Literature DB >> 34427465

Breast MRI during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Lack of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Suppression and Inferior Treatment Response.

Natsuko Onishi1, Wen Li1, David C Newitt1, Roy J Harnish1, Fredrik Strand1, Alex Anh-Tu Nguyen1, Vignesh Amal Arasu1, Jessica Gibbs1, Ella F Jones1, Lisa J Wilmes1, John Kornak1, Bonnie N Joe1, Elissa R Price1, Haydee Ojeda-Fournier1, Mohammad Eghtedari1, Kathryn W Zamora1, Stefanie Woodard1, Heidi R Umphrey1, Michael T Nelson1, An L Church1, Patrick J Bolan1, Theresa Kuritza1, Kathleen Ward1, Kevin Morley1, Dulcy Wolverton1, Kelly Fountain1, Dan Lopez Paniagua1, Lara Hardesty1, Kathleen R Brandt1, Elizabeth S McDonald1, Mark Rosen1, Despina Kontos1, Hiroyuki Abe1, Deepa Sheth1, Erin Crane1, Charlotte Dillis1, Pulin Sheth1, Linda Hovanessian-Larsen1, Dae Hee Bang1, Bruce Porter1, Karen Y Oh1, Neda Jafarian1, Luminita A Tudorica1, Bethany Niell1, Jennifer Drukteinis1, Mary S Newell1, Marina E Giurescu1, Elise Berman1, Constance D Lehman1, Savannah C Partridge1, Kimberly A Fitzpatrick1, Marisa H Borders1, Wei Tse Yang1, Basak Dogan1, Sally Hayward Goudreau1, Thomas Chenevert1, Christina Yau1, Angela DeMichele1, Donald A Berry1, Laura J Esserman1, Nola M Hylton1.   

Abstract

Background Suppression of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is commonly observed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at contrast-enhanced breast MRI. It was hypothesized that nonsuppressed BPE may be associated with inferior response to NAC. Purpose To investigate the relationship between lack of BPE suppression and pathologic response. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed for women with menopausal status data who were treated for breast cancer by one of 10 drug arms (standard NAC with or without experimental agents) between May 2010 and November 2016 in the Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging and Molecular Analysis 2, or I-SPY 2 TRIAL (NCT01042379). Patients underwent MRI at four points: before treatment (T0), early treatment (T1), interregimen (T2), and before surgery (T3). BPE was quantitatively measured by using automated fibroglandular tissue segmentation. To test the hypothesis effectively, a subset of examinations with BPE with high-quality segmentation was selected. BPE change from T0 was defined as suppressed or nonsuppressed for each point. The Fisher exact test and the Z tests of proportions with Yates continuity correction were used to examine the relationship between BPE suppression and pathologic complete response (pCR) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HR-negative cohorts. Results A total of 3528 MRI scans from 882 patients (mean age, 48 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) were reviewed and the subset of patients with high-quality BPE segmentation was determined (T1, 433 patients; T2, 396 patients; T3, 380 patients). In the HR-positive cohort, an association between lack of BPE suppression and lower pCR rate was detected at T2 (nonsuppressed vs suppressed, 11.8% [six of 51] vs 28.9% [50 of 173]; difference, 17.1% [95% CI: 4.7, 29.5]; P = .02) and T3 (nonsuppressed vs suppressed, 5.3% [two of 38] vs 27.4% [48 of 175]; difference, 22.2% [95% CI: 10.9, 33.5]; P = .003). In the HR-negative cohort, patients with nonsuppressed BPE had lower estimated pCR rate at all points, but the P values for the association were all greater than .05. Conclusions In hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, lack of background parenchymal enhancement suppression may indicate inferior treatment response. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Philpotts in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34427465      PMCID: PMC8574064          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  33 in total

1.  Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Anjali S Kumar; Daniel F Chen; Alfred Au; Yunn-Yi Chen; Jessica Leung; Elisabeth R Garwood; Jessica Gibbs; Nola Hylton; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Quantification of breast tissue index from MR data using fuzzy clustering.

Authors:  C Klifa; J Carballido-Gamio; L Wilmes; A Laprie; C Lobo; E Demicco; M Watkins; J Shepherd; J Gibbs; N Hylton
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

3.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Quantitative Preoperative Breast MR Imaging Features Associated with Recurrence after Treatment.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Brian S Johnston; Averi E Kitsch; Daniel S Hippe; Larissa A Korde; Sara Javid; Janie M Lee; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Incidence of chemotherapy-induced, long-term amenorrhea in patients with breast carcinoma age 40 years and younger after adjuvant anthracycline and taxane.

Authors:  Monica N Fornier; Shanu Modi; Katherine S Panageas; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Breast cancer treatment and ovarian failure: risk factors and emerging genetic determinants.

Authors:  Vered Stearns; Bryan Schneider; N Lynn Henry; Daniel F Hayes; David A Flockhart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Decreased background parenchymal enhancement of the contralateral breast after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with tumor response in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Chao You; Yajia Gu; Wen Peng; Jianwei Li; Xuxia Shen; Guangyu Liu; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  M Müller-Schimpfle; K Ohmenhaüser; P Stoll; K Dietz; C D Claussen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Geraldine J Liao; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Roberta M Strigel; Rhea D Chitalia; Despina Kontos; Linda Moy; Savannah C Partridge; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation.

Authors:  Catherine S Giess; Eren D Yeh; Sughra Raza; Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Taxane-mediated antiangiogenesis in vitro: influence of formulation vehicles and binding proteins.

Authors:  Sylvia S W Ng; William D Figg; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  1 in total

1.  Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response.

Authors:  Alex Anh-Tu Nguyen; Natsuko Onishi; Julia Carmona-Bozo; Wen Li; John Kornak; David C Newitt; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-03-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.