibiotic treatment in rich media. (a) Pairwise comparison of iModulon activity changes between treated and untreated cells across three media. Colored points outside the dashed lines indicate statistically significant iModulon activities. (b) Scatterplot of the RpoS and Translation iModulon activities across PRECISE. (c) Scatterplot of the Crp-1 and Crp-2 iModulon activities across PRECISE. iModulon activities from CRP knockout and partial knockout strains are also shown. (d) Scatterplot of Fnr and ArcA iModulon activities across PRECISE. Anaerobic respiration conditions from PRECISE are also highlighted. (e) Oxygen consumption over time, as measured by normalized fluorescence, in CA-MHB and R10LB.
FIG 5iModulon responses specific to antibiotic treatments. (a) iModulon activities of untreated and T/S-treated cells for four selected iModulons. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant iModulon activity difference (FDR < 0.1). (b) iModulon activities of untreated and CTR-treated cells for two selected iModulons. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant iModulon activity difference (FDR < 0.1). (c) iModulon activities of the DNA-damage response regulator LexA in untreated and CIP-treated cells. (d) Scatterplot of the Fur-1 and Fur-2 iModulon activities. Expression profiles from PRECISE are shown in light gray, and other colors are described in the legend. (e) Venn diagram comparing the genes in the Fur-1 and Fur-2 iModulons. (f) Venn diagram comparing the DEGs between ciprofloxacin and untreated cells in CA-MHB and R10LB media.