| Literature DB >> 34422680 |
Yan-Chun Ji1,2,3,4,5, Qian Sun1,2,3,4,5, Chun-Yan Fu1,2,3,4,5, Xiang She1,2,3,4,5, Xiao-Chen Liu1,2,3,4,5, Yu He1,2,3,4,5, Qing Ai1,2,3,4,5, Lu-Quan Li1,2,3,4,5, Zheng-Li Wang1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Autoinducer-2 (AI-2) is believed to be a bacterial interspecies signaling molecule that plays an important role in the regulation of the physiological behaviors of bacteria. The effect of AI-2 on the process of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is unknown, and the aim of this study was to study the effect of AI-2 in a mouse NEC model. C57BL/6 mouse pups were randomly divided into three groups: the control group, the NEC group, and the NEC+AI-2 (NA) group. Exogenous AI-2 (500 nM) was added to the formula milk of the NA group. The concentrations of fecal AI-2 and flora were tested. The expression of cytokines, TLR4 and NF-κB in intestinal tissue was detected. The AI-2 level was significantly decreased in the NEC group (P<0.05). Compared with the NEC group, the intestinal injury scores, expression of TLR4, NF-kB, and proinflammatory factors (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α) were reduced, and expression of anti-inflammatory factor (IL-10) was increased in the NA group mice (P<0.05). At the phylum level, the Proteobacteria abundance in the NA group was significantly increased, while the Bacteroidota abundance in the control group was significantly increased (P<0.05). At the genus level, Helicobacter and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 exhibited significantly greater abundance in the NEC group than in the other two groups, while Lactobacillus had the opposite trend (P<0.05). In addition, the abundances of Klebsiella, Rodentibacter and Enterococcus were significantly higher in the NA group than in the NEC and control groups (P < 0.05). Exogenous AI-2 partially reverses flora disorder and decreases inflammation in an NEC mouse model.Entities:
Keywords: autoinducer-2 (AI-2); cytokines; intestinal flora; intestinal immunity; necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34422680 PMCID: PMC8375469 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.694395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
List of primers.
| Gene | Direction | Primers |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | Forward | TGAAGCAGGCATCTGAGGG |
| TLR4 | Forward | TTTATTCAGAGCCGTTGGTG |
| NF-κB | Forward | ATGTGCATCGGCAAGTGG |
| IL-1β | Forward | TGGTGTGTGACGTTCCCATT |
| IL-6 | Forward | CCAAGAGGTGAGTGCTTCCC |
| IL-8 | Forward | CAAGGCTGGTCCATGCTCC |
| Reverse | TGCTATCACTTCCTTTCTGTTGC | |
| IL-10 | Forward | GCCGTCATTTTCTGCCTCAT |
| TNF-α | Forward | CCAAAGGGATGAGAAGTTCC |
Figure 1(A) The growth of mice in the control group, mice in the NA group and mice in the NEC group. Mice in the NEC group were smaller than those in the control group and NA group. (B) Body weight changes of newborn mice in the three groups. Numbers of samples: Con (n=10), NEC (n=10), and NA (n=10). Statistics: two-way ANOVA multiple comparisons method. (C) Survival curves of newborn mice in three groups. The survival rate was estimated during modeling, and the results are shown as a Kaplan–Meier plot, with 54 mice in each group at the beginning. Statistics: log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test (P < 0.05). Control – normal control, NEC – necrotizing enterocolitis, NA – necrotizing enterocolitis+AI-2.
Figure 2(A–C) Macroscopic morphological analyses of the intestines of newborn mice in the three groups. (D–I) Images of HE staining by light microscopy. The histological damage in the terminal ilea in the three groups, control group (D, G), NEC group (E, H), NA group (F, I). Black rectangle indicates a representative area, with a zoomed-in image. Magnification: ×40, ×100. scale bar = 100μm. (J) Gut histopathological injury scores in the control, NEC and NA group mice. Numbers of samples: Con (n=7), NEC (n=7), and NA (n=7). Statistics: Kruskal-Wallis test (*p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001). Images of HE staining of each sample from the three groups are provided in .
Figure 3The relative bioluminescence values in the mouse stools of AI-2 in the three groups of newborn mice. Numbers of samples: Con (n=10), NEC (n=10), and NA (n=10). Statistics: one-way ANOVA (***p < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).
Figure 4(A) The flora composition of mice in the three groups at the phylum level. (B) The flora composition of mice in the three groups at the genus level. Numbers of samples: Con (n=12), NEC (n=10), and NA (n=11). Statistics: Kruskal-Wallis test with Scheffe’s post-hoc test. * 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.
Figure 5The concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in the three groups were detected by ELISA. (A) The concentrations of IL-1β. (B) The concentrations of IL-6. (C) The concentrations of IL-8. (D) The concentrations of TNF-α. (E) The concentrations of IL-10. Numbers of samples: Con (n=14), NEC (n=14), and NA (n=14). Statistics: one-way ANOVA (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001).
Figure 6(A–C) Expression of the TLR4 and NF-κB (D–F) proteins was assessed in intestinal tissues of the three groups by immunohistochemical staining. Magnification: ×200. Scale bars = 100 μm (TLR4) and 50 μm (NF-κB). Images of immunohistochemical staining of the negative control (secondary antibody and DAB control alone) are provided in . (G–I) Expression of the TLR4 and NF-κB proteins was determined in intestinal tissues of the three groups by western blotting. Numbers of samples: Con (n=7), NEC (n=7), and NA (n=7). Statistics: Kruskal-Wallis test *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.