| Literature DB >> 34427225 |
Rakesh Panyala1, Pradeep Sharma2, Ramanjit Sihota3, Rohit Saxena3, Kameshwar Prasad3, Swati Phuljhele3, Sneha Gurrala4, Karthika Bhaskaran3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The study of papilledema with a novel noninvasive technique such as spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) provides minute and detailed cross-sectional changes thus giving an insight into the application of biomechanical principles and pathophysiology of disc edema.Entities:
Keywords: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension; RNFL thickness; RPE/BM angle; papilledema; papillitis; spectral domain OCT
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34427225 PMCID: PMC8544041 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3269_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) 5 line raster scan image of papilledema patient showing positive angulation both on temporal and nasal sides. Blue line is the tangential line and orange line is along with the deviated retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch’s membrane (RPE/BM)
Comparison of Avg. RNFL thickness and RPE/BM angle among Papilledema, Papillitis and Controls
| Parameters | Controls | Papilledema | Papillitis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| Baseline | 1 month | 2 months | 3 months | 6 months | baseline | 1 month | ||
| Avg. retinal nerve fiber layer thickness(µm) | 95.5±28.19 | 167.29±67.03 | 121.15±68.47 | 113.87±37.56 | 103.63±29.79 | 97.34±29.74 | 141.64±55.52 | 115.17±37.60 |
| <0.001 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 0.077 | 0.08 | <0.001 | 0.02 | ||
| RPE/BM angle (T) (degrees) | −2.75±2.24 | 7.16±2.42 | 5.11±1.64 | 3.92±1.22 | 3.24±1.24 | −1.24±1.02 | −2.08±3.39 | −2.25±2.25 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.019 | 0.13 | 0.089 | 0.09 | ||
| RPE/BM angle (N) (degrees) | −1.22±3.12 | 8.11±3.13 | 5.21±1.85 | 4.32±1.31 | 3.56±1.76 | −0.43±0.32 | −1.04±3.27 | −1.32±3.12 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.022 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.08 | ||
T=temporal, N=nasal. The above table illustrates the parameters namely average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and RPE/BM angle (temporal and nasal side) in cases of papilledema, papillitis, and controls. The P value is calculated in comparison with controls and it was inferred that there was no significant difference in RPE/BM angle in papillitis patients and in cases of papilledema, average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness normalized at 3 months of follow-up whereas RPE/BM angle (nasal and temporal) was normalized at 6 months of follow-up. RPE/BM=retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch’s membrane
RPE/BM angle at 1-month follow-up in cases of papilledema and papillitis
| Parameters | Papilledema | Papillitis |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RPE/BM angle (T) (degrees) | |||
| Baseline | 7.16±2.42 | −2.08±3.39 | <0.001 |
| 1 month | 5.11±1.64 | −2.25±2.25 | <0.001 |
| RPE/BM angle (N) (degrees) | |||
| Baseline | 8.11±3.13 | −1.04±3.27 | <0.001 |
| 1 month | 5.21±1.85 | −1.32±3.12 | <0.001 |
T=temporal, N=nasal. The above table illustrates the RPE/BM angle [temporal and nasal side] at 1-month follow-up in cases of papilledema and papillitis. There is a significant difference noted between the two groups both in the temporal and nasal baseline RPE/BM angle which persisted at 1-month follow-up
Figure 2Optic disc images and SD-OCT 5 line raster scan image of Papilledema showing positive RPE/BM angle at baseline (a and A), at 1 month (b and B) and at 6 months (c and C) follow-up. Blue line is the tangential line and orange line is along with the deviated RPE/BM
Figure 3Optic disc image of papillitis at (a) baseline and at (b) 1-month follow-up. SD-OCT 5 line raster scan image of (c) Papillitis at baseline (d) papillitis patient at 1-month follow-up (e) Early Papilledema showing positive RPE/BM angle (f) OCT image in normal control. Blue line is the tangential line and orange line is along with the deviated RPE/BM
Sensitivity and Specificity of RPE/BM angle in Papilledema
| Temporal RPE/BM angle, taking cut-off as 5° | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Condition | Papilledema | Not papilledema | Total |
| Angle positive | 29 (TP) | 1 (FP) | 30 |
| Angle negative | 1 (FN) | 109 (TN) | 110 |
|
| |||
| Sensitivity = (true positive/diseased) × 100 = (29/30) × 100=96.66%. Specificity = (true negative/not diseased) × 100 = (109/110) × 100=99.09% | |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Angle positive | 29 (TP) | 1 (FP) | 30 |
| Angle negative | 1 (FN) | 109 (TN) | 110 |
Sensitivity = (true positive/diseased) × 100 = (27/30) × 100=96.66%. Specificity = (true negative/not diseased) × 100 = (85/95) × 100=99.09%. To detect papilledema, OCT measurement of RPE/BM angle has sensitivity of 96.66% and specificity of 99.09% on both nasal and temporal side