| Literature DB >> 34425838 |
Daniel Bourquain1, Livia Schrick2, Bernd Karsten Tischer3, Klaus Osterrieder3,4, Lars Schaade2, Andreas Nitsche2.
Abstract
Zoonotic orthopoxvirus infections continue to represent a threat to human health. The disease caused by distinct orthopoxviruses differs in terms of symptoms and severity, which may be explained by the unique repertoire of virus factors that modulate the host's immune response and cellular machinery. We report here on the construction of recombinant cowpox viruses (CPXV) which either lack the host range factor p28 completely or express truncated variants of p28. We show that p28 is essential for CPXV replication in macrophages of human or mouse origin and that the C-terminal RING finger domain of p28 is necessary to allow CPXV replication in macrophages.Entities:
Keywords: Cowpox virus; Host range; Orthopoxvirus; RING finger; p28
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34425838 PMCID: PMC8381512 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-021-01640-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Fig. 1CPXV-∆p28 replication in different cell lines. Shown are ∆cT values (48 h p.i.) as a measure of viral DNA replication in cells infected (MoI = 0.1) with the p28 knockout virus CPXV-∆p28, the corresponding revertant virus and wild-type CPXV (n = 2). ∆cT values were obtained via normalization to expression of the cellular MYC gene. All cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and routinely screened for mycoplasma contamination. THP-1 cells were stimulated with PMA before infection. Statistics: two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test
Fig. 2CPXV-∆p28, CPXV-p28(1-184) and CPXV-p28∆RING replication kinetics. The replication of CPXV in the Rat-2 fibroblast cells and J774A.1 mouse macrophages was analysed via qPCR and plaque assay (n = 2). Shown are ∆cT values as a measure of viral DNA replication in CPXV-infected (MoI = 0.1) a Rat-2 and c J774A.1 cells or infectious particles (pfu/ml) in the supernatant of b Rat-2 or d J774A.1 cells infected with the p28 mutant viruses CPXV-∆p28, CPXV-p28(1-184) and CPXV-p28∆RING. ∆cT values were obtained via normalization to expression of the cellular MYC gene. Statistics: two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Asterisks showing significance of CPXVΔp28 vs. WT/CPXV p28(1-184) vs. WT/CPXVp28ΔRING vs. WT)
Fig. 3CPXV replication in primary macrophages. The replication of a CPXV-∆p28, CPXV-p28(1-184) in primary peritoneal rat macrophages and b of CPXV-∆p28 in human PBMC-derived GM-CSF-differentiated macrophages was analysed via quantification of viral genome replication in cell lysates (n = 2). Primary rat macrophages were isolated from the peritoneum of 3-month-old Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus). PBMCs were isolated from fresh human buffy coat (acquired from DRK Blutspendedienst Ost) via Ficoll-Paque density gradient cell separation. Isolation of CD14+ monocytes was done via MACS separation using CD14+ MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec). For differentiation into macrophages, 100 ng/ml GM-CSF was added to the medium. Cells were infected with an MoI of 0.1 and viral genome copies in cell lysates were quantified via qPCR. Shown are fold-change values obtained via the ∆∆cT method after normalization of cT values to MYC gene expression. Statistics: a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test, b unpaired t-test