| Literature DB >> 34419116 |
Rosaria Giampaolo1, Rosaria Marotta2, Francesco Saverio Biagiarelli2, Antonella Zampa3, Stefania Moramarco4, Ersilia Buonomo3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Child malnutrition is still a concern in marginalized groups of populations, such as immigrants living in very low socio-economic conditions. Roma children are within the most hard-to-reach populations, susceptible to undernutrition and growth retardation. In the city of Rome (Italy), the Hospital "Bambino Gesù", in collaboration with the Catholic Association Community of Saint'Egidio, is dedicating free services for the health and nutritional needs of vulnerable people.Entities:
Keywords: Camps; Child malnutrition; Immigrants; Italy; Roma; Stunting; Underweight; Wasting
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34419116 PMCID: PMC8380018 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-021-01122-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Pediatr ISSN: 1720-8424 Impact factor: 2.638
Anthropometric measurements of under-five children grouped by months (all sample)
| At birth | 3–6 months | 7–12 months | 13–24 months | 25–36 months | 37–48 months | 49–59 months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.01 ± 0.46 | 7.1 ± 1.0 | 8.9 ± 1.3 | 11.8 ± 1.5 | 13.8 ± 1.9 | 15.9 ± 2.4 | 18.0 ± 3.1 | |
| 49.4 ± 2.2 | 64,6 ± 2.8 | 72.9 ± 3.5 | 84.5 ± 4.0 | 93.4 ± 4.4 | 100.3 ± 5.0 | 107.2 ± 5.1 | |
| −0.64 ± 1.0 | − 0.74 ± 1.0 | − 0.49 ± 1.6 | − 0.11 ± 1.1 | −0.21 ± 1.1 | −0.27 ± 1.2 | −0.22 ± 1.1 | |
| 0.47 ± 1.2 | −1.00 ± 1.0 | − 0.92 ± 2.0 | − 0.70 ± 1.2 | −0.56 ± 1.1 | −0.69 ± 1.2 | −0.52 ± 0.9 | |
| −0.85 ± 1.2 | 0.04 ± 1.0 | − 0.06 ± 1.0 | 0.32 ± 1.0 | 0.15 ± 1.0 | 0.2 ± 1.0 | 0.09 ± 1.1 |
Anthropometric measurements of under-five children grouped by months (Roma vs. non-Roma)
| Anthropometric measurement,1 mean ± SD | Roma children | Non-Roma children | Student |
|---|---|---|---|
| | −0.87 ± 1.0 | − 0.29 ± 0.9 | 0.000 |
| | − 0.34 ± 1.1 | 0.33 ± 1.1 | 0.001 |
| | −0.96 ± 1.3 | − 0.71 ± 1.2 | NS |
| | −1.02 ± 1.0 | − 0.32 ± 0.9 | 0.015 |
| | −1.42 ± 0.7 | − 0.38 ± 1.1 | 0.001 |
| | −0.05 ± 1.1 | − 0.02 ± 1.1 | NS |
| | −0.99 ± 1.2 | − 0.00 ± 0.8 | 0.000 |
| | −1.65 ± 0.9 | − 0.23 ± 0.9 | 0.000 |
| | − 0.15 ± 1.3 | 0.08 ± 1 | NS |
| | −0.56 ± 1.2 | 0.25 ± 0.9 | 0.002 |
| | −1.4 ± 1.0 | −0.1 ± 1 | 0.000 |
| | 0.23 ± 1.1 | 0.4 ± 1 | NS |
| | −0.74 ± 1.1 | 0.17 ± 0.9 | 0.001 |
| | −1.34 ± 0.9 | 0.01 ± 0.9 | 0.000 |
| | 0.1 ± 1 | 0.25 ± 1.1 | NS |
| | −0.66 ± 1.1 | 0.10 ± 1.2 | 0.006 |
| | −1.29 ± 0.9 | − 0.10 ± 1.2 | 0.000 |
| | 0.26 ± 1 | 0.31 ± 1 | NS |
| | −0.32 ± 1.1 | − 0.07 ± 1.1 | NS |
| | −0.96 ± 0.8 | 0.09 ± 0.8 | 0.000 |
| | 0.13 ± 1.3 | −0.5 ± 0.7 | NS |
Risk of having low birthweight (Roma vs. non-Roma children)
| Roma n. (%) | Non-Roma n. (%) | OR (CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birth weight < 2.5 kg | 28 (19.2) | 7 (7.6) | 2.8 (2.2–6.9) |
| Birth weight > 2.5 kg | 118 (80.8) | 85 (92.4) |
Anthropometric characteristics of school-aged children at different time of visits
| 6 years | 7 years | 8 years | 9 years | 10 years | 11 years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.9 ± 6.4 | 23.5 ± 5.8 | 24.7 ± 6.8 | 28.3 ± 9.7 | 29 ± 4.9 | 38.5 ± 10.6 | |
| 110.9 ± 5.9 | 119.6 ± 7.1 | 120.9 ± 6.6 | 126.9 ± 7.5 | 131.9 ± 5.6 | 143.7 ± 7.7 | |
| 0.1 ± 1.9 | 0.41 ± 1.3 | 0.18 ± 1.6 | 0.16 ± 1.9 | − 0.11 ± 0.8 | −1.48 ± 1.5 | |
| − 0.07 ± 1.1 | 0.22 ± 1.2 | − 0.28 ± 1.1 | − 0.26 ± 1.2 | −0.35 ± 0.8 | 0.16 ± 1 | |
| 0.16 ± 2.2 | 0.38 ± 1.1 | 0.45 ± 1.6 | 0.41 ± 1.9 | 0.10 ± 0.8 | 0.32 ± 1.4 |
Anthropometric characteristics of school-aged children (all sample, Roma and non-Roma)
| Total (n.177) | Roma | Non-Roma | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93.3 ± 17.3 | 94 ± 13 | 92 ± 19 | NS | |
| 26.8 ± 8.7 | 24.3 ± 7.3 | 28.3 ± 9.1 | 0.002 | |
| 123.7 ± 10.5 | 122.0 ± 9.4 | 126.5 ± 10.7 | 0.004 | |
| 0.15 ± 1.5 | − 0.38 ± 1.6 | 0.50 ± 1.4 | 0.001 | |
| −1.15 ± 1.1 | −0.61 ± 1.1 | 0.14 ± 1.1 | < 0.001 | |
| 0.3 ± 1.6 | 0.04 ± 1.5 | 0.5 ± 1.5 | 0.04 | |
| 6.3 | 13 | 1.9 | 0.004 | |
| 2.3 | 4.3 | 0.9 | NS | |
| 2.8 | 5.8 | 0.9 | NS | |
| 10.8 | 7.2 | 13.1 | NS |
Fig. 1Prevalence of malnutrition in under-five Roma children in different studies
Fig. 2Prevalence of malnutrition in school-aged children: comparison with the Macedonia study