Literature DB >> 34427325

High DNMT1 Is Associated With Worse Local Control in Early-Stage Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Leonie Bruine de Bruin1,2, Martijn J A M Clausen2,3, Lorian Slagter-Menkema1,2, Gertruida H de Bock3, Johannes A Langendijk4, Bert van der Vegt2, Bernard F A M van der Laan1, Ed Schuuring2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Early-stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) has yielded local control rates of 75% after radiotherapy. DNA methylation, in which DNA methyltransferases play an important role, has influence on tumorigenesis. In this study, we investigated the association between the expression of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and local control in early-stage LSCC treated with radiotherapy. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: We analyzed a well-defined homogeneous series of 125 LSCC patients treated with radiotherapy with curative intent. The association of immunohistochemical expression of DNMT1 with local control was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard regression models.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 58 months, 29 local recurrences (23%) were observed. On univariate analysis, worse local control was associated with high DNMT1 expression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-6.01). Also, higher T-stage (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.06-5.80) and positive N-status (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.06-6.47) were associated with worse local control. Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that high DNMT1 (HR 2.81; 95% CI 1.20-6.58) was independently associated with worse local control.
CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between high DNMT1 expression and worse local control in a homogeneous well-defined cohort of early-stage LSCC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy. The association between DNA methylation status as determined by DNMT1 expression and local control suggests that DNMT1 acts as a potential prognostic tumor marker in treatment decision-making in early-stage laryngeal carcinoma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 132:801-805, 2022.
© 2021 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; local control; prognostic marker; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34427325      PMCID: PMC9290472          DOI: 10.1002/lary.29833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   2.970


INTRODUCTION

Approximately 890,000 patients are diagnosed with head and neck cancer annually of which 25% are laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas (LSCCs) worldwide. In the Netherlands, most early‐stage LSCCs are treated with radiotherapy as single modality treatment. The exception is T1a glottic LSCC without involvement of the anterior commissure for which CO2 laser surgery can be an alternative treatment. In other cases, surgery will lead to less optimal laryngeal function. , The local control rate for T1 to T2 laryngeal carcinoma obtained with primary radiotherapy is 75% to 90%, which is comparable with local control rates obtained with primary surgery. Given the high impact of salvage surgery in case of a recurrence, prediction of tumors that are likely to recur after primary radiotherapy may be useful in the selection of the most optimal treatment for the individual patient. A promising biomarker predictive for treatment outcome is DNA methylation. DNA methylation plays an important role in tumorigenesis leading to the epigenetic silencing of the expression of cancer‐related genes involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and DNA repair. , , Therefore, changes in the methylation status of these tumor‐suppressor genes may contribute to carcinogenesis, influence treatment response, and promote cancer progression. Many studies reported on specific methylation markers associated with clinical outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) , , , as well as in other malignancies. , In addition, the overall methylation status of the genome is also associated with clinical progression and tumor development. , , Increased methylation of the CpG islands located near promoter regions of tumor‐suppressor genes and concomitant decreased methylation of the promotor region of specific proliferation‐linked genes as well as intragenic regions gradually increase tumor progression. The DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) proteins DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b play an important role in the methylation process by adding methyl groups to CpG dinucleotides and are involved in both de novo methylation and maintenance of methylation status of the genome. Therefore, expression of DNMTs is considered as a regulator of methylation status and consequently to the chromosomal stability linked to overall gene expression. The expression of DNMTs was associated with DNA hypermethylation and oncogenic activation in a variety of tumors. In several studies on HNSCC and HNSCC cell lines, DNMT1 expression was correlated with aberrant DNA methylation. DNMT1 has also been identified to be a potential prognostic marker in HNSCC. , , , , All these observations suggest a potential role for DNMT1 expression as a prognostic tumor marker in local control in HNSCC and the availability of several DNMT1‐specific (clinically validated) inhibitors may provide new opportunities to improve local control. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the expression of DNMT1 and local control in a well‐defined homogeneous cohort of patients with early‐stage LSCC all treated curatively with definitive radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We constructed an anonymous database covering 1,286 patients diagnosed with laryngeal carcinoma in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery at the University Medical Center Groningen treated between 1990 and 2008. Medical records of all patients were reviewed, and all clinical, histopathological, and follow‐up data of them were collected. For the present study, patients with histologically proven stage T1 or T2 LSCCs, with no distant metastases curatively treated with definitive radiotherapy only and from which formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded pretreatment tumor material was available, were included. The selection resulted in a cohort of 125 patients with sufficient tumor tissue for immunohistochemical staining. This same cohort was reported previously in a study on the expression of DNA‐repair markers pATM, pChk2, and p53 and local control and comprised both glottic and supraglottic LSCCs. , The collection of patient data and tissue samples was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of our hospital. The privacy rights of patients were guaranteed by converting data in an anonymous database.

Treatment

All patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy as reported previously. , In short, in stage T1 tumors, a total dose of 66 Gy, using 2 Gy fractions, five times weekly were given. Stage T2 tumors were generally treated with six fractions weekly to a total dose of 70 Gy within 6 weeks. In the case of elective radiotherapy to the neck nodes, a total dose of 46 Gy was given to the primary planning target volume, with an additional boost of 70 Gy to the primary tumor and pathologic lymph nodes. Patients were clinically followed every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months up to 5 years after completing radiotherapy.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunostaining procedures were performed as reported previously using the mouse monoclonal antibody IMG‐261A against DNMT1 (Imgenex, San Diego, CA) as described. , In short, 4 μm sections were cut and the first and last slides were stained with hematoxylin‐eosine to determine that sufficient neoplastic cells are present. The slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a graded alcohol series. Antigen retrieval was performed using preheated citrate buffer (10 mM citric acid, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) and heated in a microwave oven for 15 minutes at 300 W, and endogenous peroxide was blocked by incubating in 0.3% peroxide solution. After 60 minute incubation with the primary IMG‐261A antibody (1:100 diluted in phosphate‐buffered saline 1%/bovine serum albumin), the secondary antibody EnVision (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was applied for 30 minutes. Slides were developed with diaminobenzidene chromogen solution, followed by hematoxylin counterstaining. As positive control tissues, sections of kidney and placenta were included according to manufacturer recommendations and previous studies. DNMT1 staining was observed in nucleus and cytoplasm. The staining was semiquantitatively scored, independently by two observers and under supervision of a head and neck pathologist. For the observers, tissue samples were nonidentifiable. Only the administrator of the database could link tissue numbers to clinical data. All tumor cells showed cytoplasmic staining that was considered nonspecific. The percentage of tumor nuclei with staining stronger than the cytoplasmic background staining was scored by both observers. The cases with discordant results were discussed until consensus was reached. The cutoff for high/low expressers was based on the median percentage of positive staining in all tumors. Expression of DNMT1 was considered high when ≥80% of the neoplastic cells showed high staining of the nucleus.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23. In all statistical analyses, a P value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Time calculations were performed using the date of diagnosis as starting point and the day of local recurrence or last follow‐up visit as endpoint. Local recurrence was defined as reappearing tumor growth at the primary tumor site after treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess which patient and tumor variables were independently associated with time to local recurrence. Only variables showing a significant relationship with local control in univariate analysis (P < .05) were included in the multivariate Cox regression model. Survival curves were plotted according to the Kaplan‐Meier method for illustration and were compared with log‐rank test.

RESULTS

Expression of DNMT1 was analyzed on pretreatment biopsies of 125 early‐stage squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx. Of these patients, 18 were women and 107 were men, and their age ranged from 33 to 95 years (median age 64 years). Tumors were primary localized in the glottic (70%) or supraglottic (30%) region. Table I shows patient and tumor characteristics.
TABLE I

Patient and Tumor Characteristics of Patients (n = 125).

CharacteristicsNo. of Patients (%)
Age, yr
Median (range)65 (33–95)
Gender
Male107 (86)
Female18 (14)
Sublocation
Glottic87 (70)
Supraglottic38 (30)
T status
T 1 51 (41)
T 2 74 (59)
N status
N 0 111 (89)
N + 14 (11)
Patient and Tumor Characteristics of Patients (n = 125).

Follow‐Up Data

Median follow‐up was 58 months (2–60 months). In total, 29 (23%) of 125 patients developed a local recurrence within 5 years of follow‐up. The median time to local recurrence was 12 months (range 2–46 months). In total, 52 patients died of which 15 died of primary disease.

Correlation Between DNMT1 and Local Control

Almost all tumors (99%) demonstrated areas with DNMT1 expression. In 71 (56%) patients, high nuclear expression was found (see the examples of high and low expression in Figure 1).
Fig 1

Examples of laryngeal tumor biopsies showing high expression (A) and low expression (B) of DNA methyltransferase 1. Original magnification 200×.

Examples of laryngeal tumor biopsies showing high expression (A) and low expression (B) of DNA methyltransferase 1. Original magnification 200×. The 5‐year local control was 87% for patients with low DNMT1 expression versus 69% for patients with high DNMT1 expression. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that high DNMT1 expression was significantly associated with worse local control (hazard ratio [HR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–6.01) (Table II). In addition to DNMT1 expression, higher T‐stage (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.06–5.80) and positive N‐status (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.06–6.47) were associated with worse local control. It appears that smoking is not an important parameter in our series nor have any influence on the observed DNMT1 patterns and clinical outcomes (data not shown). Multivariate Cox regression analysis (Table II) revealed that DNMT1 is an independent predictor for local control. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve illustrated that local control was significantly better in patients with low DNMT1 expression (log‐rank P = .02) (Fig. 2). Stratification of analyses to glottic and supraglottic sublocation showed the same results, but results became insignificant most likely because pooled groups became too small (data not shown).
TABLE II

Patient Characteristics, Tumor Characteristics, and DNMT1 Expression in Relation to Local Recurrence.

No. of Patients With Local Recurrence (%)Univariate HR (95% CI) P Multivariate HR (95% CI) P
Age
<6513 (21)1
≥6516 (25)1.36 (0.66–2.84).41
Gender
Male26 (24)1.53 (0.46–5.07).48
Female3 (17)1
Sublocation
Glottic20 (23)1
Supraglottic9 (24)1.07 (0.49–2.35).87
T status
T 1 7 (14)11
T 2 22 (30)2.48 (1.06–5.80).04* 2.41 (1.00–5.80).05
N status
N 0 23 (21)11
N + 6 (43)2.62 (1.06–6.47).04* 2.03 (0.80–5.12).14
DNMT1 expression
Low7 (13)11
High22 (31)2.57 (1.10–6.01).03* 2.81 (1.20–6.598).02*

Results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis (n = 29).

Signifies statistically significant relation.

CI = confidence interval; DNMT1 = DNA methyltransferase 1; HR = hazard ratio.

Fig 2

Kaplan‐Meier curve for the relation of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) expression with local control.

Patient Characteristics, Tumor Characteristics, and DNMT1 Expression in Relation to Local Recurrence. Results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis (n = 29). Signifies statistically significant relation. CI = confidence interval; DNMT1 = DNA methyltransferase 1; HR = hazard ratio. Kaplan‐Meier curve for the relation of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) expression with local control.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated the association between expression of DNMT1 and local control in a well‐defined homogeneous cohort of early‐stage LSCC patients treated with primary radiotherapy. We found a significant association between high DNMT1 expression and worse local control. Different DNMT1 expression levels have been reported with aberrant DNA methylation in various malignancies and the aberrant methylation levels have been associated with clinical outcome. Interestingly, during carcinogenesis, genome‐wide overall hypomethylation is observed. This global loss of methylation contributes to tumor development through chromosomal instability as a result of changes in chromatin structure, reactivation of transposable elements such as LINE‐1, which are normally silenced by hypermethylation, as well as loss of imprinting, which causes overexpression of genes silenced in normal tissue. Besides genome‐wide hypomethylation, CpG islands tend to become hypermethylated during tumorigenesis, which could lead to the repression of specific tumor suppression genes. These changes are thought to be an important event in tumor progression, therapy response, invasion, and metastasis. , , , DNA methylation levels are maintained by DNMTs of which DNMT3a and DNMT3b facilitate the introduction of new DNA methylation of previously unmethylated CpG sites and DNMT1 maintains concordant DNA methylations status of opposite CpG sites on the different DNA strands. , Consequently, DNA methylation maintains tissue‐specific DNA imprinting during cell division. , Therefore, changes in levels of DNMT1, considered as the regulator of the DNA methylation status of the genome, is an explanation for the observed association with clinical outcome. Positive DNMT1 immunostaining was linked previously to lower rates of treatment response and shorter survival of patients with pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery combined with adjuvant radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation. In another study, higher DNMT1 protein expression was correlated with shorter overall survival time in laryngeal carcinomas treated with surgery. Furthermore, DNMT1 expression was positively correlated with radiation sensitization and longer survival of esophageal cancer patients. In our series of early‐stage LSCCs, all patients showed expression of DNMT1. High expression (≥80% of positive tumor cells) of DNMT1 immunostaining was found in 71 out of 125 (57%) patients, comparable to high expression levels of 47% to 75% found in oral squamous cell carcinomas. , One study performed immunohistochemistry with another anti‐DNMT1 antibody in laryngeal carcinoma and found a percentage of 73% of positive staining (>10% positivity in neoplastic cells was used as cutoff) in agreement with our findings. In our cohort, we found that high expression of DNMT1 was associated with worse local control. Inhibition of DNMT1 expression was reported to re‐express several tumor suppressor genes and decreasing cell proliferation/viability as well as inducing cell apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. DNMT1 has been reported as a molecular target in a multimodality‐resistant phenotype in tumor cells. , Epigenetic drugs such as DNMT1 inhibitors (azacitidine and decitabine) are commonly used in clinical treatment modalities and have been reported to result in DNA hypomethylation. This offers opportunities to investigate the modulation of the radiation sensitivity of tumors. For instance, DNMT1 inhibitors were demonstrated to sensitize HNSCC cell lines to irradiation. These findings suggest that early‐stage LSCC patients with tumors with high DNMT1 expression might benefit from adding DNMT1 inhibitors to radiotherapy. Thus far, no studies have been published that compare treatment combining DNMT1 inhibitors and radiation to DNMT1 levels in early‐stage laryngeal carcinomas. In the last decade, several specific single methylation markers have been associated with malignant disease and clinical outcome. , , , , However, at this moment, only few methylation markers are applied in clinical diagnostics. For example, MGMT gene promoter methylation status is currently a diagnostic test and prognostic biomarker in pediatric and adult patients with glioblastoma. More recent studies suggested that sets of methylation markers in the early detection of cervical cancer , and even methylation array profiling in the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors overall perform better than single methylation markers. The overall methylation status of the genome has also been associated with clinical progression in tumor development but as far as we know not with clinical outcome. Since DNMT1 expression is associated with genomic methylation patterns, our findings support that the genome‐wide methylation status as determined by DNMT1 levels is a stronger prognostic marker than unique single methylation markers.

CONCLUSION

We report on high DNMT1 expression as an independent predictor for worse local control in a homogeneous well‐defined cohort of early‐stage LSCC treated with primary radiotherapy. This association underlines the importance of the genome‐wide DNA methylation status for radiotherapy response. As such DNMT1 expression‐level assessment in pre‐treatment tumor biopsies adds prognostic information, in addition to already used clinical factors as TNM stage and lymph node status, to aid treatment decision‐making in early‐stage laryngeal carcinomas.
  39 in total

1.  Identification and validation of WISP1 as an epigenetic regulator of metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Martijn J A M Clausen; Lieuwe J Melchers; Mirjam F Mastik; Lorian Slagter-Menkema; Harry J M Groen; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Wim van Criekinge; Tim de Meyer; Simon Denil; G Bea A Wisman; Jan L N Roodenburg; Ed Schuuring
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Laryngeal preservation in head and neck cancer: multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Jean Louis Lefebvre
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  An association of DNMT3b protein expression with P16INK4a promoter hypermethylation in non-smoking female lung cancer with human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  Torng-Sen Lin; Huei Lee; Ruei-A Chen; Ming-Lin Ho; Chia-Yu Lin; Ya-Hui Chen; Yi Yu Tsai; Ming-Chih Chou; Ya-Wen Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  A four-gene methylation marker panel as triage test in high-risk human papillomavirus positive patients.

Authors:  J J H Eijsink; Á Lendvai; V Deregowski; H G Klip; G Verpooten; L Dehaspe; G H de Bock; H Hollema; W van Criekinge; E Schuuring; A G J van der Zee; G B A Wisman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  A mouse skin multistage carcinogenesis model reflects the aberrant DNA methylation patterns of human tumors.

Authors:  Mario F Fraga; Michel Herranz; Jesús Espada; Esteban Ballestar; Maria F Paz; Santiago Ropero; Emel Erkek; Onder Bozdogan; Héctor Peinado; Alain Niveleau; Jian-Hua Mao; Alan Balmain; Amparo Cano; Manel Esteller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  MeCP2 and other methyl-CpG binding proteins.

Authors:  Helle Faerk Jørgensen; Adrian Bird
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2002

7.  Overexpression of intrinsic hypoxia markers HIF1alpha and CA-IX predict for local recurrence in stage T1-T2 glottic laryngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  M L Schrijvers; B F A M van der Laan; G H de Bock; W J Pattje; M F Mastik; L Menkema; J A Langendijk; P M Kluin; E Schuuring; J E van der Wal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  High pATM is Associated With Poor Local Control in Supraglottic Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Leonie Bruine de Bruin; Ed Schuuring; Geertruida H de Bock; Lorian Slagter-Menkema; Mirjam F Mastik; Maartje G Noordhuis; Johannes A Langendijk; Philip M Kluin; Bernard F A M van der Laan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  The Roles of Human DNA Methyltransferases and Their Isoforms in Shaping the Epigenome.

Authors:  Hemant Gujar; Daniel J Weisenberger; Gangning Liang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.

Authors:  Christina Fitzmaurice; Degu Abate; Naghmeh Abbasi; Hedayat Abbastabar; Foad Abd-Allah; Omar Abdel-Rahman; Ahmed Abdelalim; Amir Abdoli; Ibrahim Abdollahpour; Abdishakur S M Abdulle; Nebiyu Dereje Abebe; Haftom Niguse Abraha; Laith Jamal Abu-Raddad; Ahmed Abualhasan; Isaac Akinkunmi Adedeji; Shailesh M Advani; Mohsen Afarideh; Mahdi Afshari; Mohammad Aghaali; Dominic Agius; Sutapa Agrawal; Ayat Ahmadi; Elham Ahmadian; Ehsan Ahmadpour; Muktar Beshir Ahmed; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Tomi Akinyemiju; Ziyad Al-Aly; Assim M AlAbdulKader; Fares Alahdab; Tahiya Alam; Genet Melak Alamene; Birhan Tamene T Alemnew; Kefyalew Addis Alene; Cyrus Alinia; Vahid Alipour; Syed Mohamed Aljunid; Fatemeh Allah Bakeshei; Majid Abdulrahman Hamad Almadi; Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Ubai Alsharif; Shirina Alsowaidi; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Erfan Amini; Saeed Amini; Yaw Ampem Amoako; Zohreh Anbari; Nahla Hamed Anber; Catalina Liliana Andrei; Mina Anjomshoa; Fereshteh Ansari; Ansariadi Ansariadi; Seth Christopher Yaw Appiah; Morteza Arab-Zozani; Jalal Arabloo; Zohreh Arefi; Olatunde Aremu; Habtamu Abera Areri; Al Artaman; Hamid Asayesh; Ephrem Tsegay Asfaw; Alebachew Fasil Ashagre; Reza Assadi; Bahar Ataeinia; Hagos Tasew Atalay; Zerihun Ataro; Suleman Atique; Marcel Ausloos; Leticia Avila-Burgos; Euripide F G A Avokpaho; Ashish Awasthi; Nefsu Awoke; Beatriz Paulina Ayala Quintanilla; Martin Amogre Ayanore; Henok Tadesse Ayele; Ebrahim Babaee; Umar Bacha; Alaa Badawi; Mojtaba Bagherzadeh; Eleni Bagli; Senthilkumar Balakrishnan; Abbas Balouchi; Till Winfried Bärnighausen; Robert J Battista; Masoud Behzadifar; Meysam Behzadifar; Bayu Begashaw Bekele; Yared Belete Belay; Yaschilal Muche Belayneh; Kathleen Kim Sachiko Berfield; Adugnaw Berhane; Eduardo Bernabe; Mircea Beuran; Nickhill Bhakta; Krittika Bhattacharyya; Belete Biadgo; Ali Bijani; Muhammad Shahdaat Bin Sayeed; Charles Birungi; Catherine Bisignano; Helen Bitew; Tone Bjørge; Archie Bleyer; Kassawmar Angaw Bogale; Hunduma Amensisa Bojia; Antonio M Borzì; Cristina Bosetti; Ibrahim R Bou-Orm; Hermann Brenner; Jerry D Brewer; Andrey Nikolaevich Briko; Nikolay Ivanovich Briko; Maria Teresa Bustamante-Teixeira; Zahid A Butt; Giulia Carreras; Juan J Carrero; Félix Carvalho; Clara Castro; Franz Castro; Ferrán Catalá-López; Ester Cerin; Yazan Chaiah; Wagaye Fentahun Chanie; Vijay Kumar Chattu; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Neelima Singh Chauhan; Mohammad Chehrazi; Peggy Pei-Chia Chiang; Tesfaye Yitna Chichiabellu; Onyema Greg Chido-Amajuoyi; Odgerel Chimed-Ochir; Jee-Young J Choi; Devasahayam J Christopher; Dinh-Toi Chu; Maria-Magdalena Constantin; Vera M Costa; Emanuele Crocetti; Christopher Stephen Crowe; Maria Paula Curado; Saad M A Dahlawi; Giovanni Damiani; Amira Hamed Darwish; Ahmad Daryani; José das Neves; Feleke Mekonnen Demeke; Asmamaw Bizuneh Demis; Birhanu Wondimeneh Demissie; Gebre Teklemariam Demoz; Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez; Afshin Derakhshani; Kalkidan Solomon Deribe; Rupak Desai; Beruk Berhanu Desalegn; Melaku Desta; Subhojit Dey; Samath Dhamminda Dharmaratne; Meghnath Dhimal; Daniel Diaz; Mesfin Tadese Tadese Dinberu; Shirin Djalalinia; David Teye Doku; Thomas M Drake; Manisha Dubey; Eleonora Dubljanin; Eyasu Ejeta Duken; Hedyeh Ebrahimi; Andem Effiong; Aziz Eftekhari; Iman El Sayed; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Shaimaa I El-Jaafary; Ziad El-Khatib; Demelash Abewa Elemineh; Hajer Elkout; Richard G Ellenbogen; Aisha Elsharkawy; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Daniel Adane Endalew; Aman Yesuf Endries; Babak Eshrati; Ibtihal Fadhil; Vahid Fallah Omrani; Mahbobeh Faramarzi; Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi; Andrea Farioli; Farshad Farzadfar; Netsanet Fentahun; Eduarda Fernandes; Garumma Tolu Feyissa; Irina Filip; Florian Fischer; James L Fisher; Lisa M Force; Masoud Foroutan; Marisa Freitas; Takeshi Fukumoto; Neal D Futran; Silvano Gallus; Fortune Gbetoho Gankpe; Reta Tsegaye Gayesa; Tsegaye Tewelde Gebrehiwot; Gebreamlak Gebremedhn Gebremeskel; Getnet Azeze Gedefaw; Belayneh K Gelaw; Birhanu Geta; Sefonias Getachew; Kebede Embaye Gezae; Mansour Ghafourifard; Alireza Ghajar; Ahmad Ghashghaee; Asadollah Gholamian; Paramjit Singh Gill; Themba T G Ginindza; Alem Girmay; Muluken Gizaw; Ricardo Santiago Gomez; Sameer Vali Gopalani; Giuseppe Gorini; Bárbara Niegia Garcia Goulart; Ayman Grada; Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra; Andre Luiz Sena Guimaraes; Prakash C Gupta; Rahul Gupta; Kishor Hadkhale; Arvin Haj-Mirzaian; Arya Haj-Mirzaian; Randah R Hamadeh; Samer Hamidi; Lolemo Kelbiso Hanfore; Josep Maria Haro; Milad Hasankhani; Amir Hasanzadeh; Hamid Yimam Hassen; Roderick J Hay; Simon I Hay; Andualem Henok; Nathaniel J Henry; Claudiu Herteliu; Hagos D Hidru; Chi Linh Hoang; Michael K Hole; Praveen Hoogar; Nobuyuki Horita; H Dean Hosgood; Mostafa Hosseini; Mehdi Hosseinzadeh; Mihaela Hostiuc; Sorin Hostiuc; Mowafa Househ; Mohammedaman Mama Hussen; Bogdan Ileanu; Milena D Ilic; Kaire Innos; Seyed Sina Naghibi Irvani; Kufre Robert Iseh; Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam; Farhad Islami; Nader Jafari Balalami; Morteza Jafarinia; Leila Jahangiry; Mohammad Ali Jahani; Nader Jahanmehr; Mihajlo Jakovljevic; Spencer L James; Mehdi Javanbakht; Sudha Jayaraman; Sun Ha Jee; Ensiyeh Jenabi; Ravi Prakash Jha; Jost B Jonas; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Tamas Joo; Suresh Banayya Jungari; Mikk Jürisson; Ali Kabir; Farin Kamangar; André Karch; Narges Karimi; Ansar Karimian; Amir Kasaeian; Gebremicheal Gebreslassie Kasahun; Belete Kassa; Tesfaye Dessale Kassa; Mesfin Wudu Kassaw; Anil Kaul; Peter Njenga Keiyoro; Abraham Getachew Kelbore; Amene Abebe Kerbo; Yousef Saleh Khader; Maryam Khalilarjmandi; Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Gulfaraz Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Khaled Khatab; Amir Khater; Maryam Khayamzadeh; Maryam Khazaee-Pool; Salman Khazaei; Abdullah T Khoja; Mohammad Hossein Khosravi; Jagdish Khubchandani; Neda Kianipour; Daniel Kim; Yun Jin Kim; Adnan Kisa; Sezer Kisa; Katarzyna Kissimova-Skarbek; Hamidreza Komaki; Ai Koyanagi; Kristopher J Krohn; Burcu Kucuk Bicer; Nuworza Kugbey; Vivek Kumar; Desmond Kuupiel; Carlo La Vecchia; Deepesh P Lad; Eyasu Alem Lake; Ayenew Molla Lakew; Dharmesh Kumar Lal; Faris Hasan Lami; Qing Lan; Savita Lasrado; Paolo Lauriola; Jeffrey V Lazarus; James Leigh; Cheru Tesema Leshargie; Yu Liao; Miteku Andualem Limenih; Stefan Listl; Alan D Lopez; Platon D Lopukhov; Raimundas Lunevicius; Mohammed Madadin; Sameh Magdeldin; Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek; Azeem Majeed; Afshin Maleki; Reza Malekzadeh; Ali Manafi; Navid Manafi; Wondimu Ayele Manamo; Morteza Mansourian; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani; Saman Maroufizadeh; Santi Martini S Martini; Tivani Phosa Mashamba-Thompson; Benjamin Ballard Massenburg; Motswadi Titus Maswabi; Manu Raj Mathur; Colm McAlinden; Martin McKee; Hailemariam Abiy Alemu Meheretu; Ravi Mehrotra; Varshil Mehta; Toni Meier; Yohannes A Melaku; Gebrekiros Gebremichael Meles; Hagazi Gebre Meles; Addisu Melese; Mulugeta Melku; Peter T N Memiah; Walter Mendoza; Ritesh G Menezes; Shahin Merat; Tuomo J Meretoja; Tomislav Mestrovic; Bartosz Miazgowski; Tomasz Miazgowski; Kebadnew Mulatu M Mihretie; Ted R Miller; Edward J Mills; Seyed Mostafa Mir; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Rashmi Mishra; Babak Moazen; Dara K Mohammad; Karzan Abdulmuhsin Mohammad; Yousef Mohammad; Aso Mohammad Darwesh; Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi; Hiwa Mohammadi; Moslem Mohammadi; Mahdi Mohammadian; Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani; Milad Mohammadoo-Khorasani; Reza Mohammadpourhodki; Ammas Siraj Mohammed; Jemal Abdu Mohammed; Shafiu Mohammed; Farnam Mohebi; Ali H Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Yoshan Moodley; Mahmood Moosazadeh; Maryam Moossavi; Ghobad Moradi; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Farhad Moradpour; Lidia Morawska; Joana Morgado-da-Costa; Naho Morisaki; Shane Douglas Morrison; Abbas Mosapour; Seyyed Meysam Mousavi; Achenef Asmamaw Muche; Oumer Sada S Muhammed; Jonah Musa; Ashraf F Nabhan; Mehdi Naderi; Ahamarshan Jayaraman Nagarajan; Gabriele Nagel; Azin Nahvijou; Gurudatta Naik; Farid Najafi; Luigi Naldi; Hae Sung Nam; Naser Nasiri; Javad Nazari; Ionut Negoi; Subas Neupane; Polly A Newcomb; Haruna Asura Nggada; Josephine W Ngunjiri; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Leila Nikniaz; Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum; Yirga Legesse Nirayo; Molly R Nixon; Chukwudi A Nnaji; Marzieh Nojomi; Shirin Nosratnejad; Malihe Nourollahpour Shiadeh; Mohammed Suleiman Obsa; Richard Ofori-Asenso; Felix Akpojene Ogbo; In-Hwan Oh; Andrew T Olagunju; Tinuke O Olagunju; Mojisola Morenike Oluwasanu; Abidemi E Omonisi; Obinna E Onwujekwe; Anu Mary Oommen; Eyal Oren; Doris D V Ortega-Altamirano; Erika Ota; Stanislav S Otstavnov; Mayowa Ojo Owolabi; Mahesh P A; Jagadish Rao Padubidri; Smita Pakhale; Amir H Pakpour; Adrian Pana; Eun-Kee Park; Hadi Parsian; Tahereh Pashaei; Shanti Patel; Snehal T Patil; Alyssa Pennini; David M Pereira; Cristiano Piccinelli; Julian David Pillay; Majid Pirestani; Farhad Pishgar; Maarten J Postma; Hadi Pourjafar; Farshad Pourmalek; Akram Pourshams; Swayam Prakash; Narayan Prasad; Mostafa Qorbani; Mohammad Rabiee; Navid Rabiee; Amir Radfar; Alireza Rafiei; Fakher Rahim; Mahdi Rahimi; Muhammad Aziz Rahman; Fatemeh Rajati; Saleem M Rana; Samira Raoofi; Goura Kishor Rath; David Laith Rawaf; Salman Rawaf; Robert C Reiner; Andre M N Renzaho; Nima Rezaei; Aziz Rezapour; Ana Isabel Ribeiro; Daniela Ribeiro; Luca Ronfani; Elias Merdassa Roro; Gholamreza Roshandel; Ali Rostami; Ragy Safwat Saad; Parisa Sabbagh; Siamak Sabour; Basema Saddik; Saeid Safiri; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mohammad Reza Salahshoor; Farkhonde Salehi; Hosni Salem; Marwa Rashad Salem; Hamideh Salimzadeh; Joshua A Salomon; Abdallah M Samy; Juan Sanabria; Milena M Santric Milicevic; Benn Sartorius; Arash Sarveazad; Brijesh Sathian; Maheswar Satpathy; Miloje Savic; Monika Sawhney; Mehdi Sayyah; Ione J C Schneider; Ben Schöttker; Mario Sekerija; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Masood Sepehrimanesh; Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Faramarz Shaahmadi; Hosein Shabaninejad; Mohammad Shahbaz; Masood Ali Shaikh; Amir Shamshirian; Morteza Shamsizadeh; Heidar Sharafi; Zeinab Sharafi; Mehdi Sharif; Ali Sharifi; Hamid Sharifi; Rajesh Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Reza Shirkoohi; Sharvari Rahul Shukla; Si Si; Soraya Siabani; Diego Augusto Santos Silva; Dayane Gabriele Alves Silveira; Ambrish Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Solomon Sisay; Freddy Sitas; Eugène Sobngwi; Moslem Soofi; Joan B Soriano; Vasiliki Stathopoulou; Mu'awiyyah Babale Sufiyan; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Takahiro Tabuchi; Ken Takahashi; Omid Reza Tamtaji; Mohammed Rasoul Tarawneh; Segen Gebremeskel Tassew; Parvaneh Taymoori; Arash Tehrani-Banihashemi; Mohamad-Hani Temsah; Omar Temsah; Berhe Etsay Tesfay; Fisaha Haile Tesfay; Manaye Yihune Teshale; Gizachew Assefa Tessema; Subash Thapa; Kenean Getaneh Tlaye; Roman Topor-Madry; Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone; Eugenio Traini; Bach Xuan Tran; Khanh Bao Tran; Afewerki Gebremeskel Tsadik; Irfan Ullah; Olalekan A Uthman; Marco Vacante; Maryam Vaezi; Patricia Varona Pérez; Yousef Veisani; Simone Vidale; Francesco S Violante; Vasily Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Theo Vos; Kia Vosoughi; Giang Thu Vu; Isidora S Vujcic; Henry Wabinga; Tesfahun Mulatu Wachamo; Fasil Shiferaw Wagnew; Yasir Waheed; Fitsum Weldegebreal; Girmay Teklay Weldesamuel; Tissa Wijeratne; Dawit Zewdu Wondafrash; Tewodros Eshete Wonde; Adam Belay Wondmieneh; Hailemariam Mekonnen Workie; Rajaram Yadav; Abbas Yadegar; Ali Yadollahpour; Mehdi Yaseri; Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi; Alex Yeshaneh; Mohammed Ahmed Yimam; Ebrahim M Yimer; Engida Yisma; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Z Younis; Bahman Yousefi; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Chuanhua Yu; Erfan Zabeh; Vesna Zadnik; Telma Zahirian Moghadam; Zoubida Zaidi; Mohammad Zamani; Hamed Zandian; Alireza Zangeneh; Leila Zaki; Kazem Zendehdel; Zerihun Menlkalew Zenebe; Taye Abuhay Zewale; Arash Ziapour; Sanjay Zodpey; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.