| Literature DB >> 34431446 |
Ruijun Ji1,2,3,4,5, Wenjuan Wang1,2, Xinyu Liu1, Linlin Wang1, Ruixuan Jiang1,2, Runhua Zhang1,2, Dandan Wang1,2, Jiaokun Jia1,2, Hao Feng1,2, Zeyu Ding1,2, Yanfang Liu1,2, Gaifen Liu1,2, Jingjing Lu1,2, Yi Ju1,2, Xingquan Zhao1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
To systematically compare 27 ICH models with regard to mortality and functional outcome at 1-month, 3-month and 1-year after ICH. The validation cohort was derived from the Beijing Registration of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Poor functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) ≥3 at 1-month, 3-month and 1-year after ICH, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to assess model discrimination and calibration. A total number of 1575 patients were included. The mean age was 57.2 ± 14.3 and 67.2% were male. The median NIHSS score on admission was 11 (IQR: 3-21). For predicting mortality at 3-month after ICH, AUROC of 27 ICH models ranged from 0.604 to 0.856. In pairwise comparison, the ICH-FOS (0.856, 95%CI = 0.835-0.878, P < 0.001) showed statistically better discrimination than other models for mortality at 3-month after ICH (all P < 0.05). For predicting poor functional outcome (mRS≥3) at 3-month after ICH, AUROC of 27 ICH models ranged from 0.602 to 0.880. In pairwise comparison with other prediction models, the ICH-FOS was superior in predicting poor functional outcome at 3-month after ICH (all P < 0.001). The ICH-FOS showed the largest Cox and Snell R-square. Similar results were verified for mortality and poor functional outcome at 1-month and 1-year after ICH. Several risk models are externally validated to be effective for risk stratification and outcome prediction after ICH, especially the ICH-FOS, which would be useful tools for personalized care and clinical trial in ICH.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34431446 DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2021.1967678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Res ISSN: 0161-6412 Impact factor: 2.448