Literature DB >> 34425755

Induction of amylase and protease as antibiofilm agents by starch, casein, and yeast extract in Arthrobacter sp. CW01.

Jeffrine Solihin1, Diana Elizabeth Waturangi2, Tresnawati Purwadaria1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In unfavourable environment, such as nutrient limitation, some bacteria encased themselves into a three dimensional polymer matrix called biofilm. The majority of microbial infections in human are biofilm related, including chronic lung, wound, and ear infections. The matrix of biofilm which consists of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) causes bacterial colonization on medical implanted device in patients, such as catheter and lead to patient's death. Biofilm infections are harder to treat due to increasing antibiotic resistance compared to planktonic microbial cells and escalating the antibiotic concentration may result into in vivo toxicity for the patients. Special compounds which are non-microbicidal that could inhibit or destroy biofilm formation are called antibiofilm compounds, for example enzymes, anti-quorum sensing, and anti-adhesins. Arthrobacter sp. CW01 produced antibiofilm compound known as amylase. This time our preliminary study proved that the antibiofilm compound was not only amylase, but also protease. Therefore, this research aimed to optimize the production of antibiofilm agents using amylase and protease inducing media. The five types of production media used in this research were brain heart infusion (BHI) (Oxoid), BHI with starch (BHIS), casein with starch (CS), yeast extract with starch (YS), and casein-yeast extract with starch (CYS). Biofilm eradication and inhibition activities were assayed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27,853) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25,923).
RESULTS: The results showed that different production media influenced the antibiofilm activity. Addition of starch, casein and yeast extract increased the production of amylase and protease significantly. Higher amylase activity would gradually increase the antibiofilm activity until it reached the certain optimum point. It was shown that crude extracts which contained amylase only (BHI, BHIS and YS) had the optimum eradication activity against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilm around 60-70 %. Meanwhile, CS and CYS crude extracts which contained both amylase and protease increased the biofilm eradication activity against both pathogens, which were around 70-90 %.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the combination of amylase and protease was more effective as antibiofilm agents against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus rather than amylase only.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrobacter; P. aeruginosa; S. aureus; amylase; antibiofilm; casein; protease; starch; yeast extract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34425755      PMCID: PMC8381481          DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02294-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Microbiol        ISSN: 1471-2180            Impact factor:   3.605


  20 in total

Review 1.  The biofilm matrix.

Authors:  Hans-Curt Flemming; Jost Wingender
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Characterization of an endoserine protease secreted by Arthrobacter aureus.

Authors:  V Michotey; C Blanco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Antibiofilm activity of α-amylase from Bacillus subtilis S8-18 against biofilm forming human bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Balu Jancy Kalpana; Subramonian Aarthy; Shunmugiah Karutha Pandian
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.926

4.  Marine bacterial isolates inhibit biofilm formation and disrupt mature biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1.

Authors:  Chari Nithya; Mansur Farzana Begum; Shunmugiah Karutha Pandian
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Control of glucose- and NaCl-induced biofilm formation by rbf in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yong Lim; Malabendu Jana; Thanh T Luong; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  Molecular basis of in vivo biofilm formation by bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Hwang-Soo Joo; Michael Otto
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2012-12-21

7.  Viability of Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 in Nutrient Broth, Luria-Bertani Broth and Brain Heart Infusion over 11 Weeks.

Authors:  Samuel Xin Zher Low; Zhen Qin Aw; Bryan Zong Lin Loo; Kun Cheng Lee; Jack Si Hao Oon; Chin How Lee; Maurice Han Tong Ling
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2013-02-01

8.  Concomitant production of detergent compatible enzymes by Bacillus flexus XJU-1.

Authors:  Francois N Niyonzima; Sunil S More
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 9.  The formation of biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a review of the natural and synthetic compounds interfering with control mechanisms.

Authors:  Tsiry Rasamiravaka; Quentin Labtani; Pierre Duez; Mondher El Jaziri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Anti-biofilm performance of three natural products against initial bacterial attachment.

Authors:  Maria Salta; Julian A Wharton; Simon P Dennington; Paul Stoodley; Keith R Stokes
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  1 in total

1.  Combined Anti-Biofilm Enzymes Strengthen the Eradicate Effect of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Biofilm: Mechanism on cpsA-J Expression and Application on Different Carriers.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Ruyue Dong; Lei Ma; Yilin Qian; Zunying Liu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.