| Literature DB >> 34430806 |
Anthony D Junker1, Staffan Jacob2, Hervé Philippe2, Delphine Legrand2, Chad G Pearson1.
Abstract
Dispersal is the movement of organisms from one habitat to another that potentially results in gene flow. It is often plastic, allowing organisms to adjust dispersal movements depending on environmental conditions. A fundamental aim in ecology is to understand the determinants underlying dispersal and its plasticity. We utilized 22 strains of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila to determine if different phenotypic dispersal strategies co-exist within a species and which mechanisms underlie this variability. We quantified the cell morphologies impacting cell motility and dispersal. Distinct differences in innate cellular morphology and dispersal rates were detected, but no universally utilized combinations of morphological parameters correlate with dispersal. Rather, multiple distinct and plastic morphological changes impact cilia-dependent motility during dispersal, especially in proficient dispersing strains facing challenging environmental conditions. Combining ecology and cell biology experiments, we show that dispersal can be promoted through plastic motility-associated changes to cell morphology and motile cilia.Entities:
Keywords: Cell biology; Evolutionary biology; Microorganism
Year: 2021 PMID: 34430806 PMCID: PMC8367785 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Figure 1Differential dispersal propensities in T. thermophila strains
(A) Schematic of the two-patch dispersal system composed of 1.5 mL conical tubes connected by a narrow passageway. Cells in dispersal assays are seeded in the left patch and allowed to disperse to the right patch over 4 hr.
(B) Dispersal propensity is different between the 22 T. thermophila isolates. Dispersal rate is measured as a ratio between number of dispersers and total number of cells in 5 separate biological replicates. Graph shows the mean and standard deviation in dispersal rate for each strain. Red line and transparent red band denote the inter-strain mean and inter-strain standard deviation for all strains.
(C) Fluorescence image of T. thermophila cell with labeled BBs (α-TtCen1; green) and cilia (α-α-tubulin; magenta) (scale bar, 10 μm). Schematic of cell morphologies that were measured in the 22 T. thermophila isolates.
(D) Schematic for T. thermophila cell behavior measurements (scale bar, 10 μm).
Figure 2Increased linearity of swimming in high disperser cells correlates with narrow cell shape and longer cilia
(A) Fluorescence images of BBs (α-TtCen1; greyscale) and cell morphology from the three highest and three lowest dispersing strains among the 22 T. thermophila strains (scale bar, 10 μm) (n = 19.7 ± 1.7 cells per strain). Graphs indicate the individual mean and standard deviation for each morphology parameter relative to the mean morphology for all strains (red line).
(B) Plot of correlations between the ranked morphologies and the dispersal rate of the 22 T. thermophila strains (n = 19.7 ± 1.7 cells per strain).Correlation was calculated using linear regression between morphologies. Correlation is defined as F-test non-zero slopes of p=<0.05 denoted by a boxed blue “+1” (positive correlation) or orange “-1” (negative correlation), and no correlation is defined as F-test non-zero slopes of p=>0.05 denoted by a black boxed by “0” (see STAR Methods).
(C) Plot of the ranked innate aspect ratio (cell length/width) and innate cilia length relative to ranked swimming linearity (displacement/total distance) in disperser cells. Linear regression shows slopes are non-zero for aspect ratio (p = 0.04) and cilia length (p = 0.03). Higher ranked numbers (0–22) denote increased ranked linearity, increased ranked aspect ratio, and longer ranked cilia.
(D) Model of T. thermophila cell morphology relative to swimming behavior during dispersal.
Figure 3BB and cilia density and cell length increase in higher dispersing cells
(A) Cell length in D4 disperser cells relative to resident cells is reduced at 180 (p < 0.0001) and 360 (p = 0.02) min, cell length decreases in D5 disperser cells at 180 and 360 (p < 0.0001) min. Cell length remains the same in B2086 cells at 180 (p = 0.09) min and decreases at 360 (p = 0.03) min. Cell length measurements were taken from 3 biological replicates with n = 35.6 ± 2.1 cells per condition and time point (total of 534 cells measured). Data are represented as strain mean (black bar), the experimental means (hollow circles), and individual cell length (dots).
(B) BB density in D4 disperser cells relative to resident cells is unchanged at 180 min (p = 0.15) and 360 min (p = 0.33). BB density is increased in D5 disperser cells at 180 and 360 min (p < 0.0001). BB density is increased in B2086 disperser cells at 180 and 360 min (p < 0.0001). The measurements for BB density were taken from 3 biological replicates n = 28.9 ± 1.1 cells per condition and time point (total of 434 cells). Data are represented as strain mean (black bar), the experimental means (hollow circles), and mean cell BB density (dots).
(C) Schematic for how a decrease in cell length can increase BB (and ciliary) density.
Figure 4Starvation-induced dispersal increases BB density and formation of a caudal cilium
(A) BB localization (α-TtCen1; greyscale) and cell morphology in D4, D5, and B2086 cells from cycling (fed) and starved conditions (scale bar, 10 μm).
(B) Starved D4, D5, and B2086 cells swim faster than fed cells (p < 0.0001, 0.02, and 0.01, respectively). Maximum speeds of both B2086 and D5 are 2.8-fold faster than the maximum speed of D4. The measurements for swim speeds were taken from 3 biological replicates n = 30.2 ± 2.4 cells per condition (total of 181 cells). Data are represented as strain mean (black bar), the experimental means (hollow circles), and individual cell speed (dots).
(C) Starved cells increase in cell aspect ratio after starvation for all strains (p < 0.0001 for D4, D5, and B2086). The measurements for aspect ratio were taken from 3 biological replicates n = 36.6 ± 4.7 cells per condition (total of 220 cells). Data are represented as strain mean (black bar), the experimental means (hollow circles), and individual cell aspect ratio (dots).
(D) Cell length decreases in all strains after starvation (D4, p < 0.0001; D5, p = 0.01; B2086, p < 0.0001). The measurements for cell length were taken from 3 biological replicates n = 36.6 ± 4.7 cells per condition (total of 220 cells). Data are represented as strain mean (black bar), the experimental means (hollow circles), and individual cell length (dots).
(E) Cell width decreases after starvation (p < 0.0001 for D4, D5, and B2086). The measurements for cell width were taken from 3 biological replicates n = 36.6 ± 4.7 cells per condition (total of 220 cells). Data are represented as strain mean (black bar), the experimental means (hollow circles), and individual cell width (dots).
(F) Starved D4 and B2086 (D4 n = 604 cells, B2086 n = 555 cells) cells do not generate a caudal cilium while starved D5 cell (D5 n = 600 cells) exhibit a subpopulation of cells with a caudal cilium (p < 0.0001). Data are represented as strain mean and standard deviation (black bars), and the experimental means (hollow circles).
(G) Model of D5 cell and cilia location (left). Fluorescence images of the caudal or cell posterior end in starved D5 cells. BBs are stained for BBs (α-TtCen1, red) and cilia (α -glutamylated and α-α-tubulin; green) (scale bar, 5 μm).
(H) The caudal cilium is longer than the average cortical medial cilium (p < 0.0001) (n = 26 caudal cilia from 26 cells, n = 300 cilia from 30 cells). Data are represented as a morphotype mean (black bar), the experimental means (hollow circles/squares), and mean cilia length of individual cells (dots).
(I) Starved D5 cells with a caudal cilium have an increased aspect ratio (narrow cell shape) compared with starved D5 cells without a caudal cilium (p < 0.0001) (n = 26 cells with caudal cilia, n = 42 cells without caudal cilia). Data are represented as the morphotype mean (black bar), the experimental means (hollow circles/squares), and the aspect ratio of individual cells (dots).
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| α-TtCen1 | ( | NA |
| α-glutamylation GT335 | Adipogen | Cat# AG-20B-0020-C100 |
| α-α-tubulin 12G10 | DSHB | Cat# AB_1157911 |
| Alexa Fluor 488 goat α–rabbit IgG | Invitrogen | Cat# A11034 |
| Alexa Fluor 594 goat α–rabbit IgG | Invitrogen | Cat# A32740 |
| Alexa Fluor 647 goat α–rabbit IgG | Invitrogen | Cat# A21244 |
| Alexa Fluor 488 goat α–mouse IgG | Invitrogen | Cat# A11029 |
| Alexa Fluor 594 goat α–mouse IgG | Invitrogen | Cat# A32742 |
| Alexa Fluor 647 goat α–mouse IgG | Invitrogen | Cat# A21236 |
| Polyethelene oxide | ACROS Organics™ | Cat # AC183220050 |
| Citifluor™ Mountant solution AF1 | Ted Pella Inc. | Cat # 17,970-25 |
| T. thermophila: Doerder strains 1-22 | tetrahymena.vet.cornell.edu | |
| T. thermophila: B2086 | tetrahymena.vet.cornell.edu | Cat # SD01625 |
| Prism8 | GraphPad Software | San Diego, California USA, |