| Literature DB >> 34422164 |
Balcha Girma Masresha1, Carine Dochez2, Ado Bwaka3, Meseret Eshetu4, Gilson Paluku5, Richard Mihigo1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: regular in-service training of healthcare workers within the immunization program is critical to address the program needs created by the introduction of new vaccines and technologies, as well as the expanding scope of immunisation programmes beyond infant immunization and towards a life-course approach. National immunization programs conduct in-service training of health workers depending on program needs and particularly when new program elements are introduced.Entities:
Keywords: Immunization; capacity building; mid-level managers; training needs; vaccination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34422164 PMCID: PMC8356935 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.41.29492
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
demographic characteristics of respondents
| Responses | Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Chad | 39 | 16.3% |
| Cote D'Ivoire | 13 | 5.4% | |
| DR Congo | 60 | 25.0% | |
| Gabon | 17 | 7.1% | |
| Liberia | 22 | 9.2% | |
| Malawi | 19 | 7.9% | |
| Namibia | 12 | 5.0% | |
| S Sudan | 44 | 18.3% | |
| Togo | 14 | 5.8% | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| National | 88 | 37.0% |
| Provincial | 95 | 39.9% | |
| District | 55 | 23.1% | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Immunization program Manager | 10 | 4.2% |
| Public health expert | 78 | 32.5% | |
| Logistician | 10 | 4.2% | |
| Data manager | 21 | 8.8% | |
| Communications | 8 | 3.3% | |
| Surveillance | 69 | 28.8% | |
| other | 44 | 18.3% | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| less than 2 years | 22 | 9.1% |
| 2 - 5 years | 54 | 22.4% | |
| 6 - 10 years | 51 | 21.2% | |
| more than 10 years | 114 | 47.3% | |
|
|
|
|
reasons provided to justify the need of MLM training in the 9 countries
| Reason why MLM training may be needed | Responses | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Need to train new program staff/ high staff turnover | 213 | 88.80% |
| Performance gaps to improve | 187 | 77.90% |
| Too long since last training - refresher training needed | 143 | 59.60% |
| Introduction of new technology | 121 | 50.40% |
| New program priorities in the coming months and years | 88 | 36.70% |
| New administrative units/ districts created | 78 | 32.50% |
| Others | 18 | 7.50% |
Figure 1immunization program areas identified for training
immunization program topics prioritized for MLM training by respondents
| Program area | Area identified for training need | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
|
| district micro-planning | 67.7% |
| identifying reasons for coverage gaps | 66.4% | |
| defaulter tracking | 66.4% | |
| identifying hard-to-reach populations | 58.3% | |
| immunization program operational planning | 53.6% | |
| general problem solving | 46.4% | |
| strategic planning | 45.1% | |
| planning for introducing new vaccines | 39.1% | |
|
| involving the community | 71.5% |
| identifying community perceptions and knowledge gaps | 70.6% | |
| conducting advocacy for immunisation | 58.7% | |
| immunization program stakeholder analysis | 58.7% | |
| identifying communications barriers | 58.3% | |
| developing messaging for social mobilisation | 44.3% | |
|
| resource mobilization for immunization | 80.4% |
| developing strategies for sustainable financing of immunisation | 80.0% | |
| budgeting immunization activities | 51.1% | |
| calculating immunization program costs | 42.1% | |
|
| monitoring cold chain operations | 67.7% |
| managing vaccine stocks | 62.6% | |
| estimating and forecasting vaccine needs | 57.0% | |
| estimating cold chain space needs | 57.0% | |
| doing a cold chain inventory | 43.0% | |
|
| improving immunization data management and data quality | 80.9% |
| monitoring immunization data quality | 76.2% | |
| establishing immunisation program monitoring systems | 57.0% | |
| analysis and interpretation of immunization monitoring data | 57.0% | |
| selecting monitoring indicators | 40.0% | |
|
| investigating and responding to AEFIs | 77.4% |
| causality assessment of AEFIs | 74.5% | |
| ensuring vaccine and injection safety in daily vaccination activities | 53.2% | |
|
| reaching zero dose children during SIAs | 73.6% |
| monitoring readiness of SIAs | 58.7% | |
| SIAs planning | 58.3% | |
| ensuring vaccine safety during SIAs | 49.8% | |
|
| using surveillance data for immunisation program action | 70.2% |
| improving VPD surveillance performance | 64.7% | |
| mobilising funding for surveillance and laboratory | 64.7% | |
| investigating outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases | 54.9% | |
| analysing and interpreting surveillance data | 53.6% | |
| implementing active surveillance | 51.1% | |
|
| conducting effective Supportive supervision | 77.9% |
| providing supervisory feedback | 63.0% | |
| prioritizing for supervision | 57.0% | |
|
| minimising missed opportunities for vaccination | 74.9% |
| implementing the RED approach | 68.5% | |
| planning immunisation program reviews | 56.2% | |
| establishing vaccination in the second year of life and beyond | 54.5% |