| Literature DB >> 34426717 |
Sohail Saif1, Ramesh Saha2, Suparna Biswas1.
Abstract
India's health infrastructure is under pressure since the daily COVID-19 cases have crossed the milestone of 4 Lakhs cases per day which surpass the previous years' peak. Patients with mild symptoms have been advised for home treatment since most of the hospitals are running out of bed. In this situation delivering healthcare to people has become revolutionizing due to the rapid advancement of embedded systems, communication, and informatics technologies. Integration of different health sensors, handheld devices, and internet can be a great potential for significant improvement of the quality of remote healthcare. This paper discusses the use of MySignals HW shield which is a hardware development platform for medical devices to build e-health monitoring system. Wearable health monitoring system prototype has been developed in this work. To conduct experiments, health vitals such as body temperature, ECG, oxygen saturation level, and pulse rate from 5 volunteers have been measured, collected, and stored in a cloud database using the system prototype. To evaluate the performance of the prototype, transmission delay has been recorded in both wired (Ethernet) and wireless (Wi-Fi) communication modes. It is observed that it takes 2.71 ms and 5.18 ms of time to collect and store the health vitals to the cloud database in wired and wireless mode respectively. Comparing the collected health vitals with the normal range of health vitals, no abnormality is found in all volunteer's health. Finally, a framework for contactless monitoring of COVID-affected patients is proposed. Contactless monitoring of health vitals can reduce the chance of community spread.Entities:
Keywords: Arduino; COVID 19; Health monitoring; IoT; MySignals; Wearable sensor; Wi-Fi
Year: 2021 PMID: 34426717 PMCID: PMC8372688 DOI: 10.1007/s11277-021-08963-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wirel Pers Commun ISSN: 0929-6212 Impact factor: 1.671
Fig. 1Traditional architecture of body sensor based e-healthcare
Fig. 2MySignals HW and biomedical sensors
Technical specifications of MySignals HW shield
| Description | Values |
|---|---|
| Processor | Atmega 328 (Arduino UNO) |
| RAM | 2 K |
| Flash memory | 32 K |
| UART sockets | 1 (multiplexed) |
| Radios on board | BLE, WiFi |
| Other supported radios | BT, ZigBee, 4G / 3G / GPRS |
| Communication mode | IP TCP/UDP |
Comparative summary of related works
| Author, year | Prototype/framework | Components used | Communication technology | Mobile application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hosseinzadeh et al., 2020 [ | Elderly health monitoring | Heart rate, respiration rate oxygen saturation level, blood pressure, body temperature | Internet | NA |
| Attaoui et al., 2020 [ | IoT based telemonitoring | ECG sensor AD8232 and Arduino | Internet | No |
| Nayyar et al., 2019 [ | IoMT based prototype for patient health monitoring | Arduino mega 2560, wifi module ESP8266,Body temperature sensor DS18B20, Oximetry sensor, Pulse Sensor, LCD | Internet, Wi-Fi | No |
| Leu et al., 2018 [ | Smart phone and wearable sensors based real-time health monitoring | Smart Phone and wearable sensor like Body Temperature, ECG, Heart Rate, Blood Glucose etc. | Internet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Yes |
| Almarashdeh et al., 2018 [ | Intelligent Elderly health care (EHC) system | Temperature Sensor, Blood pressure, and Heart Beat rate, PDA | Internet, LAN | No |
| Wan et al., 2018 [ | IoT based Remote health monitoring | ECG, EMG, EEG, blood pressure, body temperature, pulse oximeter, blood glucose, LCD, Smart phone, Arduino | Internet, Wi-Fi, RFID | No |
| Park et al., 2017 [ | Elderly people monitoring | Blood pressure, body temperature, pulse rate, blood sugar level, SPO2, motion tracking | Internet | No |
| Faezipour, and Abuzneid, 2020 [ | COVID-19 patient monitoring | Smart Phone, embedded sensor like camera, microphone, fingerprint etc | Internet | Internet |
| Karmore et al., 2020 [ | COVID-19 patient monitoring | IR sensors, autonomous navigation, camera module, health Sensor kit, CT for Chest and blood sample collection kit | Internet | Internet |
Fig. 3Architecture of the proposed prototype
Technical specification of the cloud server
| Description | Values |
|---|---|
| Service | Amazon EC2 |
| No. of vCPU | 01 |
| Processor | Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2676 v3 @ 2.40 GHz |
| RAM | 1 GB |
| Storage | 30 GB (SSD) |
| OS | Ubuntu 18.04 |
| Web server | Apache 2.4.29 |
| Database server | MySQL |
Fig. 4Experimental setup for health vital collection
Fig. 5End-to-End delay for wired connection
Fig. 6End-to-end delay for wireless connection
Comparison with other recent similar works
| Author, Year | No. of sensor nodes | End-to-end delay (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| Khan et al. [ | 10 | 130 |
| Murtaza and Ali [ | 80 | 70 |
| Ullah et al. [ | 14 | 160 |
| Proposed | 03 | 2.71 |
Sample record set of the health data collected through the sensors
| Elapsed time | Temperature | Pulse | SPO2 | ECG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volunteer—1 | 0:00.000 | 99.2 | 72 | 95 | − 0.03 |
| Age—28 | 0:00.002 | 99.2 | 72 | 96 | − 0.035 |
| Gender—Male | 0:00.004 | 99.2 | 73 | 96 | − 0.04 |
| Height—186 cm | 0:00.006 | 99.1 | 70 | 95 | − 0.04 |
| Weight—72 kg | 0:00.008 | 99.2 | 72 | 99 | − 0.035 |
| Volunteer—2 | 0:00.000 | 99.1 | 75 | 99 | − 0.055 |
| Age—26 | 0:00.002 | 98.9 | 74 | 97 | − 0.05 |
| Gender—Male | 0:00.004 | 98.9 | 75 | 97 | − 0.05 |
| Height—179 cm | 0:00.006 | 98.5 | 74 | 98 | − 0.05 |
| Weight—65 kg | 0:00.008 | 98.6 | 74 | 97 | − 0.05 |
| Volunteer—3 | 0:00.000 | 98.1 | 75 | 96 | 0.0115 |
| Age—31 | 0:00.002 | 98.3 | 74 | 95 | 0.0115 |
| Gender—Male | 0:00.004 | 98.2 | 74 | 95 | 0.12 |
| Height—167 cm | 0:00.006 | 98 | 73 | 95 | 0.12 |
| Weight—62 kg | 0:00.008 | 98 | 72 | 96 | 0.125 |
Fig. 7ECG signal for 10 s time window
Normal range of ECG features
| Parameters | Normal values (seconds) |
|---|---|
| RR | 0.6–1 |
| PR | 0.12–0.20 |
| QT | 0.32–0.44 |
| QRS | < 0.12 |
Fig. 8Portion of the ECG signal
Manually measured and sensor measured pulse rate
| Volunteer | Pulse rate (sensor) | Pulse rate (manual) | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volunteer-1 | 74 | 68 | 8.10 |
| Volunteer-2 | 79 | 65 | 17.72 |
| Volunteer-3 | 71 | 68 | 4.22 |
| Volunteer-4 | 62 | 69 | 11.29 |
| Volunteer-5 | 64 | 69 | 7.81 |
Fig. 9Proposed framework for COVID patient monitoring
Fig. 10MySignals HW device based framework for health vitals monitoring of COVID patients
Clinical severity and assessment parameters
| Condition | Oxygen saturation (SPO2) | Body temperature (BT) | Respiratory rate (RR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | < 94% (range 90–94%) | ≥ 100.4 °F | ≥ 24 bpm |
| Critical | < 90% | ≥ 101 °F | > 30 bpm |
Fig. 11Threshold based classification strategy