| Literature DB >> 34422185 |
Joseph Tochukwu Enebe1, Nympha Onyinye Enebe2, Chuka Chike Agunwa2, Obinna Chukwuebuka Nduagubam3, Innocent Igwebeze Okafor1, Elias Chike Aniwada2, Emmanuel Nwabueze Aguwa2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: cervical cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in women and vaccination of adolescents with human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines is a major preventive strategy for this cancer. Despite the usefulness of cervical cancer vaccines, significant gaps still exist in the level of awareness and acceptability of the vaccine among women. This study aimed to determine the level of awareness, acceptability, and identify the factors associated with the uptake of this vaccine by female secondary school teachers in Enugu, Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; human papillomavirus; teachers; vaccination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34422185 PMCID: PMC8363950 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.62.28824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants
| Variables | Frequency (n=377) | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.5 | |
| 20-29 | 75 | 19.9 |
| 30-39 | 153 | 40.6 |
| 40-49 | 100 | 26.5 |
| 50-59 | 45 | 11.9 |
| 60-69 | 2 | 0.5 |
| Mean=37.46 SD=9.15, Range=18-60 | ||
|
| ||
| Head | 37 | 9.8 |
| Spouse | 276 | 73.2 |
| Children | 64 | 17.0 |
|
| ||
| 1-5 | 193 | 51.2 |
| 6-10 | 176 | 46.7 |
| 11-15 | 8 | 2.1 |
|
| ||
| 1-5 | 157 | 41.6 |
| 6-10 | 95 | 25.2 |
| 11-15 | 38 | 10.1 |
| 16-20 | 46 | 12.2 |
| 21-25 | 19 | 5.0 |
| 26-30 | 13 | 3.4 |
| 31-35 | 9 | 2.4 |
| Mean = 10.08, SD=8.072, Mode = 5, Range= 1-35 | ||
|
| ||
| Secondary | 17 | 4.5 |
| Tertiary | 260 | 69.0 |
| Postgraduate | 100 | 26.5 |
|
| ||
| Married in monogamous | 286 | 75.9 |
| Married in polygamous | 10 | 2.7 |
| Divorced | 2 | 0.5 |
| Widowed | 25 | 6.6 |
| Single | 52 | 13.8 |
| Separated | 2 | 0.5 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 93 | 24.7 |
| No | 284 | 75.3 |
the knowledge of cervical cancer vaccine among respondents
| Variable | Category | Frequency (n=377) | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Think cervical cancer can be prevented through vaccination | Yes | 195 | 48.3 |
| No | 182 | 51.7 | |
| Heard of cervical cancer vaccine? | Yes | 208 | 55.2 |
| No | 169 | 44.8 | |
| Knowledge of cervical cancer vaccination | Good knowledge | 158 | 41.9 |
| Poor knowledge | 218 | 57.8 | |
|
| |||
| Mass media | Yes | 65 | 30.23 |
| No | 150 | 69.77 | |
| Friends | Yes | 38 | 17.67 |
| No | 177 | 82.33 | |
| Health workers | Yes | 80 | 37.21 |
| No | 135 | 62.79 | |
| Meetings | Yes | 5 | 2.33 |
| No | 210 | 97.67 | |
| Conference | Yes | 24 | 11.16 |
| No | 191 | 88.84 | |
| Schools | Yes | 6 | 2.79 |
| No | 209 | 97.21 | |
| Churches | Yes | 11 | 5.12 |
| No | 204 | 94.88 | |
| Social media | Yes | 13 | 6.05 |
| No | 202 | 93.95 |
the levels of acceptability of cervical cancer vaccination by respondents
| Variable | Responses | Frequency (n=377) | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondents who have taught students cervical cancer | Yes | 55 | 14.6 |
| No | 322 | 85.4 | |
| Respondents who have taught students on cervical cancer vaccine | Yes | 28 | 7.4 |
| No | 349 | 92.6 | |
| Respondents with a programme addressing cervical cancer vaccination | Yes | 34 | 9.0 |
| No | 343 | 91.0 | |
| Respondents who will recommend to their school programmes addressing cervical cancer/vaccination | Yes | 322 | 85.4 |
| No | 27 | 7.4 |
the use of cervical cancer vaccine by respondents on both themselves and their children, complications of vaccine use and reasons for non-administration
| Variable | Category | Responses | Frequency (n=377) | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Administration of vaccine by the respondent | Yes | 13 | 3.4 |
| No | 364 | 96.6 | ||
| Vaccinated children before | Yes | 21 | 5.6 | |
| No | 356 | 94.4 | ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
| fever | yes | 3 | 11.11 |
| No | 24 | 88.89 | ||
| convulsions | Yes | 0 | 0 | |
| No | 27 | 100 | ||
| vomiting | Yes | 0 | 0 | |
| No | 27 | 100 | ||
| Headache | Yes | 2 | 7.41 | |
| No | 25 | 92.59 | ||
| Severe pains | Yes | 6 | 22.22 | |
| No | 21 | 77.78 | ||
| Abscess formation | Yes | 1 | 3.70 | |
| No | 26 | 96.30 | ||
| Redness at injection site | Yes | 2 | 7.14 | |
| No | 25 | 92.59 | ||
| No complication | Yes | 13 | 48.15 | |
| No | 14 | 51.85 | ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Fear of complication | Yes | 16 | 7.88 |
| No | 187 | 92.12 | ||
| The high cost of the vaccine | Yes | 51 | 25.12 | |
| No | 152 | 74.88 | ||
| Promiscuity | Yes | 1 | 0.49 | |
| No | 202 | 99.51 | ||
| Non-availability | Yes | 94 | 46.31 | |
| No | 109 | 53.69 | ||
| Don´t believe in HPV vaccination | Yes | 9 | 4.43 | |
| No | 194 | 95.56 | ||
| Poor information on the use of the vaccine | Yes | 10 | 4.63 | |
| No | 193 | 95.07 | ||
| Unaware of the use of the vaccine | Yes | 11 | 5.42 | |
| No | 192 | 94.58 |
factors associated with the administration of cervical cancer vaccines on children and relatives by respondents who have heard of the cervical cancer vaccine
| Variable | Vaccinated children/relatives | Chi-square | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heard of cervical cancer vaccine? | Yes | No | ||||
|
| Yes | 10-19 | 1 | 1 | 19.804 | 0.001 |
| 20-29 | 11 | 33 | ||||
| 30-39 | 7 | 75 | ||||
| 40-49 | 2 | 55 | ||||
| 50-59 | 0 | 21 | ||||
| 60-69 | 0 | 2 | ||||
|
| Yes | Married monogamous | 13 | 140 | 8.397 | 0.078 |
| Married polygamous | 0 | 8 | ||||
| Divorced | 0 | 2 | ||||
| Widowed | 0 | 9 | ||||
| Single | 8 | 28 | ||||
|
| Yes | 1-5 | 15 | 72 | 11.311 | 0.079 |
| 6-10 | 3 | 46 | ||||
| 11-15 | 3 | 23 | ||||
| 16-20 | 0 | 27 | ||||
| 21-25 | 0 | 10 | ||||
| 26-30 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| 31-35 | 0 | 3 | ||||
|
| Yes | Head | 0 | 14 | 12.225 | 0.002 |
| Spouse | 11 | 142 | ||||
| Children | 10 | 31 | ||||
|
| Yes | 1-5 | 10 | 85 | 0.371 | 0.831 |
| 6-10 | 10 | 97 | ||||
| 11-15 | 1 | 5 | ||||
|
| Yes | Secondary | 2 | 8 | 1.580 | 0.454 |
| Tertiary | 14 | 118 | ||||
| Post-graduate | 5 | 61 | ||||
|
| yes | Vaccinated | 10 | 3 | 68.225 | 0.000 |
| Not vaccinated | 11 | 187 | ||||
|
| Yes | School programme exists | 9 | 21 | 15.30 | 0.000 |
| No school programme | 12 | 166 | ||||
|
| Yes | Have taught before | 6 | 21 | ||
| Have not taught students | 15 | 166 | 5.026 | 0.025 | ||
economic factors associated with vaccination of children/relatives by respondents
| Variables | Vaccinated children/relatives | Chi-square | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heard of cervical cancer vaccine? | Yes | No | ||||
| Average monthly income category | Yes | <18000 | 1 | 9 | 12.704 | 0.013 |
| 18000-49999 | 14 | 81 | ||||
| 50000-99999 | 2 | 80 | ||||
| 100000-199999 | 2 | 14 | ||||
| >199999 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Average Husband income | Yes | <18000 | 0 | 0 | 4.837 | 0.565 |
| 18000-49999 | 0 | 23 | ||||
| 50000-99999 | 6 | 56 | ||||
| 100000-199999 | 6 | 50 | ||||
| 200000-499999 | 1 | 18 | ||||
| 500000-999999 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| > 999999 | 0 | 2 | ||||
predictors of cervical cancer vaccination among respondents
| Socio-demographic/other characteristics | Category | Adjusted odds ratio | p-value | 95% Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Limit | Upper Limit | ||||
| Age category | 10-19 years | 0.400 | 0.602 | 0.149 | 3.015 |
| 70-79 years | 1 | ||||
| Household status | Others | 0.565 | 0.551 | 0.089 | 3.641 |
| Head | 1 | ||||
| Marital status | Married monogamous | 0.016 | 0.956 | 0.570 | 1.812 |
| Separated | 1 | ||||
| Received cervical cancer vaccine | Yes | 6.069 |
| 0.000 | 0.041 |
| No | 1 | ||||
| Existing school program on cervical cancer | Yes | 2.646 | 0.705 | 0.097 | 4.858 |
| No | 1 | ||||
| Teaches cervical cancer to students | Yes | 1.464 | 0.444 | 0.088 | 2.907 |
| No | 1 | ||||
| Years of teaching | >30 years | 1.170 | 0.054 | 0.987 | 5.601 |
| 1 - 10years | 1 | ||||
| Average monthly income | <₦18,000 | 0.089 | 0.831 | 0.482 | 2.480 |
| ₦1,000,000 | 1 | ||||
| Non-food cost category | <₦50,000 | 0.348 | 0.547 | 0.227 | 2.193 |
| >₦2,000,000 | 1 | ||||