Literature DB >> 34429649

Predictive Factors for Target Organ Injuries in Hypertensive Individuals.

Manoel Paz Landim1, Luciana Neves Cosenso-Martin1, Aleandra Polegati Santos1, Jessica Rodrigues Roma Uyemura1, Leticia Barufi Fernandes1, Valquiria da Silva Lopes1, Juan Carlos Yugar-Toledo1, Jose Fernando Vilela-Martin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The causal relationship between systemic arterial hypertension and target organ damage (TOD) is well known, as well as the association with cardiovascular risk factors (CV). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is important in monitoring hypertension and assessing the risk of TOD.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between blood pressure (BP) and clinical and biochemical parameters in the development of TOD in hypertensive patients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study with 162 hypertensive patients followed for an average period of 13 years. The TOD investigated were left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), microalbuminuria, coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke. Blood pressure was assessed by ABPM and LVH using echocardiogram and electrocardiogram, respectively. Biochemical-metabolic tests and 24-hour microalbuminuria were performed at baseline and follow-up. The P-value <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: The average age was 69±11.8 years, with a predominance of women (64.8%), white ethnicity (79.6%) and diabetics (78.4%). ABPM showed a significant reduction in BP values during follow-up, although without association with TOD (microalbuminuria, stroke, and CAD), except for LVH that showed a correlation with sleep BP ≥120/70 mmHg (P=0.044). The most frequent TODs were LVH (29.6%), microalbuminuria (26.5%), CAD (19.8%) and stroke (17.3%). In the follow-up, there was an association between LVH and diabetes; microalbuminuria was associated with diabetes and triglycerides; stroke was associated with HDL-cholesterol (HDL-c), microalbuminuria and carotid disease. CAD showed a relationship with age and HDL-c.
CONCLUSION: Predictive factors for TOD are age, microalbuminuria, diabetes, HDL-c, triglycerides and carotid disease. Nocturnal BP is correlated with LVH. The absence of a relationship between ABPM and other TODs can be explained by the use of effective drugs, improvement of metabolic and blood pressure parameters.
© 2021 Paz Landim et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  albuminuria; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; arterial hypertension; coronary artery disease; left ventricular hypertrophy; stroke

Year:  2021        PMID: 34429649      PMCID: PMC8374840          DOI: 10.2147/IBPC.S324151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control        ISSN: 1178-7104


Introduction

The causal relationship between hypertension and target organ damage (TOD) is well known;1 however, the numerical value of blood pressure (BP) from which chronic complications in the target organs begin is still discussed.2 The concept of prehypertension illustrates the demand for cutoff points in the BP values from which there is greater or lesser involvement of susceptible organs and to which subpopulation of hypertensive patients the same would apply.3 Thus, the appropriate BP values for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), the elderly, patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and individuals after stroke remain undefined. It remains the subject of research regarding the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke and cardiovascular death that are directly affected by the most severe stages of hypertension. A study of 4319 individuals showed that cardiovascular outcomes were related to the presence of pre-existing subclinical lesions in isolation or in association, without direct dependence on BP values.4 However, most publications evaluated the measure of office BP, sometimes restricted to the systolic component.4 SPRINT Trial recently demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events associated with more intensive BP control in the office.5 On the other hand, the BP obtained by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has shown greater accuracy of adverse events in relation to office BP, mainly in patients with masked hypertension. In individuals with normal office BP and altered ABPM, there was a higher prevalence of TOD, an unfavorable metabolic profile and a high risk of cardiovascular events compared to patients with normal ABPM. Therefore, ABPM assesses the severity of BP, by analyzing the pressure load on the heart and vessels, predicting cardiovascular risk.6 In addition to the BP assessment, the combination of pre-existing TODs increases the risk of developing new injuries by 3.8% and this information is essential to classify cardiovascular risk, corroborated by the most recent guidelines.7,8 The present study evaluated the relationship between BP values obtained by ABPM, metabolic-biochemical parameters and the development of TOD in a population of hypertensive patients followed up in a specialized outpatient clinic.

Method

Population

Three hundred and ninety-seven hypertensive patients treated at the specialized hypertension outpatient clinic in the university hospital at State Medical School at Sao Jose Rio Preto were selected in a retrospective cohort study in the period from 2000 to 2016. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution (CAAE: 20642013.0.0000.5415, no. 427.788 of 10/08/2013). The inclusion criteria were as follows: two ABPMs, two microalbuminuria measurements in 24-hour urine, serum glucose, creatinine, uric acid and lipid measurements, at different times, at baseline (beginning) and at the end of the follow-up. Secondary hypertension, smokers, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/m2 and individuals with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 were excluded. The smoker individuals were excluded for two main reasons: small group of smokers <5% and inconsistent data described about the past and current conditions. After evaluating the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 162 individuals were included. Participants were assessed for gender, race/ethnicity, age, BMI and follow-up time. Diabetes was defined according to the Brazilian Diabetes Society.9 Dyslipidemia was identified by the measurements of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and triglycerides (TG) after a 12-hour fast. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) fraction was calculated using the formula LDL-c = TC - HDL-c - TG/5 (for TG <400 mg/dL). The use of statins, fibrates, salicylates and antihypertensive treatment was also evaluated, according to the pharmacological classes: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin 2 receptor blockers (ARBs), thiazide diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, spironolactone and others, all with regular use for more than one year.

Target Organ Damage

All TODs were determined at baseline and at the end of the follow-up. TOD patients at some stage in the follow-up period were included. The following injuries were assessed: left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), microalbuminuria, stroke and CAD. Left ventricular hypertrophy was defined by means of electrocardiogram (ECG), using Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell voltage criteria, and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), with determination of left ventricular mass (LVM).7,10,11 Increased LVM was considered >198 g for women and >294 g for men.10,11 Microalbuminuria was analyzed in 24-hour urine and was considered abnormal ≥30 mg/day. Individuals with data on the medical records of long-term disability, neurologic dysfunction, cognitive impairment and suspected ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke were submitted to computed tomography or brain magnetic resonance imaging for diagnostic confirmation of cerebral damage. Cerebral micro-bleeding was also included as stroke. Moreover, subjects with diagnostic hypothesis of transitory ischemic attack with normal brain image exams were not included. All the asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals were submitted to tests to evaluate CAD. Subjects with abnormal stress test results, including typical chest pain, were submitted to myocardial scintigraphy or invasive coronary angiography, depending on indication. Significant CAD was defined by invasive coronary angiography as >50% stenosis of the left main stem and/or >70% stenosis in a major coronary vessel.12,13 In cases of MI, the diagnosis was based on clinical history and confirmed by analysis of medical records that showed previous enzymatic alterations (troponin and CK-MB), electrocardiographic alterations suggestive of coronary ischemia and proper treatment for this situation. Duplex ultrasound was used to identify the carotid stenosis, which was considered present when >50% luminal narrowing.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

ABPM was performed with the Spacelabs 90207 device with software for programming the equipment and issuing reports. It was installed during the day and, for 24 hours, it recorded BP measurements every 20 minutes during wakefulness, and every 30 minutes during sleep. Participants were instructed to note daily activities, waking and sleeping times, medications and symptoms, defining periods of wakefulness and sleep. ABPM evaluated systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure in 3 periods: 24 hours, wakefulness and sleep. The values of BP < 130/80 within 24 hours, <135/85 during wakefulness and <120/70 mmHg during sleep were considered normal. Nocturnal dipper (ND) was standardized as drop ≥10% of SBP in the period of wakefulness to sleep.

Laboratory Tests

Blood samples were collected after 12 hours of fasting to measure TC, HDL-c, TG, blood glucose, uric acid, serum creatinine and HbA1c. The tests were determined by the electrochemiluminescence method in a COBAS C 501 device with the Roche reagent. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)14 equation and microalbuminuria was measured in 24-hour urine. HbA1c was measured using the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, with the Premier HB 9210 device.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as frequency. All clinical, laboratory, ABPM, ECG and echocardiogram parameters were separated into “baseline”, when they were the results of the first annotation in the chart and “follow-up”, when they represented the last annotation. Student’s t-test was used to assess the difference between the start and follow-up parameters. Qualitative variables were analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Variables associated with the TOD outcome in the univariate analysis with values of p < 0.10 were candidates for the multivariate logistic regression model. The final variables of the model with values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. The statistical analysis was performed using the IBM-SPSS Statistics for Windows version 21.0 software; IBM Corporation, NY, USA). All tests were two-tailed and P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The population studied was 162 individuals, with a mean age of 69 ± 11.8 years, BMI = 29.27 kg/m2 and a mean follow-up of 13 ± 3.13 years (varying from five to fifteen years). The majority of patients (67.3%) were followed-up for more than 10 years. The majority of the sample was composed of women (64.8%) and white ethnicity. The prevalence of DM was 78%. Thiazide diuretics and ARBs were the most widely used antihypertensive drugs, more than 70% (Table 1). Table 2 describes the TOD prevalence in the final part of the study. The most prevalent TOD was LVH (on echocardiography, 29.6%), followed by microalbuminuria (26.5%), CAD (19.8%), and stroke (17.3%). In the follow-up, there was a significant reduction in mean SBP and DBP with ABPM and dyslipidemia parameters. There was no difference in office BP values and other laboratory parameters and LVM during follow-up (Table 3). The parameters of glycemic control, eGFR and office BP showed no association with TOD.
Table 1

Demographic and General Characteristics at Baseline

Categorical VariablesN%
Female10564.8
Ethnicity (white)12979.6
Diabetes Mellitus12778.4
Microalb ≥ 30 mg/24 h4225.9
LVM (TTE) (M > 294 g / W > 198 g)5232.1
LVH ECG3521.6
Betablocker treatment7848.1
CCB treatment8049.4
ARB treatment11973.5
ACE inhibitors treatment4829.6
Diuretic treatment12677.8
Spironolactone treatment169.9
Aspirin treatment7848.1
Statin treatment9256.8
Fibrate treatment53.1
Other drugs2515.4
Nocturnal Dipping ABPM5634.6

Abbreviations: Microalb, microalbuminuria; LVM, left ventricular mass; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; M, man; W, woman; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; ECG, electrocardiogram; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCB, calcium channel blocker; ARB, angiotensin 2 receptor blocker; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Table 2

Target Organ Damage of the Population at Follow-Up

Categorical VariablesN%
Microalb ≥ 30 mg/24 h4326.5
LVM (TTE) (M > 294 g/W > 198 g)4829.6
LVH ECG2414.8
Presence of CAD3219.8
Presence of stroke2817.3
Presence of carotid artery disease4326.5
Nocturnal Dipping ABPM4729.0

Abbreviations: Microalb, microalbuminuria; LVM, left ventricular mass; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; M, man; W, woman; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; ECG, electrocardiogram; CAD, coronary artery disease; ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Table 3

Laboratory and Left Ventricular Mass (Echocardiogram) Parameters, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Values at Baseline and at Follow-Up

VariablesBasalFollow-UpP-value
Mean/SDMean/SD
TC (mg/dL)221.5±57.7177.3±49.8<0.001
HDL-c (mg/dL)45.9±13.550.7±13.4<0.001
LDL-c (mg/dL)139.5±53.196.4±41.8<0.001
TG (mg/dL)166.7±100.2142.4±95.60.001
eGFR (CKD-EPI)65.2±19.465.2±24.20.997
Glucose (mg/dL)148 ± 43.5137.5 ± 42.60.238
HbA1c (%)7.5±1.77.3±1.30.398
Uric Acid (mg/dL)5.9±1.86.0±1.90.164
24 h Microalb (mg)34.4±60.663.0±211.80.664
LVM (g)207.5±68.3205.9±67.40.689
OSBP (mmHg)143.9±21.8140.4±18.20.187
ODBP (mmHg)87.4 ±13.185.9 ±11.70.203
24 h SBP (mmHg)138.5±16.0132.9±14.7<0.001
24 h DBP (mmHg)83.3±12.178.1±10.9<0.001
Awake SBP (mmHg)140.4±16.4134.4±15.0<0.001
Awake DBP (mmHg)85.0±12.479.4±11.6<0.001
Sleep SBP (mmHg)133.2±17.5128.4±16.50.001
Sleep DBP (mmHg)78.4±13.273.5±11.6<0.001

Abbreviations: TC, total cholesterol; HDL-c, high density cholesterol; LDL-c, low density cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; eGFR (CKD-EPI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (Chronic Kidney Disease- Epidemiology Collaboration); HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; Microalb, microalbuminuria; LVM, left ventricle mass; OSBP, office systolic blood pressure; ODBP, office diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation.

Demographic and General Characteristics at Baseline Abbreviations: Microalb, microalbuminuria; LVM, left ventricular mass; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; M, man; W, woman; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; ECG, electrocardiogram; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCB, calcium channel blocker; ARB, angiotensin 2 receptor blocker; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Target Organ Damage of the Population at Follow-Up Abbreviations: Microalb, microalbuminuria; LVM, left ventricular mass; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; M, man; W, woman; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; ECG, electrocardiogram; CAD, coronary artery disease; ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Laboratory and Left Ventricular Mass (Echocardiogram) Parameters, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Values at Baseline and at Follow-Up Abbreviations: TC, total cholesterol; HDL-c, high density cholesterol; LDL-c, low density cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; eGFR (CKD-EPI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (Chronic Kidney Disease- Epidemiology Collaboration); HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; Microalb, microalbuminuria; LVM, left ventricle mass; OSBP, office systolic blood pressure; ODBP, office diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation. The correlation between ABPM parameters and TOD was examined using the Fisher’s exact test. The relationship was demonstrated at baseline for LVH (both TTE and ECG) and nocturnal dipper (P=0.001 and P=0.016, respectively), as well as LVH (by ECG) and sleep BP ≥120/70 mmHg (P=0.029). However, only LVH (by TTE) and sleep BP ≥120/70 mmHg remained correlated at follow-up (P=0.044). All other correlations among the observed parameters of ABPM and TOD were not found. The variables submitted to univariate logistic regression are shown in Table 4. The mean BP in sleep ≥120/70 mmHg (follow-up ABPM) showed a significant relationship with LVH and the 24-hour DBP with CAD. ABPM showed no association with the parameters basal and follow-up of eGFR and microalbuminuria.
Table 4

Univariate Logistic Regression for Target-Organ Damages at Follow-Up

LVHMicroalbStrokeCAD
ORICPORICPORICPORICP
AGE1.020.99–1.060.1081.000.97–1.030.9401.020.98–1.050.3301.061.02–1.100.003
GENDER (MALE)0.510.24–1.090.0811.130.55–2.330.7463.021.31–6.960.0091.850.84–4.060.125
DM3.071.11–8.480.033.431.13–10.400.0291.010.38–2.730.9800.790.32–1.940.603
TC1.000.99–1.010.7091.011.00–1.010.0781.000.99–1.010.8841.000.99–1.000.222
TG1.000.99–1.010.3501.011.01–1.050.0031.001.00–1.010.2341.01.00–1.010.292
HDL-C0.980.96–1.010.2380.980.95–1.010.1110.950.92–0.990.0160.950.92–0.990.009
MICROALB > 30 MG1.010.96–1.040.1023.621.55–8.450.0030.580.22–1.520.269
24 H DBP1.00.97–1.030.9981.020.99–1.060.1531.010.97–1.050.6160.960.92–1.000.049
SLEEP SBP1.021.00–1.040.0821.010.99–1.040.2001.000.98–1.030.8801.020.99–1.040.134
SLEEP DBP1.031.00–1.050.0921.031.00–1.060.0921.010.98–1.050.4340.980.94–1.010.233
BP > 120/703.091.01–9.430.0471.920.68–5.400.2160.760.28–2.080.5931.220.43–3.50.708
LVH (ECG)1.020.98–1.040.0972.951.12–7.800.0291.860.70–4.960.215
CAROTID DISEASE0.980.95–1.030.1041.030.99–1.050.2423.621.55–8.450.0032.281.01–5.150.047

Note: The significant P-values are marked in bold.

Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high-density cholesterol; Microalb, microalbuminuria; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BP, blood pressure; LVH (ECG), left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy (assessed by left ventricular mass); CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value.

Univariate Logistic Regression for Target-Organ Damages at Follow-Up Note: The significant P-values are marked in bold. Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high-density cholesterol; Microalb, microalbuminuria; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BP, blood pressure; LVH (ECG), left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy (assessed by left ventricular mass); CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value.

Left Ventricular Mass

Upon univariate analysis, LVM (by TTE) showed significance with DM and with sleep BP (ABPM) ≥120/70, but in multivariate logistic regression only DM remained significant (P = 0.037) (Table 5).
Table 5

Multivariate Logistic Regression for Target-Organ Damages at Follow-Up

LVHMicroalbStrokeCAD
ORICPORICPORICPORICP
AGE1.071.03–1.110.002
DM3.01.07–8.390.0375.171.51–17.740.009
TG1.011.00–1.050.01
HDL-C0.950.90–0.990.0270.950.91–0.980.004
MICROALB4.271.50–12.170.007
CAROTID DISEASE3.121.09–8.900.034

Note: The significant P-values are marked in bold.

Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high density cholesterol; Microalb, microalbuminuria; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy (assessed by left ventricular mass); CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value.

Multivariate Logistic Regression for Target-Organ Damages at Follow-Up Note: The significant P-values are marked in bold. Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high density cholesterol; Microalb, microalbuminuria; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy (assessed by left ventricular mass); CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value.

Microalbuminuria

Multivariate logistic regression showed that the predictors of microalbuminuria were the presence of DM and TG (Table 5).

Stroke

Regarding stroke, the statistical significance of univariate analysis was for male gender, HDL-c, follow-up microalbuminuria >30 mg/day, carotid disease and LVH by ECG (Table 4). Multivariate analysis showed statistically significant HDL-c, microalbuminuria >30 mg/day and carotid disease for stroke (Table 5).

Coronary Artery Disease

The multivariate analysis demonstrated statistical relevance for age and follow-up HDL-c (Table 5).

Discussion

The present study of hypertensive patients followed for a mean of 13 years ± 3 years demonstrated that the office BP values and the ABPM were not directly related to the development of TOD (microalbuminuria, stroke and CAD), considering the normal behavior of the BP during wakefulness and the close to adequate control in the 24 h (ABPM), a fact that reduced the association of hypertension with these evaluated organic lesions. Hypertension is involved in more than 50% of deaths caused by CVD,15,16 being a risk factor with a greater impact for stroke compared to CAD. Thus, BP control is critical to prevent TODs induced by hypertension, according to a meta-analysis that compared intensive BP control versus standard.17 In addition to BP control, the high percentage of treatment with target organ protective antihypertensive drugs (thiazides and blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system) may also have contributed to this finding.18–20 Additionally, the follow-up showed improvement in dyslipidemia; however, diabetes control has not changed. Therefore, the results showed the importance of other risk factors for the development of TOD, other than just BP. Renal function, glycemia, and microalbuminuria remained stable during follow-up, demonstrating that adequate BP control may have influenced these subclinical TODs in the long term. According to Clement et al, who evaluated the association between ABPM and subsequent cardiovascular events in 1963 treated hypertensive patients followed for 5 years, a mean 24-hour SBP lower than 135 mmHg decreased cardiovascular risk even after adjustment for office BP and other confounders.21 In our study, the mean 24-hour SBP of follow-up was 132.9 mmHg, a fact that may explain the TOD protection found in cases of microalbuminuria, stroke and CAD. However, the only ABPM parameter correlated to TOD in the follow-up, in this case LVH, was sleep BP ≥120/70 mmHg. Therefore, our results demonstrated that ABPM correlates to LVH, similar to study performed by Bliziotis et al, who showed relationship more important between ABPM and LV geometry than office BP.22 The most frequent TOD in our study was LVH (observed by LVM), similar to a study that showed LVH prevalence ranging from 36% to 41%.23 Considering that almost 80% of our sample had DM, a higher prevalence could be expected of LVH, since Cuspidi et al demonstrated a higher prevalence of LVH (58% to 77%) in conditions, such as severe hypertension, DM or cardiovascular disease.24 On the other hand, Wang et al found a 23% prevalence of LVH in asymptomatic diabetics over 65 years of age, similar to our study.25 In any case, the use of drugs that act on ventricular remodeling and the reduction in BP observed by ABPM may explain the lower prevalence of LVH in our sample.18,26 However, the LVM calculation method without body surface correction may have interfered with our results. According to Yildiz et al, the two-dimensional echocardiogram is the most used in the evaluation of the LV (left ventricular) geometry and the relative thickness of the LV wall; however, it is less accurate in asymmetric hypertrophy.23 Our patients had hypertension with concentric hypertrophy, which is expected in this morbidity. Thus, as it is difficult to establish standards for assessing LVM, correcting for body surface or height, especially in extreme obesity,23 we consider that the exclusion of moderate to severe obesity in our series reduced the probable interference of obesity in LVM calculation. Although the two outcomes assessed, LVH and CAD, showed a significant relationship with ABPM on univariate analysis, they did not remain on multivariate. As discussed previously, the Fisher’s correlation showed an association between LVH and sleep BP ≥ 120/70 mmHg, a situation observed by other authors, who described that LVM correlated with the nocturnal systolic component of BP27 and with no difference in BP between waking and sleeping periods.6,28,29 Similarly, the SPRINT study demonstrated that intensive control of systolic BP (SBP < 120 mmHg) decreased the risk of developing LVH and caused LVH regression in individuals with this pre-existing change.30 In the present study, DM was an independent predictor of LVH, a fact that was also observed in prediabetic patients by other authors.31,32 The LVH assessment, using ECG, was related to stroke, even though multivariate analysis was not significant. Corroborating this finding, the ALLHAT study reported an association between LVH (by ECG) and increased cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality in treated hypertensive patients.33 More recently, Cao et al showed that each 19 mmHg increase in SBP led to a 49% higher risk of LVH, emphasizing the importance of ECG as a predictor of LVH.34 Regarding microalbuminuria, DM and TG were predictors of this subclinical lesion, compatible with studies in diabetics35 and non-diabetics.36 Additionally, TG can be a predictor of decline in renal function.37,38 In our study, better glycemic control (HbA1c = 7.3%) had no influence on the presence of microalbuminuria, since this correlation has been found with higher HbA1c values (>10.5%).39 Our results demonstrated that HDL-c, microalbuminuria ≥30 mg and the presence of carotid disease were associated with the development of stroke. The protective association of HDL-c for stroke has also been previously demonstrated for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.40,41 Most diabetics in our sample reaffirm the impact of DM as a risk factor for stroke, since albuminuria in diabetics increased the risk of stroke in about 80%.42 On the other hand, the SPRINT trial found an association between microalbuminuria and stroke in the absence of DM.43 Our study did not show an association between glycemia and stroke, as HbA1c was close to normal, unlike the higher risk of stroke observed with HbA1c > 10%.42 Finally, the presence of CVD, including peripheral arterial disease, CAD and carotid disease, represents a well-established risk factor for stroke.44,45 Regarding CAD, there was no association with 24-hour DBP, a finding similar to two American studies, NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey/2013–2016) and ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study).46 We also observed that only age and HDL-c were predictors of CAD, which is consistent with large observational studies.47,48 In our data, we observed that the average HDL-c of around 50 mg/dL led to a reduction in relative risk by about 5%. Recently, a cardiovascular risk survey of the Brazilian adult population showed that age and HDL-c were indicators of CV risk.49

Study Limitations and Strengths

Some limitations deserve to be mentioned. Initially, it was a retrospective observational cohort study with analysis of medical records, which could change the accuracy of the data, although the inclusion and exclusion criteria tried to reduce this effect. Secondly, we did not use LV mass index calculation to assess LVH, but only LVM. However, we consider that the exclusion of obese patients with grades 2 and 3 reduced possible interferences. Third, smoking was not assessed as a risk factor due to inconsistent medical record data. Fourth, CAD was considered only in patients undergoing hemodynamic evaluation, not including individuals with possible coronary lesions, without imaging exams. Finally, the sample number may have influenced variables that are generally associated with TODs. As this is a real-life study, of a cohort of hypertensive individuals with established TOD, this research highlights the impact of risk factors and complications generated by hypertension throughout the natural history of the disease. The exclusion of smokers and moderate to severe obesity reduced the confounding factors in the data analysis. Finally, the lack of correlation between TOD and BP values (observed by ABPM), except for nocturnal BP, which correlated with LVH, reaffirms the importance of controlling other risk factors with measures that act in the progression of atherosclerotic disease.

Conclusion

In a population of hypertensive patients, mostly diabetic, followed for about 13 years, LVH was the most prevalent TOD, followed by microalbuminuria, CAD and stroke. LVH was associated with DM and microalbuminuria. Microalbuminuria was a predictive factor for stroke and HDL-c showed an inverse relationship with stroke and CAD. There was no association of ABPM parameters with microalbuminuria, stroke, and CAD. However, sleep BP on the ABPM was correlated with LVH. Satisfactory BP control, use of effective drugs in reducing CV risk and improvement of other metabolic parameters during follow-up were protective factors in this cohort of hypertensive patients.
  46 in total

1.  Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension.

Authors:  Denis L Clement; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk A De Bacquer; Peter W de Leeuw; Daniel A Duprez; Robert H Fagard; Peter J Gheeraert; Luc H Missault; Jacob J Braun; Roland O Six; Patricia Van Der Niepen; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: assessment with echocardiography and effects of antihyperglycemic treatments.

Authors:  Katsuomi Iwakura
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-10-15

3.  The 50% coronary stenosis.

Authors:  Robert L Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Prevalence of left-ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: an updated review of echocardiographic studies.

Authors:  C Cuspidi; C Sala; F Negri; G Mancia; A Morganti
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Hypertension: SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

Authors:  Elsayed Z Soliman; Walter T Ambrosius; William C Cushman; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Jeffrey T Bates; Javier A Neyra; Thaddeus Y Carson; Leonardo Tamariz; Lama Ghazi; Monique E Cho; Brian P Shapiro; Jiang He; Lawrence J Fine; Cora E Lewis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Clinical relevance of nighttime blood pressure and of daytime blood pressure variability.

Authors:  P Palatini; M Penzo; A Racioppa; E Zugno; G Guzzardi; M Anaclerio; A C Pessina
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-09

7.  Diagnosis of Nonischemic Stage B Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal Parameters for Prediction of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Hong Yang; Quan Huynh; Mark Nolan; Kazuaki Negishi; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16

Review 8.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and hypertension.

Authors:  Mehmet Yildiz; Ahmet Afşin Oktay; Merrill H Stewart; Richard V Milani; Hector O Ventura; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 8.194

9.  A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The association between glycemic control and microalbuminuria in Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Anwar Ali Showail; Medhat Ghoraba
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2016-05
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Epoxylipids and soluble epoxide hydrolase in heart diseases.

Authors:  John D Imig; Ludek Cervenka; Jan Neckar
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.858

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.