| Literature DB >> 34419836 |
Kori S Zachrison1, Richa Sharma2, Yulun Wang3, Ateev Mehrotra4, Lee H Schwamm5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Most data on telestroke utilization come from single academic hub-and-spoke telestroke networks. Our objective was to describe characteristics of telestroke consultations among a national sample of telestroke sites on one of the most commonly used common vendor platforms, prior to the COVID-19 public health emergency.Entities:
Keywords: Acute stroke care; Alteplase; Emergency care; Stroke; Telestroke
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34419836 PMCID: PMC8494566 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ISSN: 1052-3057 Impact factor: 2.136
Characteristics of sites receiving telestroke consultations.
| Site Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Consults per year, mean (SD) | 110.2 (156.6) |
| Hospital size | |
| Rural | 43 (33.9%) |
| U.S. Region | |
| Average of median door-to-needle times, minutes | 72.9 (198.7) |
| Average of percentage of eligible patients treated with alteplase, (SD) | 35.5% (27.3) |
Legend: SD, standard deviation; RUCA, rural-urban commuting area
See Supplemental Table 1 for Hospital Size categories.
Telestroke encounter characteristics.
| Age, mean (SD) | 64.9 (17.0) |
| Sex, % Male | 21,968 (45.4%) |
| Consults per Year | |
| Consults per year per spoke (median, IQR) | |
| Consult location | |
| Consult type | |
| Final Clinical Impression | |
| NIHSS | |
| Imaging reviewed, yes | 37,523 (94.6%) |
| Alteplase recommendation | |
| Alteplase administered in the full cohort, n (%) | |
| Door-to-Needle Time, median (IQR) | 53 min (42, 73) |
| Disposition, transfer | 3190 (8.4%) |
| Disposition of IS patients | |
| Endovascular treatment in IS patients, |
Legend. SD standard deviation; IS Ischemic stroke; IQR interquartile range
Fig. 1Trends in Telestroks Consultations Time Mertics 2013–2019.
Relationship between receiving hospital characteristics and performance on alteplase delivery: number of patients treated with alteplase per year.
| Variable | Unadjusted change in number of patients treated per change in variable unit | Adjusted change in number of patients treated per change in variable unit | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consults per year (unit=100 consults) | 2.57 | <0.0001 | 2.54 | <0.0001 |
| Hospital size | ||||
| Rurality | -0.6 | 0.03 | -0.03 | 0.88 |
| U.S. region |
Relationship between receiving hospital characteristics and performance on door-to-needle time for alteplase delivery.
| Variable | Unadjusted change in time (minutes) per change in variable unit | Adjusted change in time (minutes) per change in variable unit | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consults per year (units=100 consults) | -6.23 | 0.64 | -11.39 | 0.47 |
| Hospital size | ||||
| Rurality | -4.9 | 0.64 | -8.7 | 0.47 |
| U.S. region |
Comparison of telestroke consultations in commercial platform to published data from 3 academic hub-and-spoke telestroke networks.
| Commercial Platform N=65,535 | Georgia's REACH Program | Kaiser Permanente Southern California | Partners Telestroke network | TeleMedical Project for integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National | Georgia | Southern California | New England | Southeast Bavaria/Germany | |
| Years reported | 2013–2019 | 2003–2005 | 2013–2015 | 2003–2018 | 2003–2012 |
| Number of spoke/receiving hospitals | 132 | 30 | 10 | 43 | 15 |
| Rate of stroke diagnosis | 54% | Not included | Not included | Not included | Not included |
| Proportion of patients receiving alteplase | 10.1% | 15.5% | 10.9% | 18.9% | 15.5% in most recent year of data |
| Door-to-needle time, minutes | 53 (42–73) | Not included | 55 (47–69) | 73 (55–100) | 40 (29–59) in most recent year of data |
Legend. IQR Interquartile Range