| Literature DB >> 34421922 |
Heng Gu1, Longyu Li2, Mengxuan Du1,3, Hang Xu1,3, Mengge Gao1,3, Xiaohua Liu1, Xiangcai Wei3,4, Xingming Zhong1,3.
Abstract
Identifying the mechanisms underlying unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) can help develop effective treatments. This study provides novel insights into the biological characteristics and related pathways of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in URSA. Nineteen patients with URSA and three healthy fertile women with regular menstruation (control group) were recruited. RNA was extracted from the two groups to determine the differential expression of immunoregulatory gene sequences. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were used to identify the biological functions and pathways of the identified DEGs. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the STRING database. Furthermore, qRT-PCR and ELISA were performed to validate the differential expression of the hub genes. We also explored the regulatory mechanism of Th1/Th2 imbalance. A total of 99 DEGs were identified, comprising 94 upregulated and five downregulated genes. Through GO analysis, nine immune cell function-related clusters were selected, and genes with significant differential expression were primarily enriched in eight immune regulatory functions related to the KEGG signalling pathway. Subsequently, five hub genes (TLR2, CXCL8, IFNG, IL2RA, and ITGAX) were identified using Cytoscape software; qRT-PCR confirmed the differential expression among the hub genes, whereas ELISA revealed a significant difference in extracellular IFN-γ and IL-8 levels. The levels of Th1 (IFN-γ) and the Th1/Th2 ratio were higher in the peripheral blood of URSA patients than in control group patients. These findings suggest that the occurrence of URSA may be associated with the abnormal expression of some specific immunoregulatory genes involved in T-cell activation and differentiation. Among the identified DEGs, IFNG may play a key role in regulating maternal immune response. Although further validation is required, our data provide an important theoretical basis for elucidating the pathogenesis of recurrent spontaneous abortion.Entities:
Keywords: Th1/Th2 imbalance; differentially expressed genes; interferon gamma; recurrent spontaneous abortion; ribonucleic acid sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34421922 PMCID: PMC8375436 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.717832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Primers for hub genes validated using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
| Genes | Accession No | Primer | Sequence(5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFNG | NM_000619.3 | IFNG-F | TCCAAGTGATGGCTGAACTG |
| IFNG-R | CTCTTCGACCTCGAAACAGC | ||
| ITGAX | NM_000887.5 | ITGAX-F | GTGGTGGTGTGATGCTGTTC |
| ITGAX-R | ATACTGCAGCCTGGAGGAGA | ||
| TLR2 | NM_001318787.2 | TLR2-F | TGATGCTGCCATTCTCATTC |
| TLR2-R | CGCAGCTCTCAGATTTACCC | ||
| IL2RA | NM_000417.3 | IL2RA-F | ATCAGTGCGTCCAGGGATAC |
| IL2RA-R | GACGAGGCAGGAAGTCTCAC | ||
| CXCL8 | NM_000584.4 | CXCL8-F | GTGCAGTTTTGCCAAGGAGT |
| CXCL8-R | CTCTGCACCCAGTTTTCCTT |
Comparison of basic clinical characteristics between case and control group.
| Control group (n = 3) | Case group (n = 19) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| age (years old) | 31.67 ± 2.08 | 30.26 ± 2.60 | 0.387 |
| Height(m) | 1.59 ± 0.02 | 1.59 ± 0.04 | 0.787 |
| Weight (kg) | 60.33 ± 6.81 | 56.84 ± 9.11 | 0.535 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.84 ± 2.36 | 22.52 ± 3.27 | 0.512 |
| FSH (mIU/ml) | 6.69 ± 0.45 | 6.90 ± 1.12 | 0.748 |
| LH (mIU/ml) | 6.25 ± 2.34 | 8.60 ± 5.55 | 0.857 |
| LH/FSH | 0.92 ± 0.29 | 1.30 ± 0.95 | 0.857 |
| E2(pmmol/L) | 170.73 ± 29.28 | 207.14 ± 62.79 | 0.343 |
| PRL (mIU/L) | 920.00 ± 573.15 | 430.11 ± 263.26 | 0.108 |
| T(nmol/L) | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 0.94 ± 0.74 | 0.787 |
Data are shown as mean± SD; BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, estradiol; PRL, prolactin; T, testosterone; p value < 0.05 was considered as significant.
Figure 1Differential gene volcano map between the case and the control group. The dotted line indicates p = 0.05.
Immune cell function GO clustering of significantly differentially expressed gene.
| ID | Function | Type | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0042110 | T cell activation | BP | 19 | 4.60E-14 |
| GO:1903706 | regulation of hemopoiesis | BP | 15 | 2.78E-10 |
| GO:0051249 | regulation of lymphocyte activation | BP | 15 | 1.48E-09 |
| GO:0030098 | lymphocyte differentiation | BP | 14 | 2.27E-10 |
| GO:0030217 | T cell differentiation | BP | 13 | 2.27E-11 |
| GO:1902105 | regulation of leukocyte differentiation | BP | 13 | 1.07E-10 |
| GO:0050863 | regulation of T cell activation | BP | 13 | 6.07E-10 |
| GO:0046651 | lymphocyte proliferation | BP | 12 | 1.42E-09 |
| GO:0032943 | mononuclear cell proliferation | BP | 12 | 1.55E-09 |
p value < 0.05 was considered as significant.
KEGG enrichment analysis results of significant gene DEGs between the case group and the control group.
| ID | Description | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| hsa04650 | Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity | 9 | 1.34E-06 |
| hsa04145 | Phagosome | 9 | 4.20E-06 |
| hsa04060 | Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction | 9 | 0.000276395 |
| hsa05140 | Leishmaniasis | 8 | 1.13E-07 |
| hsa05145 | Toxoplasmosis | 8 | 1.13E-05 |
| hsa05200 | Pathways in cancer | 8 | 0.00504406 |
| hsa04612 | Antigen processing and presentation | 7 | 2.98E-06 |
| hsa05323 | Rheumatoid arthritis | 7 | 9.04E-06 |
p value < 0.05 was considered as significant.
Figure 2Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the dysregulated genes.
Figure 3Identified the hub gene by Cytohubba. In the network, TLR2,CXCL8, IFNG, IL2RA, and ITGAX were calculated as the top 5 hub genes.
Figure 4Different expression of the top 5 hub genes in cases and controls verified using qRT-PCR. ***p < 0.05.
Figure 5The relative expression of cytokine and chemokine receptors in case and control groups. ***p < 0.05.
Comparison of Th1, Th2, Th1/Th2 between the case group and the control group.
| Cohort | Control (n = 18) | URSA (n = 227) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| variable | Mean | Median | Range | SD | Mean | Median | Range | SD | |
| Th1* | 16.94 | 15.80 | 7.60-34.39 | 7.26 | 22.44 | 21.37 | 0.16–61.42 | 10.50 | 0.031 |
| Th2 | 2.68 | 1.62 | 0.39-13.40 | 2.95 | 2.19 | 1.52 | 0.10–10.45 | 1.85 | 0.460 |
| Th1/Th2* | 11.00 | 9.06 | 0.84-31.87 | 8.51 | 15.85 | 12.74 | 1.60–55.16 | 11.01 | 0.049 |
*p < 0.05.
Figure 6Histogram of Th1 (IFN-γ), Th2 (IL-4), and Th1/Th2 ratio. ***p < 0.05.
Figure 7Diagram of IFN-γ involved in Th1/Th2 cell differentiation signalling pathway. Figure obtained from https://www.rndsystems.com/pathways.