Francisco Villegas-Alzate1, Diego José Caycedo-García2, Ricardo Malaver-Acero3, Sirsa Aleyda Hidalgo-Ibarra4, Víctor A Cardona5, José Daniel Villegas-Mesa6. 1. Departamento de cirugía plástica, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Calle 4B N°36-00, Cali, Colombia. francisco.villegas@correounivalle.edu.co. 2. Jefe de servicio de cirugía plástica, Universidad del Valle, 3 piso hospital universitario del Valle, Cali, Colombia. 3. Facultad de medicina veterinaria y zootecnia, Universidad San Martin Cali Colombia, Carrera 122 #23-395 del, Vía Cali - Puerto Tejada, Cali, Cauca, Colombia. 4. Docente Universidad Santiago de Cali, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Calle 5 # 62-00, Cali, Colombia. 5. Universidad Libre, Cra 109 # 22-00, Cali, Colombia. 6. Escuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Calle 78b No 72a-109, Medellín, Colombia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: TULUA, a transverse plication lipoabdominoplasty, which excludes elevation of the supraumbilical flap and includes a skin graft neoumbilicoplasty, claims greater safety and better results. An animal study was designed to compare it, with two current techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three matched groups of 12 rats had combined liposuction and abdominoplasty. Liposuction was extensive and unrestricted. Groups 1 and 2 had vertical plication and transposition umbilicoplasty, and group 3 had transverse plication and neoumbilicoplasty. Flap elevation in the epigastrium was wide to costal margins in group 1, limited to a tunnel in group 2, and no dissection in group 3. The animals were observed for 21 days and then euthanized. Intraoperative, postoperative, and postmortem variables and findings were measured and analyzed to find differences between groups. RESULTS: Transverse lipoabdominoplasty demonstrated a wider wall plication area, as well as a decrease in tension to close the wound, causing the horizontal scar to remain in a low position. In vertical plication lipoabdominoplasty groups, flap necrosis and seromas were more frequent, and the umbilical position descended due to secondary healing and scar contraction. The scar's scores were better in the transverse group and were confirmed when evaluated by external observers.In postmortem examination, horizontal plication presented less widening; perforator vessels were preserved when surgical undermining of the upper abdomen was not performed, and there were fewer seromas. CONCLUSION: In a rat model, TULUA demonstrates superior results and a decrease in complications when compared to lipoabdominoplasties with vertical plication and wide or tunneled dissection in the upper abdomen. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
BACKGROUND: TULUA, a transverse plication lipoabdominoplasty, which excludes elevation of the supraumbilical flap and includes a skin graft neoumbilicoplasty, claims greater safety and better results. An animal study was designed to compare it, with two current techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three matched groups of 12 rats had combined liposuction and abdominoplasty. Liposuction was extensive and unrestricted. Groups 1 and 2 had vertical plication and transposition umbilicoplasty, and group 3 had transverse plication and neoumbilicoplasty. Flap elevation in the epigastrium was wide to costal margins in group 1, limited to a tunnel in group 2, and no dissection in group 3. The animals were observed for 21 days and then euthanized. Intraoperative, postoperative, and postmortem variables and findings were measured and analyzed to find differences between groups. RESULTS: Transverse lipoabdominoplasty demonstrated a wider wall plication area, as well as a decrease in tension to close the wound, causing the horizontal scar to remain in a low position. In vertical plication lipoabdominoplasty groups, flap necrosis and seromas were more frequent, and the umbilical position descended due to secondary healing and scar contraction. The scar's scores were better in the transverse group and were confirmed when evaluated by external observers.In postmortem examination, horizontal plication presented less widening; perforator vessels were preserved when surgical undermining of the upper abdomen was not performed, and there were fewer seromas. CONCLUSION: In a rat model, TULUA demonstrates superior results and a decrease in complications when compared to lipoabdominoplasties with vertical plication and wide or tunneled dissection in the upper abdomen. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Authors: Heinrich M Schubert; Matthias Hohlrieder; Johannes W Buchegger; Achim F Brodbeck; Martina Hager; Robert F Zimmermann; Thomas M Moser Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Martina Mayr; Charlotte Holm; Eugen Höfter; Andreas Becker; Ulrich Pfeiffer; Wolfgang Mühlbauer Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Naveen M Krishnan; Benjamin J Brown; Steven P Davison; Neil Mauskar; Matthew Mino; Marion H Jordan; Jeffrey W Shupp Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2016-07-13