| Literature DB >> 34427249 |
Rashmi Krishnamurthy1, Sirisha Senthil1, Nikhil Choudhari1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report our initial experience on the outcomes of phacoemulsification in combination with goniotomy using the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) in eyes with advanced open-angle glaucoma (OAG).Entities:
Keywords: Goniotomy; Indian eyes; Kahook Dual blade; intraocular pressure; open-angle glaucoma
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34427249 PMCID: PMC8544104 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2999_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1Kahook Dual Blade design: sharp tip - blue circle, ramp - yellow star, and dual blades - yellow dotted double arrow
Figure 2Steps of KDB goniotomy (a)Visualization of trabecular meshwork (yellow arrow) and angle with the help of goniotomy lens; (b) introduction of KDB blade (blue arrow) up to the opposite angle through the 2.8 mm clear corneal incision; (c) starting point of goniotomy (point 1); (d) end point of goniotomy (point 2); (e) blood reflux (red arrow) from Schlemm’s canal; (f) removal of residual TM strip (black arrow) with Utrata’s forceps]
Baseline demographic data of 9 patients
| Median (interquartile range) | Range | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years | - | 66 (61, 70) | 55-72 |
| Gender | - | - | |
| Male | 7 (78%) | ||
| Female | 2 (22%) | ||
| Eye | - | - | |
| RE | 1 (11%) | ||
| LE | 8 (89%) | ||
| Glaucoma type | - | - | |
| POAG | 3 (33%) | ||
| PXFG | 6 (67%) | ||
| LogMAR visual acuity | - | 0.4 (0.2, 1.5) | 0.1-2 |
| Baseline IOP (mm Hg) | - | 20 (20,26) | 16-42 |
| Pre-op number of AGM | - | 2 (2, 3) | 1-3 |
| Preop IOP with AGM (mmHg) | - | 16 (16,17) | 14-26 |
| Cup-disc ratio | - | 0.9 (0.9,0.9) | 0.7-0.9 |
| Mean deviation on SAP in mean±standard deviation | -23.04±6.29 | -15.21 to -31.78 |
n=number, RE=Right eye, LE=Left eye, POAG=Primary open angle glaucoma, PXFG=Pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma, LogMAR=Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution, IOP=intraocular pressure, AGM=antiglaucoma medication
AGM used and IOP at each time point
| Number of AGM Median (interquartile range) | IOP (mmHg) | IOP Range (mmHg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 2 (2,3) | - | 20 (20,26) | 16-42 | - |
| Day 1 | 1 (1,1) | 0.007 | 13 (12,15) | 8-22 | 0.01 |
| Week 1 | 1 (0,1) | 0.0007 | 15 (14,17) | 10-19 | 0.008 |
| Month 1 | 1 (0,1) | 0.0002 | 13 (12,17) | 8-18 | 0.001 |
| Month 3 | 1 (0,1) | 0.0005 | 15 (13,15) | 10-16 | 0.02 |
| Month 6 | 1 (0,1) | 0.002 | 14 (12,15) | 10-17 | 0.02 |
AGM=antiglaucoma medication, IOP=intraocular pressure
Incidence of adverse events
| Adverse event | Number of eyes (%) | Resolution time |
|---|---|---|
| Corneal edema | 4 | 1 week |
| Intraocular pressure spikes (>=22 mm Hg) | 2 | 1 week |
| Intra-op hyphema | 1 | 1 day |
Comparison with other studies that included *severe glaucoma and had 6 months of follow-up
| Study design ( | Mean reduction of AGM ( | Mean reduction of IOP (mmHg) (%) | Complication apart from self-limiting hyphema persisting >1 month | Resurgery % ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hirabayashi | 1.2 | 2.1±1.8 | 7.1% (CME | 7.1% (3) (-one case of MicroPulse laser trabeculoplasty - one case of Xen® gel stent, and -one case of Ahmed valve implantation) |
| Salinas | 1.2 | 4.5±2.6 (23.9%) | 2 Corneal edema 7 IOP spike >10 mmHg from baseline 1 Vitreous Hmg | 1.88% (1) (One case of glaucoma drainage device) |
| Greenwood | 0.7 | 4.6±2.6 26% | 2 IOP spike (2.8%) 1 | Not mentioned |
| Our study | 1.6 | 3.8±2.5 | 4 Corneal edema 2 IOP spike (seen on day 1 and All resolved in 1 week) | Nil |
IOP=intraocular pressure, n=number, AGM=antiglaucoma medication, CME=cystoid macular edema, ERM=epiretinal membrane, Hmg=hemorrhage