Literature DB >> 34423161

Prophylactic colectomy for children with familial adenomatous polyposis: resource utilization and outcomes for open and laparoscopic surgery.

Anthony Ferrantella1, Rebecca A Saberi1, Brent A Willobee1, Hallie J Quiroz1, Amber H Langshaw2, Samir Pandya3, Chad M Thorson1, Juan E Sola1, Eduardo A Perez1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic approach for the surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has become increasingly common for pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and resource utilization between open and laparoscopic surgery for prophylactic colectomy in children with FAP.
METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database (2009 and 2012) was analyzed for children (age ≤20 years) with FAP that underwent prophylactic total colectomy or proctocolectomy. Patient demographics, treating hospital characteristics, hospital charges, and short-term outcomes were compared according to the surgical technique utilized (open versus laparoscopic).
RESULTS: Overall, we identified 216 patients with FAP that underwent elective total colectomy, of which 95 cases were performed by open surgery and 121 were done laparoscopically. The majority of patients were treated at large, not-for-profit, urban teaching hospitals, and the median age was equal (16 years) in both groups. Complications that were more common for open procedures included accidental perforation or hemorrhage (4% vs. 0%, P=0.023), reopening of surgical site (3% vs. 0%, P=0.049), and pneumonia (3% vs. 0%, P=0.049). Simultaneous proctectomy was performed more commonly in the open cohort (91% vs. 71%, P<0.001) as well as ileostomy creation (74% vs. 49%, P<0.001). The median length of stay was similar in the open and laparoscopic groups (7 vs. 6 days, P=0.712). Median total hospital charges were also similar ($67,334 vs. $68,717, P=0.080).
CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic approach for prophylactic colectomy can be safely performed in children with FAP, and total hospital charges are equivalent compared to open surgery. However, simultaneous proctectomy was performed less often with laparoscopic surgery. 2021 Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatric; familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP); laparoscopic surgery; resource utilization

Year:  2021        PMID: 34423161      PMCID: PMC8343412          DOI: 10.21037/tgh-20-190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2415-1289


  16 in total

Review 1.  Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Usama Ahmed Ali; Frederik Keus; Joost T Heikens; Willem A Bemelman; Stephane V Berdah; H G Gooszen; Cees Jhm van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

2.  Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Udo A Heuschen; Ulf Hinz; Erik H Allemeyer; Frank Autschbach; Josef Stern; Matthias Lucas; Christian Herfarth; Gundi Heuschen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Ileal-pouch anal anastomosis in pediatric NSQIP: Does a laparoscopic approach reduce complications and length of stay?

Authors:  Nicholas P McKenna; Donald D Potter; Katherine A Bews; Amy E Glasgow; Kellie L Mathis; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  A laparoscopic approach does reduce short-term complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Fergal J Fleming; Todd D Francone; Michael J Kim; Douglas Gunzler; Susan Messing; John R T Monson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Laparoscopic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), supported by an enhanced recovery programme in cases of familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  F J McNicol; R H Kennedy; R K S Phillips; S K Clark
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy and restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Marco Vitellaro; Giuliano Bonfanti; Paola Sala; Elia Poiasina; Marta Barisella; Stefano Signoroni; Andrea Mancini; Lucio Bertario
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Factors associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Andre da Luz Moreira; Feza H Remzi; James M Church; Ian Lavery; Jeffery Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  30-Day Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Proctocolectomy with Ileoanal Anastomosis in Children and Young Adults: A Combined Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Pediatric and Adult Databases.

Authors:  Jeremy D Kauffman; Christopher W Snyder; Paul D Danielson; Nicole M Chandler
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Outcomes of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  I White; J T Jenkins; R Coomber; S K Clark; R K S Phillips; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Risk of desmoid formation after laparoscopic versus open colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  A Sinha; E M Burns; A Latchford; S K Clark
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.