Richard Kwizera1, Felix Bongomin2, Ronald Olum3, William Worodria4, Freddie Bwanga5, David B Meya6, Bruce J Kirenga7, Robin Gore8, Stephen J Fowler9, David W Denning9. 1. Department of Research, Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. BOX 22418, Kampala, Central, Uganda,Makerere University Lung Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 2. Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 3. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 4. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda, Division of Pulmonology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. 5. Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University Kampala, Uganda. 6. Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 7. Makerere University Lung Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda, Division of Pulmonology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. 8. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK. 9. Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skin prick testing (SPT) is an important investigation in the evaluation of allergy to fungal pathogens. However, the background sensitivity to fungal allergens among healthy people in Uganda is unknown. Our aim was to assess the background prevalence of Aspergillus fumigatus SPT positivity in apparently healthy adults without known atopic disease in Uganda. METHODS: For this pilot study, we recruited 50 healthy volunteers using convenience sampling, 56% of whom were health workers. We performed the SPT for A. fumigatus according to manufacturer's instructions. A wheal diameter of ⩾3 mm was considered positive. RESULTS: The prevalence of A. fumigatus skin positivity was 60% (30/50). Participants with a positive A. fumigatus SPT were significantly younger than those with a negative result [median age (years): 28 versus 35; p = 0.005]. CONCLUSION: There is a high skin positivity against A. fumigatus among non-atopic healthy Ugandan adults. There is an urgent need to establish a normal wheal cut-off value for this population. SPT alone may be an unreliable test for the diagnosis of A. fumigatus associated allergic syndromes. More studies are needed to define the prevalence of A. fumigatus skin positivity among non-atopic healthy population in Africa.
BACKGROUND: Skin prick testing (SPT) is an important investigation in the evaluation of allergy to fungal pathogens. However, the background sensitivity to fungal allergens among healthy people in Uganda is unknown. Our aim was to assess the background prevalence of Aspergillus fumigatus SPT positivity in apparently healthy adults without known atopic disease in Uganda. METHODS: For this pilot study, we recruited 50 healthy volunteers using convenience sampling, 56% of whom were health workers. We performed the SPT for A. fumigatus according to manufacturer's instructions. A wheal diameter of ⩾3 mm was considered positive. RESULTS: The prevalence of A. fumigatus skin positivity was 60% (30/50). Participants with a positive A. fumigatus SPT were significantly younger than those with a negative result [median age (years): 28 versus 35; p = 0.005]. CONCLUSION: There is a high skin positivity against A. fumigatus among non-atopic healthy Ugandan adults. There is an urgent need to establish a normal wheal cut-off value for this population. SPT alone may be an unreliable test for the diagnosis of A. fumigatus associated allergic syndromes. More studies are needed to define the prevalence of A. fumigatus skin positivity among non-atopic healthy population in Africa.
Fungal allergy in the context of asthma,[1] non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis,[2] tuberculosis,[3] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),[4] or fungal rhinosinusitis is one of the most common health problems globally.[5] However, the pathogenic significance of fungi from the genera
Alternaria, Cladosporium,
Penicillium and Aspergillus is poorly
described in Africa.[6] The burden of serious fungal diseases in Uganda is high, with an estimated
2.5 million cases per year,[7] yet the index of clinical suspicion remains low,[8] despite recent evidence showing that Aspergillus species are
significant causes of morbidity in different at-risk populations in
Uganda.[3,6-10]The lungs are the primary site of infection by Aspergillus species,
causing disorders including allergic, chronic, sub-acute and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis,[11] with Aspergillus fumigatus the most commonly implicated species.[12] Human allergic disorders associated with A. fumigatus
include allergic asthma, severe asthma with fungal sensitisation (SAFS), allergic
rhinosinusitis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), and hypersensitivity pneumonitis.[13] In addition, A. fumigatus is isolated frequently from the
respiratory tract of patients with asthma who do not meet the criteria for ABPA or
SAFS, and occasionally in the respiratory tract of healthy individuals.[14] Diagnosis of Aspergillus sensitization requires
demonstration of evidence of allergic sensitization to Aspergillus
either by skin prick testing (SPT) or Aspergillus-specific IgE immunoassays.[1]There is a paucity of data on the frequency of SPT reactivity against
A. fumigatus in healthy adults without known atopic disease. We
therefore aimed to describe the distribution of A. fumigatus SPT
positivity among healthy adults without known atopic disease in Uganda, which will,
in turn, generate hypotheses to encourage further research in this field of fungal
allergy in Uganda.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study evaluating the frequency of
A. fumigatus skin prick positivity among healthy adults without
known atopic disease in Uganda. It was carried out between March and October 2019.
This study was nested within the African Severe Asthma Program (ASAP) clinical study
[ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03065920] at the Makerere University Lung Institute.[15] ASAP is a clinical study with the primary objective being to identify and
characterize severe asthma in Uganda, Kenya, and Ethiopia. Participants provided
written informed consent to participate in this study. Ethics approval for this
sub-study was obtained from the School of Biomedical Sciences Research and Ethics
Committee (SBS 598), the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS
2532), and the Uganda National Drug Authority (9464). All participants in the
current study were healthy adults (⩾18 years), without known atopic disease or
respiratory conditions, and not taking steroids or oral antihistamines for any
reason in the last 7 days. Since there is limited literature on the prevalence of
Aspergillus skin positivity among healthy population, to
understand prevalence of Aspergillus sensitisation in Ugandan
healthy population, we consented and tested healthy volunteers. We used healthy
individuals from the general population, including medical workers, medical
students, and support staff at Makerere University and Kiruddu National Referral
Hospital. A convenience sampling method was employed for this pilot study.A. fumigatus SPT [Immunospec (Pty) Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South
Africa] was performed and the results interpreted according to international guidelines.[16] Normal saline served as a negative control while histamine was the positive
control, with a mean wheal diameter of at least 3 mm being considered positive,
after 15 min of allergen application. We did not perform testing for total serum or
A. fumigatus-specific IgE.Data were analyzed using STATA® version 16 (STATA, College Station, TX, USA). Primary
data analysis aimed to describe the distribution of A. fumigatus
skin prick positivity at a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results
Between March and October 2019, we enrolled 50 eligible participants, of whom 28
(56%) were female; the median age for all participants was 30 years [interquartile
range (IQR) = 27–35). A total of 28 (56%) of the participants were health workers
(Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
Demographics
Frequency (%)
Age, median (IQR)
30 (27–35)
Female, n (%)
28 (56)
Occupation, n (%)
Health worker
28 (56)
Volunteer
5 (10)
Counsellor
4 (8)
Records officer
4 (8)
Student
4 (8)
Information technology specialist
3 (6)
Self employed
1 (2)
Project administrator
1 (2)
IQR, interquartile range.
Baseline characteristics of the study population.IQR, interquartile range.The prevalence of A. fumigatus skin positivity was 60% (30/50) (95%
CI = 45.6–72.8). There was a significant difference in age between participants who
were positive for A. fumigatus skin test and those who were
negative (p = 0.005) (Figure 1). There was no significant
difference in A. fumigatus reactivity by gender
(p = 0.907) or occupation (p = 0.612). None of the
participants reacted to the negative control. Only one participant had a wheal
diameter of 2 mm and the rest had zero against the negative control. Figure 2 is a histogram of
wheal sizes for A. fumigatus skin prick test for this
population.
Figure 1.
Distribution of age by Aspergillus fumigatus skin
positivity.
AspSPT, A. fumigatus skin prick test.
Figure 2.
Distribution of wheal size for Aspergillus fumigatus. Wheal
size (µ) is measured in millimeters.
Distribution of age by Aspergillus fumigatus skin
positivity.AspSPT, A. fumigatus skin prick test.Distribution of wheal size for Aspergillus fumigatus. Wheal
size (µ) is measured in millimeters.
Discussion
In the present study, we report a high prevalence (60%) of
A. fumigatus skin positivity among healthy adults without known
atopic disease in Uganda. This could indicate the fact that apparently healthy
people have an undiagnosed fungal atopy. Alternatively, this could also indicate
that A. fumigatus is the commonest fungal allergen in Uganda,
similar to what is reported in the developed countries. However, a study from India
showed a 2% prevalence of A. fumigatus skin positivity among
healthy controls.[17] In addition, our previous work among adult asthmatics in Uganda showed a
lower prevalence (48%) of A. fumigatus skin reactivity than the 60%
observed in this study despite the atopic nature of asthmatics.[10] We cannot rule out the possibility of cross-reactivity to
A. fumigatus crude extracts, which often do not indicate
genuine sensitization.[13,18] Besides, products secreted after conidial germination into
hyphae can be differentially recognized by protective T-cells in healthy non-atopic individuals.[19] Therefore, SPT should not be used alone to diagnose
A. fumigatus sensitivity in Uganda since the background
prevalence in healthy populations is apparently very high based on the results of
this pilot study. However, we recommend that larger studies be carried out to
confirm these data. The in vitro A. fumigatus-specific IgE may be
more informative to reflect the actual burden. Those with skin positivity were
significantly younger. However, the reason for this observation is unclear and not
really clinically relevant.Our study is limited by its very small sample size and sampling frame, which limits
its generalization to the general population. The optimal cut-off wheal size to
define A. fumigatus in our population is unknown. This could have
led to an over-estimation of the prevalence of A. fumigatus SPT
reactivity in this population. One uncertainty is whether the 3 mm cut-off is
appropriate for Uganda; a 5 mm cut-off would reduce the prevalence of
A. fumigatus sensitisation to 8%, which is more reasonable.
Therefore, we propose to define a suitable cut-off wheal size in healthy adults.
However, our estimate provides baseline information to encourage further research in
the field of fungal allergy in Africa. More studies are needed to define the
prevalence of A. fumigatus skin positivity among non-atopic healthy
population in Africa. There is an urgent need to establish a normal wheal cut-off
value for this population.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we found a high prevalence of A. fumigatus skin
positivity in apparently healthy non-atopic individuals in Uganda. Those with skin
positivity were significantly younger. Given a very high background
A. fumigatus skin positivity rate in our setting, SPT alone may
be an unreliable test for the diagnosis of A. fumigatus-associated
allergic syndromes. We propose to define a suitable cut-off wheal size in healthy
adults.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-1-tai-10.1177_20499361211039040 for Prevalence of
Aspergillus fumigatus skin positivity in adults without an apparent/known atopic
disease in Uganda by Richard Kwizera, Felix Bongomin, Ronald Olum, William
Worodria, Freddie Bwanga, David B. Meya, Bruce J. Kirenga, Robin Gore, Stephen
J. Fowler and David W. Denning in Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease
Authors: B J Ferguson; L Barnes; J M Bernstein; D Brown; C E Clark; P R Cook; W S DeWitt; S M Graham; B Gordon; A R Javer; J H Krouse; F A Kuhn; H L Levine; S C Manning; B F Marple; A H Morgan; J D Osguthorpe; D Skedros; B M Rains; H H Ramadan; J E Terrell; A J Yonkers Journal: Otolaryngol Clin North Am Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: S Dhooria; P Kumar; B Saikia; A N Aggarwal; D Gupta; D Behera; A Chakrabarti; R Agarwal Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Richard Kwizera; Vincent Wadda; Levicatus Mugenyi; Hellen Aanyu-Tukamuhebwa; George Nyale; Getnet Yimer; Jeremiah Chakaya; Corina De Jong; Thys Van der Molen; David W Denning; Robin Gore; Bruce J Kirenga Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 4.084