| Literature DB >> 34425841 |
Rui Bai1, Jianfeng Liu2, Jiao Zhang3, Jinmiao Shi4, Zhigeng Jin1, Yi Li1, Xiaoyu Ding4, Xiaoming Zhu4, Chao Yuan4, Bingshui Xiu4, Huiliang Liu5, Zengqiang Yuan6, Zhiqiang Liu7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The niche of tissue development in vivo involves the growth matrix, biophysical cues and cell-cell interactions. Although natural extracellular matrixes may provide good supporting for seeding cells in vitro, it is evitable to destroy biophysical cues during decellularization. Reconstructing the bioactivities of extracellular matrix-based scaffolds is essential for their usage in tissue repair.Entities:
Keywords: Bioactive scaffolds; Extracellular matrixes; Hybrid hydrogel; Regenerative medicine; Single-wall carbon nanotubes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34425841 PMCID: PMC8381546 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00993-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Scheme 1Regulation of SWCNT-ECM hybrid hydrogels on seeding cell fate and the underlying mechanism
Fig. 1Preparation and characterization of HHs. a The procedure of preparing decellularized heart ECM; b TEM observation of SWCNT and HH solution; c the proposed scheme of SWCNT dispersed in HH solution through interacting with ECM; d gelation of ECM hydrogel and HH at 37 ℃; e the electrical conductivities of HHs containing different concentration of SWCNTs; f SEM observing the surface morphology of HH; g adhesion and extension of cardiomyocytes on HH-coated substrate
Fig. 2Effects of HH on cardiomyocytes and the underlying mechanism. a The proposed mechanism of HH regulating cardiomyocytes through integrin β1-related pathway; b immunostaining of cardiomyocytes growing on HH using anti-integrin β1 antibody; c detection of signal molecules downstream integrin β1 with western blotting; d western blotting of cardiac markers in cells growing on HH; f imaging of calcium transient using Fluo-4 AM; g Intracellular calcium ion current of cardiomyocytes growing on HH
Fig. 3The adhesion, survival and differentiation of BADSCs on HHs. a The morphology of BADSCs on HHs; b, the spreading area of BADSCs on HHs; c–e, thermography of cardiac genes in cells growing on HH-coated substrate; f cardiac differentiation of BADSCs on HH-coated substrate; g Intracellular calcium ion current of BADSC-derived cardiomyocytes growing on HH-coated substrate; h western blotting detecting the expression of cardiac markers in BADSCs growing on HH-coated substrate; i the prolifieration of BADSCs on HH-coated substrate by Alamar Blue Assays.(*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 4HH protects BADSCs against anoikis in vitro and in vivo a HH promoted the adhesion of BADSCs in vitro against ROS (H2O2 was used to provide ROS); b, c HH protected BADSCs in vitro against ROS after adhesion; d schematic illustrating the protection of HH on BADSCs against ROS; e quantitative analysis of adhered cells on different substrate under treatment of 100 µM H2O2 for 6 h. H2O2 was added immediately after cell seeding; f quantitative analysis of adhered cells on different substrate under treatment of 100 µM H2O2 for 6 h. H2O2 was added after cell adhesion (12 h after cell seeding); g analysis of cell adhesion and extension under treatment of 500 µM H2O2 for 6 h. H2O2 was added after cell adhesion (12 h after cell seeding); h In situ retention of BADSCs after intramyocardial injection in PBS and in HH; h, schematic illustrating the mechanism of cell retention in situ after delivery in HH; i Quantitative analysis of cell retention in recipient
Fig. 5Structural and functional analysis of ischemic hearts. a PET/CT imaging detecting the infarct size of ischemic hearts in living animals; b echocardiogram detecting the heart function. The functional parameters, LVEF, LVFS, LVEDD and LVESD were acquired; c Masson trichrome staining demonstrated the morphology and structure of infarct hearts; d Comparison of infarct size and left-ventricle wall thickness of ischemic hearts receiving different treatment; e the fibrosis of infarct area was visualized after Masson trichrome staining and recognized using Image Pro Plus software; f myocardial fibrosis was statistically analyzed among different groups
Fig. 6In situ differentiation of BADSCs after intramyocardial delivery in HH. a Engraftment and cardiomyogenic differentiation of BADSCs in recipient myocardium after delivery in HH; b engraftment and cardiomyogenic differentiation of BADSCs in recipient myocardium after delivery in PBS; c the ratio of engrafted BADSCs at different stages of differentiation; d–f quantitative analysis of engrafted BADSCs at different stages of differentiation. UD indicates undifferentiated; UM indicates unmatured; RM indicates relatively mature