| Literature DB >> 34420978 |
Emily R Mears1, Renee R Handley1, Matthew J Grant1, Suzanne J Reid1, Benjamin T Day2, Skye R Rudiger3, Clive J McLaughlan3, Paul J Verma3, Simon C Bawden3, Stefano Patassini1,4,5, Richard D Unwin4,5,6, Garth J S Cooper1,4,5, James F Gusella7,8, Marcy E MacDonald7,9, Rudiger Brauning10, Paul Maclean10, John F Pearson11, Henry J Waldvogel12, Richard L M Faull12, Russell G Snell1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pathological mechanism of cellular dysfunction and death in Huntington's disease (HD) is not well defined. Our transgenic HD sheep model (OVT73) was generated to investigate these mechanisms and for therapeutic testing. One particular cohort of animals has undergone focused investigation resulting in a large interrelated multi-omic dataset, with statistically significant changes observed comparing OVT73 and control 'omic' profiles and reported in literature.Entities:
Keywords: Huntington’s disease; RNA-seq; animal models; computational biology; database; genetics; metabolomics; proteomics; sheep; systems biology
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34420978 PMCID: PMC8673501 DOI: 10.3233/JHD-210482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Huntingtons Dis ISSN: 1879-6397
Fig. 1An overview of our approach to the integration and exploratory analysis of multi-omic data from a sheep model of Huntington’s disease. Seven datasets (transcriptomic, metabolic, and proteomic) collected from brain and peripheral tissues of a single cohort of 5-year-old OVT73 (n = 6) and control (n = 6) sheep were integrated into a multi-omic platform in R for multivariate analyses. Within the platform, individual datasets can be analysed and visualised using a range of exploratory multivariate techniques as presented in this report. The data and a selection of statistical functions have been made available as a user-queryable, interactive, online database https://hdsheep.cer.auckland.ac.nz/Figure created with BioRender.com.
HD Sheep harvest and biometric information
| Sheep ID | Sex | Status | Generation | DOB | Age | Body weight (kg) | Date of harvest | Brain weight (g) | Cerebrum length (cm) | PM delay (min) |
| C373EG2 | Ewe | C | G2 | 25/02/2007 | 5y 4m | 76.4 | 6/06/2012 | 128.87 | 8 | 52 |
| C382EG2 | Ewe | C | G2 | 01/03/2007 | 5y 4m | 86.6 | 7/06/2012 | 132.46 | 8 | 41 |
| C337RG1 | Ram | C | G1 | 24/08/2006 | 5y 10m | 94.4 | 8/06/2012 | 126.09 | 8 | 62 |
| C335RG1 | Ram | C | G1 | 23/08/2006 | 5y 10m | 74.2 | 12/06/2012 | 123.67 | 8 | 50 |
| C357RG1 | Ram | C | G1 | 26/08/2006 | 5y 10m | 104 | 13/06/2012 | 138.63 | 8 | 56 |
| C334RG1 | Ram | C | G1 | 23/08/2006 | 5y 10m | 104 | 14/06/2012 | 143.71 | 8.5 | 63 |
| T372EG2 | Ewe | T | G2 | 25/02/2007 | 5y 4m | 72 | 6/06/2012 | 124.18 | 8 | 47 |
| T377EG2 | Ewe | T | G2 | 27/02/2007 | 5y 4m | 75.6 | 7/06/2012 | 128.19 | 8.5 | 45 |
| T376EG2 | Ewe | T | G2 | 27/02/2007 | 5y 4m | 73.2 | 8/06/2012 | 118.24 | 7.5 | 46 |
| T317RG1 | Ram | T | G1 | 20/08/2006 | 5y 10m | 85.8 | 12/06/2012 | 124.58 | 8 | 61 |
| T339RG1 | Ram | T | G1 | 24/08/2006 | 5y 10m | 88 | 13/06/2012 | 123.75 | 7.5 | 55 |
| T383RG2 | Ram | T | G2 | 25/02/2007 | 5y 4m | 91.4 | 14/06/2012 | 129.24 | 7.5 | 62 |
Harvest details and biometric data from the 5-year-old sheep cohort (OVT73 = 6, Control = 6). C, Control sheep; T, Transgenic sheep (OVT73); DOB, date of birth; PM, postmortem; y, years; m, months; kg, kilograms; g, grams; cm, centimetres; min, minutes.
Summary of datasets integrated into the multi-omic HD sheep platform/database
|
|
| # |
|
|
|
| 1 | Transcriptomic | 25860 | Striatum dorsal-medial portion (652) | RNA sequencing analysis to identify differentially expressed genes in the striatum. | [ |
| 2 | Transcriptomic | 25 | Striatum DL (2) DM portions (11) | nanoString quantification of 24 genes to validate findings identified in Ref.data 1. | [ |
| 3 | Transcriptomic | 18280 | Striatal matrix-derived neurons via laser-captured microdissection - LCM (310) | RNA sequencing analysis to identify differentially expressed genes in striatal neurons specifically. | unpublished |
| 4 | Metabolomic | Up to 62 | Motor cortex (2) Cerebellum (3) Hippocampus (0) Liver (0) | GS-MS metabolite assessment of ∼50 metabolites. | [ |
| 5 | Metabolomic | Up to 168 | Motor cortex (7) Cerebellum (8) Plasma (4) Liver (7) | Biocrates LC-MS metabolite assessment of ∼180 metabolites. | unpublished |
| 6 | Proteomic | 2075 (Cerebellum) 2171 (Motor cortex) 2287 (Striatum) | Striatum (39) Motor cortex (17) Cerebellum (21) | Relative quantification of protein abundance in sub-regions of the brain via LC-MS-MS coupled with isobaric mass tagging (iTRAQ). | Unpublished |
| 7 | Follow-up | 2 | Cerebellum (0) Hippocampus (0) Motor cortex (0) Striatum (1) Bladder (0) Heart (0) Kidney (0) Liver (0) Testes (0) Serum (2) Urine (0) | Biochemical quantification of urea via enzymatic assay as further investigation of findings in Ref data 1. and 2. | [ |
All data was collected from the same cohort of 5-year-old sheep (OVT73 = 6, control = 6). For the purpose of this report, each dataset has been assigned a unique reference number, detailed here, together with the type of ‘omic’ data collected, tissues analysed, a brief description of the study and the associated publications. The number of detected variables is included along with the number of these variables in OVT73 vs. control comparison that are nominally significant (split by tissue type where relevant). DE, differentially expressed; GC-MS, Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; LC-MS, Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; LC-MS-MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrophotometry; iTRAQ, Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation.
Fig. 2Comparison of SLC14A1 expression in four different transcriptomic datasets within the multi-omic HD sheep platform. SLC14A1 is significantly upregulated (p < 0.05, two tailed T-test) in the OVT73 brain (n = 6) relative to control animals (n = 6). A) Ref. data 1: An RNA-Seq analysis conducted on striatum samples, B) Ref. data 3: An RNA-Seq analysis conducted on striatal matrix-derived neurons preferentially captured via laser-captured microdissection. C, D) Ref. data 2: nanoString quantification of 24 genes conducted on samples taken from dorsolateral (C) and dorsomedial (D) striatum. In all graphs the x-axis displays the transgenic status of the sheep (Control or OVT73) and the y-axis displays normalised SLC14A1 levels (FPKM for RNA-Seq data and normalised counts for nanoString data). Direct visual comparison of datasets as shown was performed using the ggplot2 package in R.
Fig. 3OVT73 have more significant metabolite-metabolite correlations than controls. The ggcorrplot() function in R was applied to GC-MS metabolomics dataset (Ref. data 4), producing correlation coefficients, p-values and visual plots, as shown, for every variable-variable pair, with comparison of OVT73 and control groups. Significantly positively correlated metabolites are displayed as red squares and significantly negatively correlated metabolites are displayed as blue squares (p < 0.05) according to the figure legend. As shown by the number of coloured squares, there were more significantly correlated metabolite-metabolite pairs in the OVT73 cerebellum (B) and liver (D) compared to their respective control plots; control cerebellum (A) and control liver (C).
Fig. 4The HD sheep database https://hdsheep.cer.auckland.ac.nz/. Examples of two analyses tabs within the HD sheep database: A) Student’s T-test and B) Differential correlation plots. These analyses can be used to investigate data in a query-based manner, comparing OVT73 sheep to controls, with variable selection. Results are displayed as informative graphical outputs for interpretation by the researcher. A shows a significant difference in OVT73 vs. control SLC14A1 expression in the dorsomedial striatal tissue (p < 0.007). B shows differential correlation structures in OVT73 vs. control for SLC14A1 and RHCG transcript expression in dorsomedial striatal tissue.